May 13, 2019 | By Karl Friedhoff, Leena Kim

Moon's Approval Down, North Korea Not a Primary Driver

When South Korea’s president, Moon Jae-in, took office in June 2017 he did so with record-breaking approval rates above 80 percent. But as his presidency has continued there has been a steady decline, falling to 45 percent in a late April survey by Gallup Korea. This decline has sparked hand-wringing among many Korea watchers. A common refrain is that his support has collapsed, and his presidency may be near crisis. A second refrain is that his North Korea policy has proven unpopular and he is now taking the hit for his engagement policy. Just one problem: none of those things are supported by the data.

First, in the most recent polling data available, President Moon’s approval rates have indeed declined, but his approval rates do not differ significantly from previous presidents at the same points in their respective terms. While he started out higher than most previous presidents, he is now in the middle-of-the-pack in terms of historical approval rates.

Second, the reason for that decline does not appear to be tied to his North Korea policy.  In the survey, respondents were asked whether they approve or disapprove of President Moon’s handling of several issues facing the country. While the public is evenly divided on his North Korea policy, with 45 percent approval and 43 percent disapproval, they are much more disappointed with his handling of the economy, employment, and personnel affairs. Half or more disapprove of his management on each of these issues, especially on the economy.

Moreover, North Korea is not as high on the list of priorities for the South Korean public as is often imagined. Like publics around the world, there is far more interest on more clearly defined domestic issues. In a late 2018 poll, 59 percent said they wanted the president to focus on the economy (54%) or welfare (5%). Just 12 percent said the focus should be on peace on the Korean Peninsula (9%) or diplomacy with neighboring countries (3%).

President Moon’s approval rates are indeed sliding, but the reasons for this slide are knowable. It does not appear to be driven by his handling of North Korea. Instead, the South Korean public wants Moon to focus his efforts on the fragile economy. Recent North Korean missile launches are unlikely to change that desire.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive

| By Bettina Hammer

Peace to Prosperity Misses the Mark with Palestinians

At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East and emphasized the U.S. commitment to the Palestinian people. The stated  goal of the Peace to Prosperity plan is “to empower the Palestinian people to build a better future for themselves and their children.” But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?



| By Dina Smeltz, Brendan Helm

Scholars vs the Public: Collapse of the INF Treaty

In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.

Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.



| By Craig Kafura

Expert Panel Survey: US Focus on the Denuclearization of North Korea

Despite expectations for the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un, their recent summit in Hanoi ended with no agreement toward denuclearization. With that in mind, we asked our panel of foreign policy experts whether the United States should continue to focus primarily on denuclearization, or shift to arms control and non-proliferation.



| By Dina Smeltz

Opinion Landscape Not Ideal for New Mideast Peace Plan

At a Middle East conference this month in Warsaw, Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and Mideast adviser, said that the administration will unveil its much-vaunted Middle East peace plan after the April 9 Israeli elections.


| By Karl Friedhoff

America the Dangerous

The Trump administration has taken a hard line on China, but has failed to convince the American public or many allies to follow suit. Instead, publics around the world now see the United States as a major threat.






| By Craig Kafura

2018: Year in Chicago Council Surveys

It's been a busy, eventful year around the world. Throughout 2018, the Council's polling team has captured public and opinion leader attitudes on some of the most pressing foreign policy issues, including US-Russia relations, American views of China, public support for internationalism and trade, and how the rising generation of Millennials think about American foreign policy.


| By Karl Friedhoff

Confidence in Congress Low

As the House becomes majority Democrat, there is low confidence among the American public for Congress--and several other institutions--to shape policies that benefit the United States.