June 20, 2017

Heading into Brexit talks, Britain is as divided as ever

By Karen Whisler

Negotiations over Brexit began Monday in Brussels, with UK representative David Davis meeting with French foreign minister Michel Barnier to initiate a process towards the goal of Britain’s formal withdraw from the EU by March 2019. However, the road ahead for these talks is far from smooth. Still reeling from a disastrous election last week, Theresa May and her Conservatives are now tasked with formulating a Brexit deal that will be palatable for the public they represent. However, recent polling indicates that the public is increasingly split on what exactly would qualify as an acceptable deal.

After a tumultuous year, the nation that voted for Brexit last summer seems to be suffering from some buyer’s remorse. Just before that fateful decision, a 44 percent minority of people in the UK held a favorable view of the European Union; today that proportion has ticked up to 54 percent. Contrast this with a pessimistic attitude pervading with regards to Britain’s future: a plurality – 48 percent – of citizens now think that the impending Brexit will be bad for the country.

Yet the leader of the nation has been relatively consistent in what she considers the will of the people. For PM May the ideal outcome of the talks would be a “hard Brexit”, or complete separation from the EU customs union and single market. Yet a poll by Survation over the weekend shows that this approach is far from the public’s will. Only one in four Britons surveyed favored leaving the customs union, which would forfeit UK and EU companies’ automatic rights to free trade in the EU and UK, respectively. Even May’s own Tory public is divided on the issue with 45 percent in favor and 44 percent opposed. The tide has instead turned towards a measured approach. A plurality of respondents preferred “soft Brexit” – in the Survation poll, paying a fee to the EU for access to the customs union and maintaining the right to free trade between the two powers. The remaining 25 percent would rather go back on the Brexit decision altogether and remain a part of the EU.

Then there is May’s hardline assertion written into her Conservative Party manifesto: “we continue to believe that no deal is better than a bad deal for the UK.” If the negotiations in Brussels don’t turn out the way she wants, the Prime Minister is ready to simply walk away and leave the EU with no formal terms at all. As for the British people themselves, many believe that call should not be up to her.

The same poll by Survation found that nearly half the country would rather hold a referendum for the public to decide whether to accept the Brexit deal. The breakdown of support for that vote is particularly striking: among Conservatives only a quarter favor such a proposal; for Labour voters it’s more than two-thirds. For 18 to 34 year-olds, referendum support is 55 percent to 34, whereas the numbers are a near-perfect reverse for those 55 and older. As seen in the General Election earlier this month, the UK has become a nation with deep divisions across lines of party and age. These referendum numbers in particular highlight how much Britain’s youth – who turned out in record numbers to vote overwhelmingly for Labour last week –mistrust their nation’s embattled Tory government. If PM May does refuse the terms of the yet-to-be-negotiated agreement, 60 percent of young people have said that they will not accept her judgement.

What about the other side of the negotiation table? If and when the UK does exit the EU, almost 70 percent of Europeans predict the union will be hurt. But overall there’s little chance of a mass exodus from the 23-year-old institution. No nation on the continent has anything close to a majority of people wanting to follow Britain’s lead, and the only population holding a generally negative opinion of the EU is Greece. Further, most agree that any Brexit deal is bound to hurt Britain overall.

For now, Europeans seem to take the stance that they are stronger united, even in the face of economic and immigration woes.

 

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive








| By Bettina Hammer

Americans Aren't Fans of Arms Sales

The United States has long been the tops arms supplier in the world. Yet public opinion data shows that Americans aren’t fans of U.S. arms sales.


| By Bettina Hammer

Little Admiration for the United States among MENA Publics

Most Americans believe that respect and admiration for the United States are instrumental in achieving US foreign policy goals. But a new poll finds publics in the Middle East and North Africa continue to view the United States unfavorably. 


| By Bettina Hammer

Peace to Prosperity Misses the Mark with Palestinians

At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East. But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?



| By Dina Smeltz, Brendan Helm

Scholars vs the Public: Collapse of the INF Treaty

In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.

Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.



| By Craig Kafura

Expert Panel Survey: US Focus on the Denuclearization of North Korea

Despite expectations for the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un, their recent summit in Hanoi ended with no agreement toward denuclearization. With that in mind, we asked our panel of foreign policy experts whether the United States should continue to focus primarily on denuclearization, or shift to arms control and non-proliferation.