August 26, 2020 | By Brendan Helm

Urban, Suburban, and Rural Americans Agree on Key Issues Ahead of 2020 Election

As the United States moves ever closer to the 2020 election, the differences among Americans are being highlighted by commentators, pundits, and politicians alike. Of particular importance are the differences between Americans who live in urban, suburban, and rural areas, each of which are often characterized by predominant support one political party. However, data from the 2019 Chicago Council Survey revealed that certain issues which once divided those living in cities, suburbs, or the country have become sources of agreement. In particular, attitudes relating to international trade, climate change, and engagement with China have seen a sharp uptick in agreement over the past several years.

For the duration of the Trump administration, international trade been a hot topic as the United States has levied tariffs on imports from adversaries and partners alike, which has received a mixed reception from Americans. However, in terms of the attitudes of urban, suburban, and rural Americans toward the effects of international trade on the US economy, there has been a significant shift toward approval.

From 2016 to 2019, the proportion of urban, suburban, and rural residents who say that international trade is good for the US economy all increased by 25-percentage-points or more. For rural Americans, nearly twice as many in 2019 (85%) say that international trade is good compared to 2016 (47%). These increases across the board have brought each geography close to the same opinion with regard to the effects of international trade.

Urban, suburban, and rural Americans say that International trade is good for the US economy

While climate change, too, has remained a broadly controversial issue among Americans, attitudes toward how to handle it have begun to converge. While in 2016 pluralities of suburban (41%) and rural (43%) residents said that climate change should be addressed gradually with low cost steps, pluralities of rural (41%) residents and majorities of urban (55%) and suburban (50%) residents in 2019 said that climate change is a serious problem that requires immediate action, even if it is costly. This shift in attitudes is a significant change as the issue of climate change and how to address it has traditionally been an extremely divisive topic.

Compared to 2016, more Americans are willing to take immediate steps to combat climate change, regardless of the cost.

Finally, while the Trump administration has taken increasingly harsh policy positions vis-à-vis China, Americans in all areas of the country are still committed to diplomacy. Asked whether the United States should engage in friendly cooperation with China or actively work to limit their power, majorities of urban (68%), suburban (68%), and rural (64%) residents opt for cooperation and engagement with China.

Majorities of urban, suburban, and rural Americans prefer to undertake friendly cooperation and engagement with China.

As President Donald Trump and Democratic candidate Joe Biden approach the debates leading up to November 3, they would do well to acknowledge the growing consensus on these issues among Americans. Ignoring these signs could mean defeat in one of the most contentious elections in recent history.

For more information on the opinions of urban, suburban, and rural Americans, read the Chicago Council’s new report, “From an Urban-Suburban-Rural “Divide” to Convergence?


The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.


On his Europe trip, Trump will be crossing into hostile territory

Donald Trump kicked off his second official foreign tour today in Warsaw, Poland, giving a speech condemning Russian aggression amid a crowd enthusiastic about its government’s show of friendship with the US leader. For Trump, this first stop will likely be the easy part.

#TBT 1974: #NOTNixonian

Is the US public turning on President Donald Trump like it turned on former President Richard Nixon? Running Numbers is digging out its archived polls to look back at Nixon’s approval ratings compared to those of Trump to see whether US public opinion is following a similar path.

Heading into Brexit talks, Britain is as divided as ever

On the heels of the shocking General Election outcome, the UK-EU Brexit negotiations have begun. But the road ahead for these talks is far from smooth: recent polling indicates that the public is increasingly split on what exactly would qualify as an acceptable deal.

| By Craig Kafura

UK General Election 2017: Parliament and Polls Hung Out to Dry

As the results of the United Kingdom’s snap election filtered in last Friday, most headlines echoed shock: Theresa May and her Conservative Party had lost the large majority in Parliament that seemed almost guaranteed just a few weeks ago. What drove this shocking shift? Did anyone see it coming?

Trump’s Paris Pullout: Not Popular with US Public

President Trump recently announced that he plans on pulling the United States out of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, a decision that is out of step with the views of the public. According to a number of surveys conducted over the past year, a majority of Americans support US participation in the agreement.

| By Dina Smeltz

The Urban-Rural Divide?

Are Americans as divided along geographic lines when it comes to key foreign policy matters as their voting patterns suggest? 

| By Karl Friedhoff

Moon Jae-In's Victory Does Not Put US-Korea Alliance at Risk

With the election of Moon Jae-In to the presidency of South Korea, there are concerns that the US-Korea alliance hangs in the balance. Those fears are overblown. While there are rough waters ahead, much of that will emanate from the Trump administration's handling of cost-sharing negotiations in the near future.

| By Dina Smeltz

The Foreign Policy Blob Is Bigger Than You Think

The Blob isn't just science fiction. When it comes to US foreign policy, its reach is far and wide with wide swaths of agreement between foreign policy elite and the general public. A new report from the Council and the Texas National Security Network explains.

| By Dina Smeltz

American Views of Israel Reveal Partisan and Generational Divides

Despite partisan differences on taking a side in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and on the status of US-Israel bilateral relations, overall trends from Chicago Council Survey data indicate that the relationship between the United States and Israel will continue to be viewed warmly by the American public.

#TBT: That Time We All Feared Chemical and Biological Weapons

In the spirit of Throw Back Thursday, Running Numbers is digging out its archived polls to look back at America’s foreign policy feelings of old. This week, we’re looking at Council data on Americans' perceptions of the threat posed by chemical and biological weapons in the late 90s and early 00s.

| By Dina Smeltz

​Polls Measure So Much More than Voting Intentions

The polling community took a lot heat following the failure of forecasters and data journalists to predict Trump's triumph in the 2016 election. But polls measure so much more than voting intentions says Council senior fellow Dina Smeltz.

| By Karl Friedhoff, Craig Kafura

Public Opinion in the US and China

There is perhaps no more important bilateral relationship in the world today than the one between the United States and China—the world’s two most important players in terms of economics and security. Where do the Chinese and American publics stand on key issues in the relationship, and what policies do they want to see their respective nations pursue worldwide?