June 29, 2017 | By

#TBT 1974: #NOTNixonian

Media commentaries have been making comparisons between investigations into connections between the Trump campaign and the Russian government to the investigations of Watergate during the presidency of Richard Nixon. In fact, the Nixon Presidential Library even objected to likening the firing of then FBI Director James Comey to Nixon’s infamous “Saturday Night Massacre,” with the tweet, “FUN FACT: President Nixon never fired the Director of the FBI.”

These comparisons between Nixon and Trump are not unwarranted; there are some striking similarities. Both investigations involve examining attempts at obtaining damaging information on Democratic presidential candidates during an election. And while Nixon didn’t fire the head of the FBI, both Nixon and Trump fired prominent investigators looking into their campaigns. While both were not initially the focus of investigations, Nixon became so after one of the Watergate burglars recanted his testimony and, according to a recent round of leaks to the Washington Post, it appears Trump is currently being investigated by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III for obstruction of justice.

Trump even suggested he recorded conversations with Comey after he was fired—a bizarre move not only because it appears to have been an empty threat but also because of how insanely Nixonian it looked at a time. Trump then tweeted last week that he did not have any recordings of conversations between himself and Comey.

First, both started their terms (Nixon’s second and Trump’s first) at drastically different places. Nixon won reelection with the largest popular majority in American history, whereas Trump lost the popular vote. According to Gallup polls, Nixon started his second term with 67 percent approval rating. Trump started his with just 45 percent approval. In fact, according to Gallup polls, Americans who approve of Trump have never been the majority, only twice achieving a plurality of just one percentage point. So Nixon lost the approval of Democrats and independents that Trump never had.

The investigation into the Trump campaign’s connections to Russian hacking, however, is not yet having the same effect on his approval rating as Nixon’s investigation had on his. But that is in part because the nature of the similarities is very different. Specifically, Nixon’s actions appeared nefarious to Americans across party lines, whereas Trump’s are less concrete and therefore haven't impacted how his party views him.

Nixon’s presidency suffered significant downturns in public opinion as his culpability in the Watergate Hotel break in became more concrete, whereas Trump’s involvement in any improper acquisition of information on his opponent is not at all conclusive. Nixon’s two biggest drops in approval occurred before he was found guilty by the Senate: at the start of Senate investigations and after the “Saturday Night Massacre.” By the start of the Senate Watergate Committee in May of 1973, his approval rating dropped to 44 percent. His approval rating after the “Saturday Night Massacre” was 27 percent. Neither definitively proved that Nixon had been part of the break-in, but the investigation began because one of the participants said Nixon had been involved. No one involved in hacking the DNC has said that Trump played any role in the cyber espionage, or even knew it was taking place.

Firing James Comey was also far less damning than firing special prosecutor Archibald Cox. Even though Trump stated publically that he fired Comey because of the “Russia thing,” many have argued that he was not attempting to obstruct justice, but rather was frustrated with Comey’s public statements. Nixon, on the other hand, fired Cox when he would not stop asking for a recording of a conversation Nixon had that would later prove his knowledge of the plans to break into the Watergate Hotel.   

Trump’s approval ratings cannot drop to Nixon’s lows without losing the confidence of many in his own party. In fact, there’s even skepticism amongst many republicans (though not a majority) as to whether these investigations should even take place. Last month, a Monmouth University poll found that 73 percent of Americans think the “the Russia investigation [should] continue,” however only 50 percent of Republicans polled responded that it should continue compared to 90 percent of Democrats. These findings are similar to those of the Council survey last December (only 46% of Republicans favored a congressional investigation into Russian actions in the 2016 election).

Trump’s current approval rating is 40 percent, only five percentage points lower than when he took office. By the time Nixon resigned, his approval rating was 24 percent, having dropped 43 percentage points from the start of his second term. It will be interesting to see how his approval ratings change as the investigation continues, however right now it appears it’s having little effect.

FUN FACT: The Council’s first survey was conducted just months after Nixon resigned. 

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive




| By Karl Friedhoff

Korea-Japan Agreement Here to Stay

Karl Friedhoff looks at polling done in South Korea on attitudes towards Japan to add perspective on the recent deal between Korea and Japan to resolve the "comfort women" issue.




| By Dina Smeltz, Craig Kafura

Climate Concerns on the Rise

While Democrats and Republicans are at opposite ends of the spectrum in prioritizing climate change, Chicago Council Surveys going back to 2002 have shown longstanding public support for an international treaty to address the problem.


Americans Hungry for Food Information

There is a renaissance in America’s interest in food and, more specifically, how food is produced. A new Chicago Council poll finds that contrary to the debate about hot-button issues like GMOs, antibiotics, and local food, the vast majority of Americans value food that is above all affordable, safe, and nutritious.

| By Karl Friedhoff, Dina Smeltz

Strong Asia Alliances, Divided Publics

New Council survey data shows that US relations with Japan and South Korea are strong. But mutual distrust between Japan and South Korea continues, even as the United States encourages strengthened relations in the face of a rising China.

| By Sara McElmurry

Calling a Vote before the Curtain Call

Soon-to-be-former Speaker John Boehner has shot down immigration advocates’ requests that he call a vote on immigration before he leaves Congress at the end of the month. But numbers from the 2015 Chicago Council Survey suggest that advancing a vote might not be a bad idea.


| By Karl Friedhoff

Meet the New South Korea

South Korea is no longer sitting back and absorbing North Korea's provocations. A look at attitudes on identity and reunification among South Korea's youth suggests that in the future this will become the norm, not the exception.

| By Craig Kafura

The Politics of the Iran Deal

Republicans have come out strongly against the Iran nuclear deal, and have also used it to slam their biggest Democratic rival for 2016, Hillary Clinton. But is the deal actually a problem for Clinton?