November 20, 2014 | By Craig Kafura

Executive Action: Immigration Policy and Politics

President Obama has announced that he is taking executive action on immigration, a move that could protect millions of undocumented immigrants from deportation. In anticipation of that announcement, I discussed the Council’s findings on immigration with David Bender, executive director of the American Council of Engineering Companies of Illinois, Cathleen Farrell, director of communications for the National Immigration Forum, and Juliana Kerr, director of the Council’s Immigration Initiative. One question on everyone's mind was the public's reaction to such a move, and what long-term trends in public opinion can tell us about how executive action will sit with the American people. 
 
When the Chicago Council Surveys first began asking questions about immigration in 1994, seven in ten Americans (72%) said controlling and reducing illegal immigration was a very important goal; the same percentage said that large numbers of immigrants and refugees coming into the US represented a critical threat. Since then, both measures of concern have fallen dramatically. And while media coverage of this summer’s child migrant crisis produced a spike in concern over immigration, that concern fell off as news coverage faded: the Chicago Council’s May and October polls showed no significant differences on threat perception or enforcement prioritization.
 
Figure 1 - Declining public concern over immigration
 
Widening Partisan Divisions on Immigration
Behind this long-term decline is a large—and growing—partisan divide on immigration. Democrats are dramatically less concerned about immigration than they were in the late 1990s. Then, six in ten Democrats said large numbers of immigrants and refugees coming into the US represented a critical threat. That number has been cut in half. In October, only three in ten said the same. Independents show a similar pattern: they’re somewhat less concerned about immigration than they used to be, falling from 51 percent in the late 1990s to 41 percent now. By contrast, Republicans’ level of concern has held steady, with slightly more than half saying it represents a critical threat.
 
Figure 2 - Growing partisan divides on immigration as a critical threat
 
Similarly, Democrats have become less likely to say that controlling and reducing illegal immigration is very important – from more than half to about one in three today. Notably, this summer’s events didn’t affect Democrats’ views on prioritization of enforcement. By contrast, Republicans are actually more likely to prioritize controlling and reducing illegal immigration now than they were in the late 1990s. And this summer had a stronger effect on Republicans. In May, six in ten said controlling and reducing illegal immigration was very important. In October, 74% said the same – an increase of thirteen percentage points.
 
Figure 3 - Growing partisan divides on importance of controlling and reducing illegal immigration

The Policy and Politics of Immigration Reform
These trends in American public opinion help explain the strong support for comprehensive immigration reform that past Council surveys have found. The 2012 Chicago Council Survey found that 78 percent of Americans favored a version of immigration reform that combined a path to citizenship requiring payment of back taxes and learning English with increased) border security and penalties for employers who hire unauthorized immigrants. Similarly, the Council's August 2013 survey of 500 business leaders from the 12-state Midwest found that majorities of Republican (75%), Democratic (63%), and Independent (55%) business leaders supported comprehensive immigration reform that included a path to citizenship combined with stricter border control. Other polls have shown similar results, with support varying depending on how the question is worded
 
Despite this broad support for immigration reform, the NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey released yesterday found that roughly half of Americans (48%) say they oppose Obama taking executive action on immigration, while four in ten (38%) support it. Partisan views on executive action are polarized: 63 percent of Democrats favor executive action, while only 11 percent of Republicans say the same (Independents lie in the middle at 37% support).
 
What explains the gap between the two? These results on executive action reflect the politics of the decision, rather than the policy. The same NBC/WSJ poll found that a majority of Americans (57%) favor a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, and three in four Americans (74%) favor a pathway when told it requires paying fines and back taxes, as well as passing a security background check—roughly the same as past Chicago Council Survey findings.
 
Executive action may prove to be a policy act in which the content is more popular than the overall decision. It remains to be seen which the voters care about more.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive








| By Bettina Hammer

Americans Aren't Fans of Arms Sales

The United States has long been the tops arms supplier in the world. Yet public opinion data shows that Americans aren’t fans of U.S. arms sales.


| By Bettina Hammer

Little Admiration for the United States among MENA Publics

Most Americans believe that respect and admiration for the United States are instrumental in achieving US foreign policy goals. But a new poll finds publics in the Middle East and North Africa continue to view the United States unfavorably. 


| By Bettina Hammer

Peace to Prosperity Misses the Mark with Palestinians

At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East. But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?



| By Dina Smeltz, Brendan Helm

Scholars vs the Public: Collapse of the INF Treaty

In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.

Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.



| By Craig Kafura

Expert Panel Survey: US Focus on the Denuclearization of North Korea

Despite expectations for the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un, their recent summit in Hanoi ended with no agreement toward denuclearization. With that in mind, we asked our panel of foreign policy experts whether the United States should continue to focus primarily on denuclearization, or shift to arms control and non-proliferation.