December 18, 2019 | By Craig Kafura

Japanese Public Glad to See GSOMIA Stay In Place

2019 was a rough year for Japan-South Korea relations. The most recent downturn in relations began when the South Korean Supreme Court ruled in November 2018 that former wartime laborers would be allowed to sue Japanese companies for compensation. Japan argued that this move was a violation of the 1965 treaty re-establishing formal relations between the two countries.

 

Tensions between these two key US allies in Asia raised serious alarms in Washington in late August 2019 when South Korean President Moon announced he planned to terminate the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) agreement, which provides for intelligence sharing between Japan and South Korea. As American officials warned, terminating the agreement would affect US security and America’s ability to defend its South Korean ally.

 

But hours before the agreement was due to expire on November 22, Seoul pulled back from the brink, suspending its decision to terminate GSOMIA. A Kyodo News poll conducted November 23-24, immediately following the decision, found two-thirds of Japanese (66%) reported they were relieved that the termination had been avoided.

 

Avoiding this serious breach in Japan-Korea relations may have stopped the downward spiral, but prospects for improvement are less clear.

 

A December 6-8 NHK poll finds that six in ten Japanese (62%) do not think that Japan-Korea relations are going to improve, compared to 16 percent who think they will. When asked which country should compromise in order to improve relations, roughly half (49%) said both Japan and South Korea needed to compromise. Among the other half, three in ten (28%) pointed solely to South Korea, five percent solely to Japan, and 11 percent replied that improving Japan-Korea relations is unnecessary. And the pace of any improvement may be slow: according to a December 7-8 poll by JNN, two-thirds of Japanese (67%) say there is no urgent need to make concessions to improve the Japan-Korea relationship.

 

South Korean President Moon and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe are due to meet next week at a trilateral summit in Chengdu, China, their first formal summit in over a year. Improving relations will certainly be on the agenda. But the Japanese public is skeptical that the summit will help: in a December 13-15 Yomiuri Shimbun poll, only 16 percent think the coming summit between Abe and Moon will improve Japan-Korea relations, while three in four (74%) think it will not. It could be a long road to reconciliation.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive

| By Diana C. Mutz

How Trade Attitudes Changed from 2012-2016

Trade was an important issue in the recent presidential election, but not in the way the media and many prominent observers have led us to believe.  The dominant narrative in the media was that disgruntled manufacturing workers whose jobs had been sent overseas emerged, understandably, as trade’s strong opponents, thus making Trump with his strong anti-trade rhetoric their natural ally.


Who Run the World? Foreign Policy Attitudes on Women and Girls

In partnership with the New America Foundation, the 2016 Chicago Council Survey included two questions developed to provide better insight about the importance of promoting women's rights and women's participation in societies around the world. 


This Presidential Election Was All about Identity, Not Qualities and Issues

Donald Trump just pulled off one of the most stunning upsets in American political history, capturing the presidency last Tuesday night. How did it happen? This election was all about identity politics, with Trump able to connect with non-college whites, especially white men without a college degree.



| By Dina Smeltz

The US-Russian Relationship

The 2016 Chicago Council Survey partnered with the Levada Analytical Center in Moscow to ask Americans and Russians how they feel about each other and—more importantly—each other’s government. 


| By Richard C. Eichenberg

Gender Difference in Foreign Policy Opinions: Implications for 2016

There are three patterns in American politics that take on special significance in 2016: the gender divide in Presidential elections; the low support for Donald Trump among women; and the growing discussion in the foreign policy community about the inclusion of women in the policy process. Nonresident fellow Richard Eichenberg explores the extent of gender difference in the 2016 Chicago Council Survey data and assesses the relevance of any differences to this year’s presidential election.







The Surprising Popularity of Trade

Results from the 2016 Chicago Council Survey reveal that international trade and globalization remain popular with the American public. 



| By Dina Smeltz, Karl Friedhoff

On Terrorism, Americans See No End in Sight

The June 10-27 Chicago Council Survey finds that the American public considers international terrorism to be the most critical threat facing the nation. In combating terrorism Americans say that almost all options should be on the table, yet a large majority expect that occasional acts of terror will be a part of life in the future.


| By Dina Smeltz, Craig Kafura

Americans Support Limited Military Action in Syria

The 2016 Chicago Council Survey, conducted June 10-27, reveals that Americans across partisan lines support limited military actions in Syria that combine air strikes and the use of Special Operations Forces. There are deep partisan divides on accepting Syrian refugees, and widespread skepticism toward arming anti-government groups or negotiating a deal that would leave President Assad in power.