November 9, 2016 | By Dina Smeltz

The US-Russian Relationship

One of the many surprises of President Elect Donald Trump’s campaign promises occurred early on: an endorsement of friendlier relations with Russia. On this issue, he remained consistent over time, and resulted this morning with an invitation from Russian President Vladimir Putin to restore US-Russia ties. And yet, the Council’s 2016 survey found little difference between core Trump supporters’ dismal views on Russia and those of more traditional Republicans.

In an effort to grasp the public basis for US-Russian disillusionment the 2016 Chicago Council Survey partnered with the Levada Analytical Center in Moscow to ask Americans and Russians how they feel about each other and—more importantly—each other’s government. Unsurprisingly, the Council and Levada found that Americans don’t view Russia favorably and Russians don’t view the US favorably. In both countries, the crisis in Ukraine brought public favorability to lows not seen in the post-Cold War world.

Distrust is a driving force behind these sentiments. Russians believe the real reason the US placed sanctions on Russia was to curtail Russian might. They also fear a disagreement over Syria will result in an armed conflict between the two countries and recognize that the Russian government fears NATO enlargement. Americans similarly suspect Russia is trying to constrain it and that it is working against US interests in the conflict in Syria, the Iran deal, and wider nonproliferation efforts. And yet, like Trump, majorities of all Americans want more cooperation with Russia.

To read more about the chilled American and Russian perceptions, and a few sprinkles of hope for future improved relations, see the Council’s brief here (по-русски здесь) and The Washington Post’s take on the data here

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive

| By Jack Benjamin

6 Ways in Which Liberal and Moderate Democrats Diverge on Key Issues

Democratic primary season is well under way, highlighted by recent debates and battleground fundraising by the large field of presidential hopefuls. As candidates deliver their pitch to voters, party supporters are not in lockstep on every issue.


| By Ruby Scanlon

The Generational Divide Over Climate Change

America’s young and old are split on what to do about climate change, presenting a major hurdle for the country’s youth to attain serious and immediate action.









| By Bettina Hammer

Americans Aren't Fans of Arms Sales

The United States has long been the tops arms supplier in the world. Yet public opinion data shows that Americans aren’t fans of U.S. arms sales.


| By Bettina Hammer

Little Admiration for the United States among MENA Publics

Most Americans believe that respect and admiration for the United States are instrumental in achieving US foreign policy goals. But a new poll finds publics in the Middle East and North Africa continue to view the United States unfavorably. 


| By Bettina Hammer

Peace to Prosperity Misses the Mark with Palestinians

At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East. But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?



| By Dina Smeltz, Brendan Helm

Scholars vs the Public: Collapse of the INF Treaty

In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.

Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.