October 18, 2016 | By Dina Smeltz

Top Five Surprising Findings on Americans’ Views on the US Role in the World

1. Partisan differences on immigration are at a historic high point. Since 1998, when the Chicago Council on Global Affairs first asked Americans to rate whether large numbers of immigrants and refugees coming into the United States is a critical, important but not critical, or not an important threat to the country, a majority of Republicans have consistently said it is a critical threat. This year’s number, 67 percent, is at an all-time high. By contrast, since 2002, Democrats’ concern about immigration has steadily declined from 62 percent to just 27 percent today saying it is a critical threat. 

2. Americans have grown more positive in views of Mexican immigrants. Although Donald Trump has turned up the volume on stereotyping Mexican immigrants, Americans overall -- and across party lines -- have grown more positive toward immigrants from Mexico since 2013, the last time the question was asked. Then, 55 percent reported favorable views of Mexican immigrants living in the United States -- a view that rose to 60 percent in 2016. Looking at partisan differences, three quarters of Democrats (74 percent, up from 64 percent in 2013), and nearly half of Republicans (46 percent, up from 38 percent in 2013) say they view positively Mexican immigrants living in the United States.  

3. Americans still support globalization. You wouldn’t know it from all the trade-bashing in the debates thus far but overall support for globalization among the American public remains strong: Two in three Americans say globalization is mostly good for the United States, one of the highest levels ever reported in the Chicago Council Survey. That support is cross-partisan, too, with three in four Democrats (74 percent), and six in ten Republicans (59 percent) and Independents (61 percent) saying that globalization is mostly good.

4. Majority of Americans support the TPP. While the Transpacific Partnership has been held up to signify the negative aspects of free trade, a majority of the public overall supports the TPP (60 percent). This includes Democrats (70 percent), Republicans (58 percent), and Independents (52 percent). Even half of the core supporters of Donald Trump (49 percent, meaning those who wanted him to win the nomination against other primary candidates) and Bernie Sanders (56 percent) favor the TPP.

5. Six in ten support the Iran nuclear agreement. In the wake of the signing of the nuclear deal with Iran, various polls had shown a large drop in the percentages of Americans supporting the deal. But the Chicago Council Survey shows that a majority of Americans overall (60 percent) think the United States should participate in “the agreement that lifts some international economic sanctions against Iran in exchange for strict limits on its nuclear program for at least the next decade.” This includes 74 percent of Democrats, 57 percent of Independents, and half of Republicans.

This data comes from the annual Chicago Council Survey of Americans’ views on foreign policy, “America in the Age of Uncertainty.”

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive

| By Dina Smeltz

The Urban-Rural Divide?

Are Americans as divided along geographic lines when it comes to key foreign policy matters as their voting patterns suggest? 


| By Karl Friedhoff

Moon Jae-In's Victory Does Not Put US-Korea Alliance at Risk

With the election of Moon Jae-In to the presidency of South Korea, there are concerns that the US-Korea alliance hangs in the balance. Those fears are overblown. While there are rough waters ahead, much of that will emanate from the Trump administration's handling of cost-sharing negotiations in the near future.


| By Dina Smeltz

The Foreign Policy Blob Is Bigger Than You Think

The Blob isn't just science fiction. When it comes to US foreign policy, its reach is far and wide with wide swaths of agreement between foreign policy elite and the general public. A new report from the Council and the Texas National Security Network explains.


| By Dina Smeltz

American Views of Israel Reveal Partisan and Generational Divides

Despite partisan differences on taking a side in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and on the status of US-Israel bilateral relations, overall trends from Chicago Council Survey data indicate that the relationship between the United States and Israel will continue to be viewed warmly by the American public.


#TBT: That Time We All Feared Chemical and Biological Weapons

In the spirit of Throw Back Thursday, Running Numbers is digging out its archived polls to look back at America’s foreign policy feelings of old. This week, we’re looking at Council data on Americans' perceptions of the threat posed by chemical and biological weapons in the late 90s and early 00s.



| By Dina Smeltz

​Polls Measure So Much More than Voting Intentions

The polling community took a lot heat following the failure of forecasters and data journalists to predict Trump's triumph in the 2016 election. But polls measure so much more than voting intentions says Council senior fellow Dina Smeltz.


| By Karl Friedhoff, Craig Kafura

Public Opinion in the US and China

There is perhaps no more important bilateral relationship in the world today than the one between the United States and China—the world’s two most important players in terms of economics and security. Where do the Chinese and American publics stand on key issues in the relationship, and what policies do they want to see their respective nations pursue worldwide? 



| By Diana C. Mutz

How Trade Attitudes Changed from 2012-2016

Trade was an important issue in the recent presidential election, but not in the way the media and many prominent observers have led us to believe.  The dominant narrative in the media was that disgruntled manufacturing workers whose jobs had been sent overseas emerged, understandably, as trade’s strong opponents, thus making Trump with his strong anti-trade rhetoric their natural ally.


Who Run the World? Foreign Policy Attitudes on Women and Girls

In partnership with the New America Foundation, the 2016 Chicago Council Survey included two questions developed to provide better insight about the importance of promoting women's rights and women's participation in societies around the world. 


This Presidential Election Was All about Identity, Not Qualities and Issues

Donald Trump just pulled off one of the most stunning upsets in American political history, capturing the presidency last Tuesday night. How did it happen? This election was all about identity politics, with Trump able to connect with non-college whites, especially white men without a college degree.



| By Dina Smeltz

The US-Russian Relationship

The 2016 Chicago Council Survey partnered with the Levada Analytical Center in Moscow to ask Americans and Russians how they feel about each other and—more importantly—each other’s government. 


| By Richard C. Eichenberg

Gender Difference in Foreign Policy Opinions: Implications for 2016

There are three patterns in American politics that take on special significance in 2016: the gender divide in Presidential elections; the low support for Donald Trump among women; and the growing discussion in the foreign policy community about the inclusion of women in the policy process. Nonresident fellow Richard Eichenberg explores the extent of gender difference in the 2016 Chicago Council Survey data and assesses the relevance of any differences to this year’s presidential election.