December 19, 2013 | By Dina Smeltz

Split Personality: Ukrainians on the EU versus Russia

I recently came across the article "Goodbye Putin" in the December 14 edition of The Economist, stating that while President Viktor Yanukovich had made a choice to align the country with Russia, the people of Ukraine - by taking to the streets - had chosen a European future. The author put forth the idea that "a majority of Ukrainians share the crowed's aim of integration with the EU."  But it's not that simple.

An International Foundation on Electoral Systems (IFES) survey conducted in October-November 2013 by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) found that nearly identical percentages of Ukrainians said they should have closer economic relations with Russia (34%) as say they should with the EU (35%);  17 percent said both.  On another question,  just slightly more said that Ukraine should take steps to join the European Union (37%) as said that they should join Russia's Customs Union (33%).  An additional 15 percent said Ukraine should not join either of them.

The majority of Ukrainians were dissatisfied with Yanukovich's handling of relations with Russia (68%) - but this result could reflect both those who think relations are too close and those who think relations are not close enough. Half were also dissatisfied with his performance in addressing the status of Ukraine and the EU.

Many following the situation in Ukraine have pointed out that there are also significant regional differences on these issues, and these differences emerge in the IFES survey as well. Ukrainians in the northern, western, and Kyiv regions of the country are more likely to express pro-European inclinations, and those in the east and south are more likely to lean toward Russia. Residents in the center of the country now tend to favor Europe over Russia, though in 2012 they were more pro-Russia than pro-EU.

Just as it shouldn't be assumed that the Ukrainian protesters fully represent the mainstream in Ukraine, neither should it be assumed that all Ukrainians are ready to embrace European democratic values. The IFES poll found opinions quite divided on whether democracy is preferable to other systems of government: while 37 percent say it is, 21% say that in certain situations a non-democratic system may be preferable, and 29% say the system of government doesn't matter to them.

As much as I'm sympathetic toward the protesters in Kyiv, it's important to recognize that there are a lot of other average Ukrainians who do not support a European future for the country. Public opinion is proof.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive

| By James Drimalla

Bleak Outlook on US-Russia Relations

A new joint report by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and the Levada Analytical Center finds experts have little hope for US-Russia relations in the near future.


| By James Drimalla

Millennials' Divergent Views on Global Affairs

Attitudes and beliefs frequently change from generation to generation and a new joint study from the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, CATO Institute, and Charles Koch Institute explores generational differences between the American public on foreign policy issues.



| By Karl Friedhoff

Consequences of Success on the Korean Peninsula

The April 27 inter-Korean summit was largely successful in the eyes of the South Korean public. It has created momentary trust in North Korea, and if that lasts, may lead the public to ask serious questions about the US-South Korea alliance.


| By Karl Friedhoff

The Reunification Spectrum for South Koreans

When it comes to reunification, South Koreans take pause. A quick reunification likely has serious cosequences for the South, and is not much favored by the South Korean public. Instead, the status quo is generally favored, and those views are often conditioned by the actions of North Korea.


| By Karl Friedhoff

Diplomacy in the Air on Korean Peninsula

In the coming months, there will be a flurry of diplomatic activity on the Korean Peninsula. This is good news for many South Koreans, even though the South Korea public still has doubts about North Korea's true intentions.


| By Dzena Berbic, Craig Kafura

America and the Millennial Agenda

Millennials have become the most populous living generation in the United States, overtaking Baby Boomers and Gen Xers in becoming the largest voting body. So what do Millennials want, and what are some of their noticeable generational differences? A recent Chicago Council on Global Affairs event featuring Congresswoman Robin Kelly (D-IL2), former Congressman Bob Dold (R-IL10), POLITICO’s Natasha Korecki, and Council pollster Craig Kafura, discussed Millennial attitudes and the Millennial political agenda.



| By Craig Kafura

O Christmas Tree

Christmas is a widely-celebrated holiday in the United States. Though the Christmas tree remains a popular symbol, Americans are changing the kind of tree they use in their homes—and a small but rising number are opting to celebrate without a tree altogether. 




| By Dina Smeltz

Arrested Development

In President Trump's first major speech before the United Nations General Assembly last week, he described the nuclear agreement with Iran as an "embarrassment" to the United States. But according to the 2017 Chicago Council Survey, the public disagrees. 


Americans Not Sure Trump's Policies Will Make America Safer

The 2017 Chicago Council Survey finds that majorities of Americans continue to think that international terrorism is one of the most critical threats to the United States. But the overall public is not convinced that the Trump administration's policies will make the United States safer from terrorism.