October 31, 2017 | By Dina Hanania, Craig Kafura

Do Core Trump Supporters Differ from Others in their Approaches towards the Syrian Conflict?

Along the campaign trail and following President Trump’s inauguration, commentators have painted core Trump supporters as isolationists largely disinterested in engaging in conflicts abroad. Yet, the 2017 Chicago Council Survey finds that when compared to the overall public, core Trump supporters – those Americans who express a very favorable view of Donald Trump -- are more willing than others to engage in military action in Syria. 

A large majority of core Trump supporters, similar to Republicans overall, support US military action against violent Islamic extremist groups in Syria by conducting US airstrikes and a smaller but sizable majority support sending combat troops into Syria. While such findings align with the public’s prioritization of terrorism as a critical threat to the United States and Trump’s aggressive rhetoric on confronting the Islamic State, both run counter to the common perception of Trump’s supporters desiring a more isolationist approach to world affairs. 

Core Trump supporters are also more willing to intervene militarily against President Bashar Al-Assad’s regime than Americans overall. A majority (59%) of core Trump supporters favor conducting airstrikes against President Assad’s regime, compared to a minority (45%) of the overall public. Additionally, 38 percent of core Trump supporters favor sending combat troops into Syria to forcibly remove Assad from power, while only 28 percent of the overall public supports doing so. In their willingness to use force against the Assad regime, Trump supporters are relatively on par with Republicans.

As outlined in the Council’s What Americans Think about America First report, a wide majority of core Trump supporters support US intervention to stop or prevent a government from using chemical or biological weapons against its own people (80% core Trump supporters, 74% overall public) , to deal with a humanitarian crisis (56% core Trump supporters, 67% overall public), and to fight against violent Islamic extremist groups in Iraq and Syria (76% core Trump supporters, 63% overall). Far from backing away from military interventions, core Trump supporters express more support than most Americans for a military intervention in the highly-complex Syrian conflict. Such results call for the reassessment of the common portrayal of core Trump supporters as committed isolationists.  

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive


The Surprising Popularity of Trade

Results from the 2016 Chicago Council Survey reveal that international trade and globalization remain popular with the American public. 



| By Dina Smeltz, Karl Friedhoff

On Terrorism, Americans See No End in Sight

The June 10-27 Chicago Council Survey finds that the American public considers international terrorism to be the most critical threat facing the nation. In combating terrorism Americans say that almost all options should be on the table, yet a large majority expect that occasional acts of terror will be a part of life in the future.


| By Dina Smeltz, Craig Kafura

Americans Support Limited Military Action in Syria

The 2016 Chicago Council Survey, conducted June 10-27, reveals that Americans across partisan lines support limited military actions in Syria that combine air strikes and the use of Special Operations Forces. There are deep partisan divides on accepting Syrian refugees, and widespread skepticism toward arming anti-government groups or negotiating a deal that would leave President Assad in power. 



| By Dina Smeltz, Karl Friedhoff, Craig Kafura

Republicans Back Trump, but Not All of his Policies

If the general election were held today, a solid majority of Republicans (including self-described Republicans and Republican-leaning Independents) say they would vote for Mr. Trump in the presidential contest against Secretary Clinton. But Donald Trump was not the top choice for many Republicans among the full field of primary candidates. While eventually deciding to back Trump, those who were hoping for a different nominee are not endorsing some of Trump’s key positions.


| By Karl Friedhoff

Flare-ups in Taiwan-China Relations Here to Stay

The China-Taiwan relationship may be due for flare-ups in the coming years, and China's recent decision to suspend diplomatic contact with Taiwan could set the tone for the short-term direction of cross-strait relations. But polling suggests that the Taiwanese public prefers a pragmatic approach to relations with China, limiting the publicly palatable options facing Taiwan's President Tsai, Karl Friedhoff writes.


Nuclear Energy: Americans Favor Stagnation

How do Americans feel about nuclear energy? From Chernobyl to Homer Simpson, nuclear energy doesn’t have a stunning reputation, but until recently polls showed a majority of Americans favor its use for energy. In fact it appears that support for nuclear energy is linked with energy availability and that Americans would rather develop other energy sources.






The British Debate on Nuclear Disarmament

Last month the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, a UK group founded in 1958, held its largest rally since 1983. Yet disarmament remains unpopular amongst the general public.