October 31, 2017 | By Dina Hanania, Craig Kafura

Do Core Trump Supporters Differ from Others in their Approaches towards the Syrian Conflict?

Along the campaign trail and following President Trump’s inauguration, commentators have painted core Trump supporters as isolationists largely disinterested in engaging in conflicts abroad. Yet, the 2017 Chicago Council Survey finds that when compared to the overall public, core Trump supporters – those Americans who express a very favorable view of Donald Trump -- are more willing than others to engage in military action in Syria. 

A large majority of core Trump supporters, similar to Republicans overall, support US military action against violent Islamic extremist groups in Syria by conducting US airstrikes and a smaller but sizable majority support sending combat troops into Syria. While such findings align with the public’s prioritization of terrorism as a critical threat to the United States and Trump’s aggressive rhetoric on confronting the Islamic State, both run counter to the common perception of Trump’s supporters desiring a more isolationist approach to world affairs. 

Core Trump supporters are also more willing to intervene militarily against President Bashar Al-Assad’s regime than Americans overall. A majority (59%) of core Trump supporters favor conducting airstrikes against President Assad’s regime, compared to a minority (45%) of the overall public. Additionally, 38 percent of core Trump supporters favor sending combat troops into Syria to forcibly remove Assad from power, while only 28 percent of the overall public supports doing so. In their willingness to use force against the Assad regime, Trump supporters are relatively on par with Republicans.

As outlined in the Council’s What Americans Think about America First report, a wide majority of core Trump supporters support US intervention to stop or prevent a government from using chemical or biological weapons against its own people (80% core Trump supporters, 74% overall public) , to deal with a humanitarian crisis (56% core Trump supporters, 67% overall public), and to fight against violent Islamic extremist groups in Iraq and Syria (76% core Trump supporters, 63% overall). Far from backing away from military interventions, core Trump supporters express more support than most Americans for a military intervention in the highly-complex Syrian conflict. Such results call for the reassessment of the common portrayal of core Trump supporters as committed isolationists.  

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive


| By Jack Benjamin

6 Ways in Which Liberal and Moderate Democrats Diverge on Key Issues

Democratic primary season is well under way, highlighted by recent debates and battleground fundraising by the large field of presidential hopefuls. As candidates deliver their pitch to voters, party supporters are not in lockstep on every issue.


| By Ruby Scanlon

The Generational Divide Over Climate Change

America’s young and old are split on what to do about climate change, presenting a major hurdle for the country’s youth to attain serious and immediate action.









| By Bettina Hammer

Americans Aren't Fans of Arms Sales

The United States has long been the tops arms supplier in the world. Yet public opinion data shows that Americans aren’t fans of U.S. arms sales.


| By Bettina Hammer

Little Admiration for the United States among MENA Publics

Most Americans believe that respect and admiration for the United States are instrumental in achieving US foreign policy goals. But a new poll finds publics in the Middle East and North Africa continue to view the United States unfavorably. 


| By Bettina Hammer

Peace to Prosperity Misses the Mark with Palestinians

At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East. But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?



| By Dina Smeltz, Brendan Helm

Scholars vs the Public: Collapse of the INF Treaty

In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.

Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.