October 1, 2015 | By

Guest Commentary – Will Boehner's Departure Imperil the TPP?

US House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) heads to a news conference to discuss his resignation after it was announced at the US Capitol in Washington, September 25, 2015. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Trade ministers from the 12 participating nations are trying to finalize the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) this week in Atlanta. As hard as those negotiations may be, any deal that emerges will have to make it through the US Congress. How have the odds changed with Speaker John Boehner’s surprise resignation announcement last week?

Supporters of TPP will find comfort looking at the voting records of the two candidates vying for the speakership—Kevin McCarthy (R-California) and Daniel Webster (R-Florida). The CATO Institute has a nifty database that tracks all the trade votes by members of Congress, and ranks them accordingly. McCarthy and Webster, like Boehner, both supported recent US free trade deals with Columbia, Korea, and Panama. And while McCarthy is a more vocal supporter of the TPP than Webster, both men ultimately voted in favor of passing Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) in June. Similarly, the three top contenders for House majority leader—Tom Price (R-Georgia), Steve Scalise (R-Louisiana), and Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Washington)— all have solid voting records in favor of free trade and voted to pass TPA.

This suggests there is a very good chance that whomever assumes Republican leadership in the post-Boehner House will continue to carry the TPP torch.

But if the case for TPP optimism can be found by looking at the new potential Republican leadership, the case for pessimism can be found by looking everywhere else.

Start with rank-and-file Republicans. Will Boehner’s resignation make them more or less likely to vote for the TPP? Consider that Boehner’s fate demonstrated to other House Republicans the perils of compromise, and the consequences of betraying the more conservative members of Congress. His resignation was an apparent victory for the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, which will likely grow in influence after Boehner leaves. Given that the TPP is one of President Obama’s top policy priorities, how many House Republicans will be willing to hand him a victory in the thick of the 2016 campaign season?

Add to this the overwhelming Democratic opposition to the deal. Bernie Sanders, who represents an influential and growing voice from the left, declares the TPP is “anti-worker legislation” that “must be defeated.” Or look at the fiery populist rhetoric that is gaining traction within conservative circles that generally look favorably at free trade. Donald Trump calls the deal a “disaster” and an “attack on America’s business.” These grievances will be more and more difficult to ignore the closer we get to elections.

Finally, remember that TPP will need 218 votes to pass in the House. And recall that in the June 18 House vote to advance Trade Promotion Authority, there were few votes to spare (see Figure 1). This means that defections, whether Democrat or Republican, could be fatal for the deal.

Figure 1

Of course, if trade negotiations drift in Atlanta, there may be no deal for Congress to vote on. But even if an agreement is reached, the struggle over TPP will be far from over.  

About the Author

Andy Morimoto joined The Chicago Council in 2014 and currently serves as a research associate.

 

About

Phil Levy is senior fellow on the global economy at The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Previously he was associate professor of business administration at the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business. He was formerly a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and taught at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs. From 2003 to 2006, he served first as senior economist for trade for President Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers and then as a member of Secretary of State Rice’s Policy Planning Staff, covering international economic matters. Before working in government, he was a faculty member of Yale University’s Department of Economics for nine years and spent one of those as academic director of Yale’s Center for the Study of Globalization.

His academic writings have appeared in such outlets as The American Economic ReviewEconomic Journal, and theJournal of International Economics. He is a regular contributor to Foreign Policy magazine’s online Shadow Government section and writes on topics including trade policy, economic relations with China, and the European economic crisis. Dr. Levy has testified before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Joint Economic Committee, the House Committee on Ways and Mean, and the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. He received his PhD in Economics from Stanford University in 1994 and his AB in Economics from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor in 1988.

Archive


Why are Trade Deals Complicated?

Why not embrace the one-sentence free trade agreement? Consider three examples of the complications that have arisen over the years.

Just a Flesh Wound?

At the end of July, negotiators for the 12 Trans-Pacific Partnership countries failed to conclude a trade agreement. Was the failure just a flesh wound, or was it something more serious?

It’s all Greek to Me

As the Greek suffering mounts and they careen towards Sunday’s referendum, Senior Fellow Phil Levy has two additional questions surrounding the Greek crisis.

Previously, on Game of Trade…

It is traditional, in intricate ongoing dramatic sagas, to begin a new episode with a recap. If you are just tuning in to trade policy prospects in the US Congress, Senior Fellow Phil Levy breaks it down in his latest post on the World of Cents blog.
 

Venn Will They See How Serious This Is?

After the President’s trade policy was blocked in the US Senate yesterday, there was a divide among analysts over just how serious a setback the vote was. But it is difficult to see how the trade agenda could now advance, and the sensitive timing of trade talks means that a delay could be fatal.

Cities and Trade

Last week, the battle to gain trade promotion authority (TPA) began in earnest in Washington.

China Joins the Monetary Party

This week China took an unusually strong measure to goose its economy. It lowered the amount of money that Chinese banks needed to hold in reserve. In theory, this should allow the banks to take those sequestered funds and use them for new loans, thereby stimulating the Chinese economy.

International Ramifications of the Jobs Report

The big news of the morning was that the US economy created 295,000 jobs in February, pushing the unemployment rate down to 5.5 percent. Both numbers were better than expected, which seemed to paint a picture of an economy returning to normal after a long, chilly period of slow growth and painful joblessness.


An Economic Question about the President’s Immigration Action

There is a raging debate about whether the President stretched or exceeded his executive powers, but let us set aside the legal and political questions for the moment and consider a (wonkish) economic one: How does the administration envision the demand for low-skilled labor?

Can We Take a Hint?

Trade impasses between the United States and Japan are eminently predictable. They will continue until the Obama administration shows it has achieved domestic agreement on trade. 

New Deficit Numbers in Perspective

In this week of financial market turmoil, there was a notable bit of good news: the US federal budget deficit shrank to 2.8 percent of GDP, its lowest level since 2007. 

Are EU Sanctions Working?

Are EU sanctions on Russia working? If goal is to annoy Russians and make symbolic gesture, then yes. Otherwise, no.


Phantom French Austerity

The New York Times is reporting a brewing political crisis in France. The Prime Minister is planning to dissolve the government in a battle over budgetary belt-tightening.