July 21, 2017 | By Dina Smeltz

Trust Trump to Negotiate with Putin? Americans Say Nyet

US President Donald Trump meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin during the their bilateral meeting at the G20 summit in Hamburg, Germany July 7, 2017. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

Today, the Washington Post reported that some of President Trump’s outside legal counsel have looked into who the president can pardon including whether he can pardon his family or even himself. This news follows the recent bombshell that Donald Jr., his son-in-law Jared Kushner, and his then-campaign manager Paul Manafort met last summer with a Russian lawyer who claimed to have compromising information about Hillary Clinton. While news of Jr.’s meeting broke at home, all eyes in Hamburg, Germany were on Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin when they met on the sidelines of the G20 meeting last month, eclipsing much of the news from the official proceedings.

Apparently, Trump and Russian President Putin hit it off when they met at the G20 last month in Hamburg, Germany. Their meeting, which included Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, had been scheduled for only thirty minutes but lasted about two hours. Since then, reports have disclosed that President Trump had another subsequent private conversation with Putin at a dinner with G20 summit leaders and their spouses, with only the Kremlin-provided interpreter present. Americans are more cautious about reaching out to Russia than perhaps President Trump. Only 15 percent of Americans have a favorable view of Putin (according to a July 8-12 Bloomberg poll), and 50 percent said that Trump was “too friendly” in his attitude toward Russia (42% said his attitude is about right in a June 22-27 Quinnipiac poll).  An even more recent (July 10-13, 2017) ABC News/Washington Post survey finds that a majority of Americans say they have little to no trust in Donald Trump to negotiate on “America’s behalf with Russian leader Vladimir Putin” (66%, with 32% a great deal or good amount of trust). 

After the first meeting, Tillerson reported that President Trump had pressed Putin about Russian meddling in the US election, but Trump had moved the discussion along after Putin refused to acknowledge Russian interference. For his part, Putin reported that he had denied Russia’s involvement in the US presidential election and he believed that his answer had “satisfied” Trump. But a majority of Americans would not be satisfied:  six in ten (60%) think that the Russian government tried to influence the 2016 US presidential election, though only 44 percent think that Trump benefitted from this interference.  Even before last night’s news that Trump may be looking for ways to discredit special counsel Robert Mueller, more Americans say that Donald Trump is trying to interfere with investigations of possible Russian involvement rather than cooperating (52% to 37%)(ABC/WaPo). Two in three Americans (64%) believe Trump was more concerned about protecting his administration than about protecting the United States, according to a recent CBS News poll.

Asked about the meeting between Donald Trump Jr. et al and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya to obtain damaging information about Hillary Clinton, nearly two-thirds (63%) of the American public believe it was inappropriate for the three Trump associates to attend the meeting. Even before these meetings came to light, a June NPR/PBS/Marist poll showed that a majority of Americans believed that Trump’s campaign associates did something either illegal (33%) or unethical (25%). A narrow majority said that Trump himself has done something either illegal (25%) or unethical (29%).  With all of these polls, there are wide partisan divides, with Democrats expressing concern over possible Russian influence and possible Trump campaign involvement, and Republicans tending to dismiss these charges.

Despite Americans’ unfavorable views of Putin, Americans think it is better to cooperate with Russia than actively try to limit its power. The June NPR/PBS/Marist poll found that 59 percent said it would be better to build a relationship with Russia than treat Russia as a threat. More self-described Republicans (67%) than Democrats (46%) favor building better relations, which seem to reflect an interesting partisan shift since Donald Trump became president.  In December 2016, the Chicago Council Survey found that 56 percent of Americans said the US should cooperate with Russia.  But in that poll, Democrats (62%) were more likely than Republicans (50%) to cooperate.  This partisan shift signals that the first six months of the Trump administration have moved Republicans toward a more favorable position – and Democrats toward a less favorable one – regarding US-Russia cooperation. Our new 2017 Chicago Council Survey results, expected next week, will demonstrate whether and how GOP opinion has moved on other foreign policy issues. 

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive

| By Dina Smeltz

Sweet and Sour: American Opinion on China

Several recent surveys show that Americans recognize China’s growing influence and emphasize the importance of friendly engagement with China.  But many also recognize that over the longer term China’s rise could be a negative development for the competitiveness of the United States.


| By Dina Smeltz

They're Coming to America

Immigration reform is on the move: a comprehensive immigration reform bill, S. 744, passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 21 by a vote of 13-5, with a full Senate vote expected to take place this summer.


| By Dina Smeltz

Game of Drones

President Obama will be discussing his administration’s drone program and other elements of his counterterrorism strategy in a speech he will deliver today at the National Defense University.





| By Dina Smeltz

Ten Years On, GOP Faithful Less Positive about Iraq War

There have been a lot of retrospective pieces about the Iraq war the past few weeks, but Ole R. Holsti, the George V. Allen Professor of Political Science (Emeritus) at Duke University, has been looking at American attitudes on the Iraq war for quite a while.


| By Dina Smeltz

Popping the Question

Throughout these posts I've tried to highlight the critical impact of question wording on polling results, and how specific wording can influence responses.  


| By Dina Smeltz

Splitting Atoms

Rather than abandoning our dated technology (à la Dr. Frankenstein), should we  "love our monsters," and modernize them for current conditions?





| By Dina Smeltz

It's Not Easy Being Green

The Obama Administration’s energy strategy has evolved over time, viewing the production of natural gas and nuclear energy as a transitional stage in shifting away from dependence on fossil fuels to reliance on cleaner energy sources.