February 22, 2016 | By Karl Friedhoff

Update: South Korean Public Opinion on the Closure of Kaesong

South Korean officials check a vehicle carrying a products made in the Kaesong Industrial Complex. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji

In a previous blog post, I wrote about South Korea’s unilateral shut down of the Kaesong Industrial Complex. At the time, the poll conducted by Realmeter on February 11 was the only one available. In it, the South Korean public was nearly evenly split on the closure, with 48 percent in favor and 44 percent opposed. But Gallup Korea recently released its poll conducted February 16-18, and it finds much clearer support for the closure of the business park. In this more recent survey, 55 percent favored its closure while 33 percent opposed. But the drivers of this shift are not clear.

Arguably, the differences may not even be significant. The polls came from different polling firms, conducted on different days, with different sample sizes (511 for Realmeter versus 1,006 for Gallup Korea). But the results of the Gallup Korea poll make for far better optics for the South Korean government.  

The primary driver of the difference appears to arise from the response options used in the surveys—the question wording itself is roughly the same. In the Realmeter poll which found a 48/44 split, the response option that favored closing the park posited that the profits for the North Korean regime were being diverted into the North’s weapons program. The response option for opposition highlighted the fact that the park’s closure would damage the South Korean businesses with operations at Kaesong.

In contrast, the Gallup Korea poll—which found a 55/33 split in favor—used basic favor or opposed response options without establishing conditions for the response. There was no reminder that money may have been diverted. And there was no mention of the loss for South Korean business.

At this point, given all the variables, it is difficult to say if this is a real shift in South Korea towards favoring the closure of Kaesong. But the fact that a nearly even split seems to be the baseline should be good news for the Park administration.


The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.


| By Jack Benjamin

6 Ways in Which Liberal and Moderate Democrats Diverge on Key Issues

Democratic primary season is well under way, highlighted by recent debates and battleground fundraising by the large field of presidential hopefuls. As candidates deliver their pitch to voters, party supporters are not in lockstep on every issue.

| By Ruby Scanlon

The Generational Divide Over Climate Change

America’s young and old are split on what to do about climate change, presenting a major hurdle for the country’s youth to attain serious and immediate action.

| By Bettina Hammer

Americans Aren't Fans of Arms Sales

The United States has long been the tops arms supplier in the world. Yet public opinion data shows that Americans aren’t fans of U.S. arms sales.

| By Bettina Hammer

Little Admiration for the United States among MENA Publics

Most Americans believe that respect and admiration for the United States are instrumental in achieving US foreign policy goals. But a new poll finds publics in the Middle East and North Africa continue to view the United States unfavorably. 

| By Bettina Hammer

Peace to Prosperity Misses the Mark with Palestinians

At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East. But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?

| By Dina Smeltz, Brendan Helm

Scholars vs the Public: Collapse of the INF Treaty

In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.

Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.