December 13, 2013 | By Dina Smeltz

Six in Ten Afghans Think 2014 Election Outcome will Improve Their Lives

The Asia Foundation released its ninth survey of the Afghan people last week in Kabul; the poll includes a sweeping look at Afghan attitudes toward security, governance, economic conditions and political participation.  With presidential elections scheduled for 2014, the July 2013 survey found an increasing percentage of Afghans saying that the country is going in the right direction (57%). But fewer than half express confidence in a range of political institutions including  government ministers (45%), parliament (46%), and the court system (43%), and these ratings are at an eight-year-low.  A majority of Afghans are still confident in provincial and community level organizations, but at lower levels than in prior years.

Majority Are Optimistic that Results of Presidential Election Will Improve Their Lives 

Despite the controversies and election fraud during the last presidential election in 2009, a majority of Afghans say that in general elections in Afghanistan are free and fair (61%; 35% disagree). Those who believe the elections are generally not "legit" cite corruption - in counting the votes, the electoral process, and in vote buying - and security issues as the main reasons.  A majority (56%) also expect the elections will make their lives betters, though a substantial minority say it will either make no difference (24%) or make their lives worse (15%).

Many remain fearful of venturing out to polling stations. Six in ten Afghans said they would have "some or a lot of fear" if they vote in a national or provincial election, up considerably since the question was first asked in 2006. Fear is highest in the South West, South East, and Western regions of the country, and among Pashtuns.   Election observers from Democracy International found that security concerns in the South contributed to limited accessibility in the 2009 election, particularly for women. Eight in ten say that security conditions are a factor in whether they will travel to polling stations to vote on election day. 

Source:  The Asia Foundation

Broad Confidence in Afghan Security Forces; One in Three Sympathizes with Armed Opposition

With US forces withdrawing in 2014 and no security agreement yet signed, a large majority of Afghans express confidence in the Afghan National Army and the Afghan National Police (ANP) "to be honest and fair with the Afghan people" and to "help improve security." They are also confident that the  ANP "is efficient at arresting those who have committed crimes."  Only about one in three (35%) have sympathy for "armed opposition groups," down from 56 percent in 2009.  

Six in ten (63%) agree that reconciliation efforts between the government and armed opposition groups can stabilize the country, with this support largely concentrated around the provinces that border Pakistan (70-88%). The report notes that residents in the central provinces of Panjshir and Parwan and the western provinces of Ghor and Herat are least likely to support efforts at reconciliation (between 17-50%).   

Looking Ahead

The Asia Foundation and ACSOR, the polling organization carrying out the fieldwork, interviewed more than 9000 respondents nationwide for this survey - a huge effort for this nationwide poll.  The topics are wide-ranging and comprehensive in scope.  But I kept hoping for answers to questions not asked:  How do Afghans feel about US troops withdrawing?  Do they think the ANA can deliver security without assistance from US forces? What are their views on the bilateral security agreement and the possibility of the zero option?  What are their impressions of Karzai and his performance?  Whom would they like to see as his successor?  How would they feel about a power sharing arrangement with the Taliban, if negotiations ever restart?

At least in the publicly released results, I didn't see answers to these critical questions.  My takeaway from these findings is that if Afghans say they are fearful voting in July when the survey was fielded, they probably aren't going to feel much safer when US forces are gone.  And that has big implications for voting turnout and the ultimate credibility of the next elections.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive

| By Karl Friedhoff

Moon Jae-In's Victory Does Not Put US-Korea Alliance at Risk

With the election of Moon Jae-In to the presidency of South Korea, there are concerns that the US-Korea alliance hangs in the balance. Those fears are overblown. While there are rough waters ahead, much of that will emanate from the Trump administration's handling of cost-sharing negotiations in the near future.


| By Dina Smeltz

The Foreign Policy Blob Is Bigger Than You Think

The Blob isn't just science fiction. When it comes to US foreign policy, its reach is far and wide with wide swaths of agreement between foreign policy elite and the general public. A new report from the Council and the Texas National Security Network explains.


| By Dina Smeltz

American Views of Israel Reveal Partisan and Generational Divides

Despite partisan differences on taking a side in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and on the status of US-Israel bilateral relations, overall trends from Chicago Council Survey data indicate that the relationship between the United States and Israel will continue to be viewed warmly by the American public.


#TBT: That Time We All Feared Chemical and Biological Weapons

In the spirit of Throw Back Thursday, Running Numbers is digging out its archived polls to look back at America’s foreign policy feelings of old. This week, we’re looking at Council data on Americans' perceptions of the threat posed by chemical and biological weapons in the late 90s and early 00s.



| By Dina Smeltz

​Polls Measure So Much More than Voting Intentions

The polling community took a lot heat following the failure of forecasters and data journalists to predict Trump's triumph in the 2016 election. But polls measure so much more than voting intentions says Council senior fellow Dina Smeltz.


| By Karl Friedhoff, Craig Kafura

Public Opinion in the US and China

There is perhaps no more important bilateral relationship in the world today than the one between the United States and China—the world’s two most important players in terms of economics and security. Where do the Chinese and American publics stand on key issues in the relationship, and what policies do they want to see their respective nations pursue worldwide? 



| By Diana C. Mutz

How Trade Attitudes Changed from 2012-2016

Trade was an important issue in the recent presidential election, but not in the way the media and many prominent observers have led us to believe.  The dominant narrative in the media was that disgruntled manufacturing workers whose jobs had been sent overseas emerged, understandably, as trade’s strong opponents, thus making Trump with his strong anti-trade rhetoric their natural ally.


Who Run the World? Foreign Policy Attitudes on Women and Girls

In partnership with the New America Foundation, the 2016 Chicago Council Survey included two questions developed to provide better insight about the importance of promoting women's rights and women's participation in societies around the world. 


This Presidential Election Was All about Identity, Not Qualities and Issues

Donald Trump just pulled off one of the most stunning upsets in American political history, capturing the presidency last Tuesday night. How did it happen? This election was all about identity politics, with Trump able to connect with non-college whites, especially white men without a college degree.



| By Dina Smeltz

The US-Russian Relationship

The 2016 Chicago Council Survey partnered with the Levada Analytical Center in Moscow to ask Americans and Russians how they feel about each other and—more importantly—each other’s government. 


| By Richard C. Eichenberg

Gender Difference in Foreign Policy Opinions: Implications for 2016

There are three patterns in American politics that take on special significance in 2016: the gender divide in Presidential elections; the low support for Donald Trump among women; and the growing discussion in the foreign policy community about the inclusion of women in the policy process. Nonresident fellow Richard Eichenberg explores the extent of gender difference in the 2016 Chicago Council Survey data and assesses the relevance of any differences to this year’s presidential election.