March 3, 2015 | By Richard C. Longworth

Chicago Picks a Mayor

Minority Report Blog / Creative Commons

Chicagoans, or at least a few of them, will vote next month in a mayoral election notable both for its importance and for its meager turnout. Either Mayor Rahm Emanuel or his challenger, Jesus (Chuy) Garcia, will be the next mayor. In a sense, it’s a shame they both can’t win.

This mayoral election has demonstrated the fact that Chicago really is two cities—split racially and ethnically, as usual, but even more so, split economically, between the booming, globalized part of the city and the rest, the eroding racial and ethnic neighborhoods bypassed by the global economy and its benefits.

Emanuel, the hard-charging and well-connected former top aide to President Obama, is the mayor of Global Chicago. Garcia, a veteran pol whom everybody calls simply “Chuy” (pronounced chewy), speaks to the rest of the city.

A rational city would elect both of them in the election run-off April 7. Then Emanuel could run his part of the city and Garcia could run his. The two mayors could have lunch weekly at Petro’s, across the street from City Hall, to make sure their two cities are on the same page.

In my dreams. Chicago, like all cities, is limited to one mayor at a time. The heavy betting here is that Emanuel, having been given a good scare in the first round, will tap his ample war chest and win another four years on the fifth floor of City Hall.

Actually, Emanuel was favored to win the first round outright by getting more than 50 percent of the votes against four challengers, including Garcia, just as he had in his first mayoral campaign four years ago. The fact that he was forced into a runoff was seen as a humiliating result: The Chicago Reader, one of the city’s alternative weeklies, led its story with the headline, “Chuy Defeats Rahm.”

Actually, Emanuel got 45% of the vote, Garcia got 34% and the other three candidates got about 20% altogether.

Most pundits saw the result as a protest vote—against Emanuel’s imperious and chilly style, against his relentless self-promotion, against his badly-handled closing of 50 schools (mostly in black wards), against his battles with the unions, against unabashed courting of out-of-town hedge funds and other donors to build his $30 million campaign bank account. (Garcia, by contrast, raised $1 million.)

It’s generally assumed that many of these protest voters, having gotten Emanuel’s attention, will dutifully vote for him in the run-off, if only because he radiates a competence that Garcia can’t match. Chuy, while well-liked, shows no sign of the ability to run the city. Indeed, he has been more effective so far in attacking Emanuel’s ties to “the big money special interests” than in suggesting solutions to the city’s real problems.

But the real key for both candidates may lie in getting out the vote. A shrewd analysis in In These Times magazine by a political activist named Marilyn Katz noted that the city’s total vote in the first round was some 200,000 votes below that of last fall’s gubernatorial election.

More to the point, this total was some 120,000 votes below that of the 2011 mayoral election, which Emanuel won outright. 

According to Katz, vote totals in the predominately African-American wards fell by 97,000 below those in the gubernatorial election, and by 91,000 in the predominately white wards. The total vote in the Hispanic wards was off only 15,000.

In other words, Emanuel, who won both the white and black votes in 2011, simply failed to get out the vote. He vastly outspent Garcia on TV ads and the other weapons that money can buy, but seemingly didn’t invest much in the kind of door-knocking retail politics familiar to most Chicagoans.

Compared to 2011, Emanuel got only two-thirds as many votes last month, a dip of some 111,000 votes.

The Mexican-born Garcia did better, but not much. He may have forced Emanuel into a runoff, but he still got 37,000 fewer votes than the two Hispanic candidates whom Emanuel beat four years ago.

It’s obviously distasteful to stress these racial and ethnic components. Distasteful, but unavoidable. Chicago, although not quite so segregated as it once was, remains a balkanized place, with entire wards that are black, Latino or white ethnic.

Not every black voter votes black, of course, and not every white voter votes white. But race still counts. Emanuel won more than half the black vote in 2011, and his success in the runoff may depend on getting the endorsement of at least one of the two black candidates he defeated last month.

Emanuel faces an uphill challenge in winning these black votes, for reasons that illustrate the problems facing this city and any mayor who tries to run it.

Chicago is America’s most heavily indebted city, mostly because past mayors bought development and labor peace by borrowing against the future. Now that future is here. Any mayor has to cut costs while increasing revenue. The problem is how to cut costs without eroding the city’s global status, on which its economic future depends, while increasing revenue without pricing the working and middle classes out of the city.

Emanuel tried to do this partly by closing those 50 schools. He may have had the facts on his side: the schools were in depopulating neighborhoods. But the closings resulted in a needlessly ham-handed, profanity-laced battle with the city’s teachers’ union, which is now leading the battle to deny him a second term. Those who know him say he cares desperately about the city’s schools. But he has failed to convince not only teachers but parents that he cares.

Chicago ranks regularly among the worlds’ mightiest cities. It also is filled with people who are not sharing in this global vitality. Any mayor’s job is to close the widening gap between these two Chicagos.
Too few people believe that Emanuel wants to do this, and too few people believe that Garcia knows how. But come April 7, one of them will be mayor. 

About

Richard Longworth is nonresident senior fellow on global cities at The Chicago Council on Global Affairs and author of On Global Cities and Caught in the Middle: America’s Heartland in the Age of Globalism, on the impact of globalization on the American Midwest. He also was a distinguished visiting scholar at DePaul University and adjunct professor of international relations at Northwestern University, and is a mentor at the Harris School at the University of Chicago.

Archive


| By Richard C. Longworth

Global Cities Speak

Global cities exist. Like globalization itself, they’re new but real. And like globalization, they’re both enriching and impoverishing, good for those who know how to navigate these global waters, bad for those left in their wake.

| By Richard C. Longworth

On Global Cities

In my new book, On Global Cities, I take a fresh and focused look at global cities — what they are, why they are special, what makes them global, how they emerged, and where they are going.

| By Richard C. Longworth

Into The Madding Crowd

We’re told that we’re living in a world of lonely individuals. Maybe so. But my bet is that the future really lives, like the rest of us, in crowds.


| By Richard C. Longworth

The Future of Farming

I was talking recently with a farmer who farms a big spread in northern Illinois. There’s more to this these days, he said, than just going out and plowing the back 40. Where and how he plows depends largely on the data he gets daily from three satellites orbiting a thousand miles above his farm.  

| By Richard C. Longworth

New Life for Old Cities

Instead of larding the PACs of their favorite political candidates, wouldn’t it be nice if Chicago’s plutocrats put their money where it might actually do some real good? 

| By Richard C. Longworth

Chicago as Stockholm

Chicago is getting bad press, to put it mildly. It may be time for the city to think about a makeover – in both substance and image – if it is going to be taken seriously as a global city. 

| By Richard C. Longworth

Governors on the Warpath

Illinois and Indiana may be competitors, but it’s mostly over which governor can do the most damage to his state. Earlier this month, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence seemed ready to retire the gubernatorial dunce cap, with his signing and then backtracking on his state’s infamous “religious freedom” law. But now comes Bruce Rauner, Illinois’ rookie governor, with a virtual declaration of economic warfare on the Hoosiers next door.

| By Richard C. Longworth

The Midwest's Fresh Water Solution

The Midwest is sitting on the resource that will shape the future, and it’s just beginning to think what it can do with it. No, it’s not oil. Nor iron, steel or farmland, the resources that powered its industrial-era economy. It’s water. Or rather, fresh water, the useful low-salt variety that is in increasingly short supply around the country and around the world. 

| By Richard C. Longworth

What's Ailing Midwestern Legislatures?

The Indiana legislature recently passed a bill, signed by Gov. Mike Pence that, in effect, authorizes businesses in that state to discriminate against gays and lesbians. Pence and the Indiana legislature claim the bill is meant to protect religious freedom, not to discriminate against any group. Not surprisingly, nobody believes them, especially as their's isn't the only Midwestern state passing this type of legislation. 


| By Richard C. Longworth

It's Politics Time Again in Iowa

It’s early days yet in Iowa. The state girls’ basketball tournament is barely over. Farmers won’t start planting the first corn or soybeans for another month yet. The last vestiges of snow still fringe some fields. But it’s never too early for politics in the state that seems to have a lock on the quadrennial jockeying for pole position in the presidential sweepstakes.

| By Richard C. Longworth

Chicago Picks a Mayor

Chicagoans, or at least a few of them, will vote next month in a mayoral election notable both for its importance and for its meager turnout. Either Mayor Rahm Emanuel or his challenger, Jesus (Chuy) Garcia, will be the next mayor. In a sense, it’s a shame they both can’t win.