June 17, 2015 | By Karl Friedhoff

President Obama's Australia Appeal

John Lennon famously declared the Beatles to be bigger than Jesus, and now it seems that President Obama is bigger than the Pope—at least in Australia. According to a new Lowy Institute report authored by Lowy’s polling director Alex Oliver, 86 percent of the Australian public cited admiration for President Obama with Pope Francis garnering a respectable 73 percent. In second place? Hillary Clinton with 77 percent.

President Obama’s popularity in Australia seems to have induced a recovery in the American reputation in the country. Under George W. Bush in 2007, just 36 percent of Australians cited the US alliance as very important to Australia’s security. In 2015, that number was 53 percent.

Skeptics may say that this increase could have come from any number of changes, the most likely source being shifting threat perceptions among the Australian public and a greater recognition of the role the United States plays in ameliorating those threats. The data seem to disagree.

In 2008, President Bush’s last in office, 42 percent cited the alliance with the United States as very important. In 2009, President Obama’s first year in office, that number jumped to 55 percent. In the 11 years that the Lowy Institute has been asking this question, no year-on-year change has been greater than 6 percentage points.

But couldn’t the increased standing of the United States in Australia be a result of the rise of China? Unlikely. Nearly eight-in-ten see China as more of an economic partner and fewer than two-in-ten see China as a military threat. According to the report, Australian sentiment towards China has remained relatively stable.

While the American and Australian publics apparently disagree on the qualities of President Obama (and Mrs. Clinton[1]) Mr. Obama’s tenure seems to have improved the standing of the United States in Australia. But those results are not universal. Pew’s Global Indicators Database suggests, unsurprisingly, that the image of the United States has declined in the Middle East while having improved in Europe and East Asia.

Of course, these polls cannot tell us if this improved image of the United States under President Obama in some parts of the world has made it easier for American officials, both at home and abroad, to accomplish US goals. For that, we need to hear from the officials themselves. If the recent past is any indication, there will be no shortage of source material in the very near future.
 
[1] No Republican candidates were included in the question, likely due to the fact that the poll was conducted from February 20 – March 8, 2015. At that point, no Republican candidate had enough name recognition or profile to warrant inclusion.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive

| By Bettina Hammer

Peace to Prosperity Misses the Mark with Palestinians

At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East and emphasized the U.S. commitment to the Palestinian people. The stated  goal of the Peace to Prosperity plan is “to empower the Palestinian people to build a better future for themselves and their children.” But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?



| By Dina Smeltz, Brendan Helm

Scholars vs the Public: Collapse of the INF Treaty

In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.

Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.



| By Craig Kafura

Expert Panel Survey: US Focus on the Denuclearization of North Korea

Despite expectations for the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un, their recent summit in Hanoi ended with no agreement toward denuclearization. With that in mind, we asked our panel of foreign policy experts whether the United States should continue to focus primarily on denuclearization, or shift to arms control and non-proliferation.



| By Dina Smeltz

Opinion Landscape Not Ideal for New Mideast Peace Plan

At a Middle East conference this month in Warsaw, Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and Mideast adviser, said that the administration will unveil its much-vaunted Middle East peace plan after the April 9 Israeli elections.


| By Karl Friedhoff

America the Dangerous

The Trump administration has taken a hard line on China, but has failed to convince the American public or many allies to follow suit. Instead, publics around the world now see the United States as a major threat.






| By Craig Kafura

2018: Year in Chicago Council Surveys

It's been a busy, eventful year around the world. Throughout 2018, the Council's polling team has captured public and opinion leader attitudes on some of the most pressing foreign policy issues, including US-Russia relations, American views of China, public support for internationalism and trade, and how the rising generation of Millennials think about American foreign policy.


| By Karl Friedhoff

Confidence in Congress Low

As the House becomes majority Democrat, there is low confidence among the American public for Congress--and several other institutions--to shape policies that benefit the United States.