October 24, 2013 | By Dina Smeltz, Juliana Kerr

Money Talks: Midwest Businesses Support Immigration Reform

This morning, President Obama delivered a speech to the nation encouraging Congress to pass immigration reform before the end of the year. After quoting economic statistics to describe the positive impact reform will have on the nation, he noted “it is not just the right thing to do, but it is also the smart thing to do.” Citing broad support for reform from different sectors of society, including business leaders, he asked the nation to take a closer look at the polls: a clear majority of Americans think we should pass reforms.

The business community is traditionally considered to be politically conservative. Yet business leaders are generally viewed by activists to be a strong ally for immigration reform unlike conservatives in the House who oppose debating the Senate’s comprehensive immigration bill. Businesses need skilled workers to remain competitive and they want to be able to legally employ hard-working individuals with necessary talents no matter where they come from.

To better understand the views of business leaders in the Midwest region – a particularly challenging region for immigration advocacy – toward immigrants and immigration policies, their hiring practices, and the correlation with their political affiliations, The Chicago Council on Global Affairs commissioned a September 2013 survey among 500 Midwestern business leaders from small (0-100 employees), medium (101-999 employees) and large businesses (1,000 or more employees).

The results show that regardless of political affiliation, majorities of Midwest businesses support the Senate bill, including 75 percent of Republican Midwest business leaders (63% Democrat; 55% Independent) (Figure 1).  The question presented four key components in the Senate bill: increasing border security at a cost of $46 billion; identifying illegal immigrants; penalizing employers who hire them; and requiring illegal immigrants who qualify to stay to pay taxes and learn English before they can apply for citizenship after ten years.

A slim majority of Midwestern businesses support comprehensive immigration reform over passing reforms incrementally (Figure 2).  Fifty-three percent prefer to enact stricter border control and a path to legal status simultaneously now (including 55% of Republican Midwest business leaders, 53% Democrat and 50% Independent). The remainder is evenly divided between those who prefer that Congress enact border controls now and leave path to legal status for later (23%, higher among Republicans), and those who prefer that Congress enact a path to legal status now and enact border control later (22%, higher among Democrats).

While these questions signal fairly broad business support for comprehensive reform, survey questions that hone in specifically on providing a pathway to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants elicit somewhat greater reluctance from Republican business leaders. A sizable third of Republican business leaders in the Midwest say that unauthorized immigrant workers should be required to leave their jobs and leave the U.S. (33%, compared to 22% of Independent and 11% of Democrat Midwest business leaders) (Figure 3).  By the way, an April 2013 Chicago Council survey also found that one in three Midwestern residents (31%) also believe that unauthorized immigrants should be required to leave their jobs and the US.

Even though Republican Midwest business leaders support deportation more often than Democrats and Independents, the prevailing inclination among Republican Midwest business leaders is to support some type of legalization of unauthorized immigrants to stay in their jobs in the US:  51 percent of them support a pathway to citizenship either immediately or after paying a penalty and waiting, and an additional 18  percent favor giving them work permits without citizenship.  Midwest business leaders who identify as Democrat or Independent are much more inclined to support a path to citizenship.



Midwest business leaders are drivers of economic growth and have a lot at stake in the immigration debate.  Half of those surveyed say their company either currently (38%) employs legal immigrants or has in the past (11%).  Solid majorities say it is at least somewhat important for the country and the economy to allow more high-skill (74%) and low-skill (64%) foreign workers into this country legally. Yet it’s a big question mark whether this contentious issue will be resolved in the coming months. A full and detailed report of The Chicago Council’s 2013 Midwest Business Leader Survey will be released in November 2013. Visit MidwestImmigration.org for updates.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive


| By Jack Benjamin

6 Ways in Which Liberal and Moderate Democrats Diverge on Key Issues

Democratic primary season is well under way, highlighted by recent debates and battleground fundraising by the large field of presidential hopefuls. As candidates deliver their pitch to voters, party supporters are not in lockstep on every issue.


| By Ruby Scanlon

The Generational Divide Over Climate Change

America’s young and old are split on what to do about climate change, presenting a major hurdle for the country’s youth to attain serious and immediate action.









| By Bettina Hammer

Americans Aren't Fans of Arms Sales

The United States has long been the tops arms supplier in the world. Yet public opinion data shows that Americans aren’t fans of U.S. arms sales.


| By Bettina Hammer

Little Admiration for the United States among MENA Publics

Most Americans believe that respect and admiration for the United States are instrumental in achieving US foreign policy goals. But a new poll finds publics in the Middle East and North Africa continue to view the United States unfavorably. 


| By Bettina Hammer

Peace to Prosperity Misses the Mark with Palestinians

At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East. But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?



| By Dina Smeltz, Brendan Helm

Scholars vs the Public: Collapse of the INF Treaty

In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.

Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.