October 5, 2016 | By Karl Friedhoff

Americans Remain Positive on Relations with South Korea

South Korea and its relationship with the United States has become an issue in the 2016 US presidential election. Donald Trump has repeatedly included South Korea in a group that he considers free-riding allies, unwilling to contribute more to their own defense. That criticism, however, has done little to dampen support for the US-Korea alliance in the United States. In fact, in a series of questions in the 2016 Chicago Council Survey—conducted June 10-27, 2016—American attitudes toward South Korea and our military alliance remain positive.

The United States has maintained military bases in South Korea since the end of the Korean War (1950-1953), and there are currently 28,500 troops in the country. Under the current Special Measures Agreement, South Korea pays roughly $860 million per year for the stationing of these troops. Along with other contributions, this amounts to roughly 45 percent of non-personnel costs.[1]

While the American public at large may not be aware of the details of these contributions, three quarters (72%) of Americans say that US relations with South Korea are either staying about the same (58%) or improving (14%). At the same time, support for maintaining military bases in South Korea is at an all-time high. In the 2016 survey, fully 70 percent state that the United States should maintain long-term bases in South Korea, up from 64 percent in 2015.

Even more striking, there is strong support across political party affiliation. Republicans (76%), Democrats (70%), and Independents (64%) all support bases in South Korea. That support even extends to Trump supporters (72%).


 

One reason for this increased support appears to be the growing perception of North Korea as a critical threat to the United States. In 2016, six in ten Americans think that North Korea’s nuclear program is a critical threat to the United States. That trails only international terrorism (75% critical) and is virtually tied with the possibility of unfriendly countries becoming nuclear powers (61%) on a list of 13 possible threats. For North Korea’s nuclear program, this is a 5 percentage point increase from 2015 when the question was first asked.

Among those that cite North Korea’s nuclear program as a threat, 75 percent support long-term bases in South Korea. For those that think it is an important but not critical threat support for bases falls to 63 percent. And among those that think it is not an important threat, a minority (45%) support bases.

As noted in a previous post, Americans support a range of options in dealing with North Korea’s nuclear program, as shown in Figure 2.


 

Of course, there is little affinity among Americans for North Korea. In fact, North Korea was the least favored country among Americans on a list of 12 countries. On a scale of 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest possible favorability, North Korea (19) was the only country to fall below 20. The next closest country was Iran at 26.

In contrast, the favorability of South Korea remains at its highest recorded value (55) since the question was first asked in 1978. That favorability also extends to Korean immigrants living in the United States. Two-thirds (67%) of Americans have a favorable view of Korean immigrants.

Taken together, this data suggests that the campaign rhetoric that has taken aim at South Korea has not negatively impacted views of South Korea or of the US-Korea alliance. In fact, it seems that the American public would welcome closer cooperation between the two countries.

 

[1] Mark Manyin, et. al. “U.S.-South Korea Relations”. Congressional Research Service. April 26, 2016.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy. 

The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion. 

The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.

Archive

| By Karl Friedhoff

America the Dangerous

The Trump administration has taken a hard line on China, but has failed to convince the American public or many allies to follow suit. Instead, publics around the world now see the United States as a major threat.






| By Craig Kafura

2018: Year in Chicago Council Surveys

It's been a busy, eventful year around the world. Throughout 2018, the Council's polling team has captured public and opinion leader attitudes on some of the most pressing foreign policy issues, including US-Russia relations, American views of China, public support for internationalism and trade, and how the rising generation of Millennials think about American foreign policy.


| By Karl Friedhoff

Confidence in Congress Low

As the House becomes majority Democrat, there is low confidence among the American public for Congress--and several other institutions--to shape policies that benefit the United States.



| By Craig Kafura

Public Support for Foreign Aid Programs

Past surveys have found that Americans want to cut US spending on foreign assistance and dramatically overestimate how much the US spends on those programs. When asked to construct their own US budget in the 2018 Chicago Council Survey, Americans allocate far more than the US actually spends. 




| By James Drimalla

Bleak Outlook on US-Russia Relations

A new joint report by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and the Levada Analytical Center finds experts have little hope for US-Russia relations in the near future.


| By James Drimalla

Millennials' Divergent Views on Global Affairs

Attitudes and beliefs frequently change from generation to generation and a new joint study from the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, CATO Institute, and Charles Koch Institute explores generational differences between the American public on foreign policy issues.



| By Karl Friedhoff

Consequences of Success on the Korean Peninsula

The April 27 inter-Korean summit was largely successful in the eyes of the South Korean public. It has created momentary trust in North Korea, and if that lasts, may lead the public to ask serious questions about the US-South Korea alliance.