August 26, 2019 | By Leena Kim

Mexicans Less Receptive to Central American Migrants

Mexico has been a conduit for Central American migrants to reach to the US border for many years. However, deteriorating conditions in the Northern Triangle countries of Central America (Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras) have led to even more central American migrants traveling through Mexico in recent years. At the same time, the Trump administration has greatly restricted the ability of these central American migrants to enter the United States, and had threatened Mexico with trade tariffs unless it agreed to allow them to stay in Mexico while awaiting asylum hearings. Currently, at least 13,000 central American migrants are waiting for those hearings in Mexico.

These pressures from its northern and southern borders have impacted Mexican opinion of migrants from Central America. According to a survey by a Mexican press outlet El Universal in October 2018, nearly a half of Mexicans (47%) were in favor of receiving migrants and giving them refugee status. But by April 2019, a second survey found only three in ten (29%) in favor. In the same vein, a majority of Mexicans (58%) agreed with the government to stop the flow of undocumented migrants in 2019 survey, while only 36 percent had agreed in the fall of 2018.

The migration dispute is also affecting Mexican views of migrants more broadly. Six in ten Mexicans (64%) think migrants from Central America are a burden, according to a July 9-14, 2019 survey conducted by The Washington Post and Reforma. Moreover, a plurality of Mexicans (39%) think migrants commit more crimes than native-born Mexicans, and half (51%) are in favor of the National Guard being used to combat undocumented migration in Mexico. When they were asked what Mexico should do with Central American migrants passing through Mexico, a majority (55%) said Mexico should deport them to their countries of origin, with one-third (33%) supporting giving them temporary residency, and seven percent in favor of giving them residency in Mexico.

Central American migrants are stuck between the Trump administration's hardline immigration policy and an increasingly unfriendly Mexican public. Yet given the conflict and instability in their home countries, they're likely to keep coming.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive







| By Bettina Hammer

Americans Aren't Fans of Arms Sales

The United States has long been the tops arms supplier in the world. Yet public opinion data shows that Americans aren’t fans of U.S. arms sales.


| By Bettina Hammer

Little Admiration for the United States among MENA Publics

Most Americans believe that respect and admiration for the United States are instrumental in achieving US foreign policy goals. But a new poll finds publics in the Middle East and North Africa continue to view the United States unfavorably. 


| By Bettina Hammer

Peace to Prosperity Misses the Mark with Palestinians

At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East. But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?



| By Dina Smeltz, Brendan Helm

Scholars vs the Public: Collapse of the INF Treaty

In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.

Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.



| By Craig Kafura

Expert Panel Survey: US Focus on the Denuclearization of North Korea

Despite expectations for the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un, their recent summit in Hanoi ended with no agreement toward denuclearization. With that in mind, we asked our panel of foreign policy experts whether the United States should continue to focus primarily on denuclearization, or shift to arms control and non-proliferation.



| By Dina Smeltz

Opinion Landscape Not Ideal for New Mideast Peace Plan

At a Middle East conference this month in Warsaw, Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and Mideast adviser, said that the administration will unveil its much-vaunted Middle East peace plan after the April 9 Israeli elections.