Energy a top priority for Americans
Americans have long considered securing adequate supplies of energy a top goal for US foreign policy. Going back decades to the first Chicago Council Survey in 1974, majorities have rated securing energy supplies a very important goal (66% in 2014 and 75% in 1974). In the 2014 survey, it ranks second only to protecting the jobs of American workers. In addition, since 2010, three in four say that reducing US dependence on foreign oil is a very important goal (74% today).
The public has been slower to recognize the attendant issue of climate change, although more now than in the past four years view limiting climate change is a very important goal (41% compared to 33% in 2012, 35% in 2010, 42% in 2008). If the views of American academic, government and business leaders make an impact on public opinion, concern about climate change among the public could rise. New results from a 2014 Chicago Council Leaders Survey show that leaders, like the public, also emphasize securing energy supplies as a top priority.  But leaders also consider climate change a top threat and say that limiting climate change should be one of the highest goals for US foreign policy.
Emphasis on developing renewables, especially if business or government picks up the bill
According to a Nuclear Energy Institute Survey conducted in March 2014, the most important public considerations for the way electricity is produced has little to do with climate change. Americans prioritize reliability (83%), clean air (80%), affordable pricing (77%) and efficiency (76%), followed by energy security (72%), job creation (65%) and economic growth (64%). A solution to climate change is the least important item (51%).
Still Americans across the political spectrum favor measures that emphasize the development of alternative energy and energy conservation. Somewhat surprisingly, the Chicago Council results show that the most popular of the proposals presented is maintaining existing nuclear power plants to reduce reliance on oil and coal (76%). Other polls show that support for building new nuclear power plants is much lower. For example, a 2014 Gallup Poll found that 51 percent oppose expanding the use of nuclear energy (47% favor it).
Americans favor tax incentives as well as requirements on auto manufacturers. Seven in ten favor increasing tax incentives to encourage the development and use of alternative energy sources, such as solar or wind power (73%) and requiring auto-makers to increase fuel efficiency, even if this means the price of cars would go up (69%). Two thirds also favor opening up land owned by the federal government for oil exploration (65%). Gallup poll results from this year also show that two in three Americans favor setting higher emissions and pollution standards for business and industry (65%, down from 84% in 2007) and imposing mandatory controls on carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases (63% down from 79% in 2007).
Smaller majorities support increasing the use of hydraulic fracturing to extract oil and natural gas from underground rock formations (56%) and increasing the mining and use of coal for generating electricity (55%). The sole proposal in the Chicago Council Survey that Americans oppose is raising taxes on fuels such as coal and oil to encourage individuals and businesses to use less (34% favor, 63% oppose), a cost they would have to bear personally.
Americans Expect Major Shifts in Energy Supply in Next Ten years
While these results show that Americans favor continuing the development of fossil fuels, larger numbers prefer alternative types of energy and conservation. Gallup also found that when asked to choose between the two, twice as many Americans emphasize the development of alternative energy production, such as wind and solar power, to the production of more oil, gas and coal supplies (64% to 32%). And in fact, somewhat surprisingly, Americans expect that renewable energy will make up the bulk of the energy supply in a decade. The Nuclear Energy Institute Survey found that when asked which of several energy sources will be the primary source of electricity in ten years, top responses include solar energy (26%), natural gas (18%), wind power (17%) and nuclear energy (15%). No more than one in ten names hydroelectric power (9%), coal (8%) or oil (5%), although coal and gas currently comprise more than two thirds of US electricity generation today.
The 2014 Chicago Council Leaders Survey was conducted online among a random sample of academics, government officials, congressional staffers, business leaders, journalists and religious leaders in the United States. A full report is forthcoming.
The Chicago Council on Global Affairs highlights critical shifts in American public thinking on US foreign policy through public opinion surveys and research conducted under the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy.
The annual Chicago Council Survey, first conducted in 1974, is a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, media, and the general public. The Council also surveys American leaders in government, business, academia, think tanks, and religious organizations biennially to compare trends in their thinking with overall trends. And collaborating with partner organizations, the survey team periodically conducts parallel surveys of public opinion in other regions of the world to compare with US public opinion.
The Running Numbers blog features regular commentary and analysis from the Council’s public opinion and US foreign policy research team, including a series of flash polls of a select group of foreign policy experts to assess their opinions on critical foreign policy topics driving the news.
At the June 25-26 Bahrain Peace to Prosperity Workshop, Jared Kushner presented the first component of a U.S. peace plan for the Middle East and emphasized the U.S. commitment to the Palestinian people. The stated goal of the Peace to Prosperity plan is “to empower the Palestinian people to build a better future for themselves and their children.” But how does this plan sit with the Palestinian public?
Approval rates for Moon Jae-in are sliding, but his North Korea policy is not one of primary drivers.
In early February 2019, the United States withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty following President Trump’s October 2018 (and the Obama administration’s July 2014) accusations that Russia was failing to comply with the treaty. Russia withdrew from the treaty the next day.
Findings from a February 2019 Chicago Council on Global Affairs general public survey and a December 2018 Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) survey of International Relations (IR) scholars around the world illustrate how these different populations perceive the collapse of the INF Treaty.
The foreign policy elite and the general public have long viewed the potential threat of China very differently. That gap may may now be in decline.
Despite expectations for the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un, their recent summit in Hanoi ended with no agreement toward denuclearization. With that in mind, we asked our panel of foreign policy experts whether the United States should continue to focus primarily on denuclearization, or shift to arms control and non-proliferation.
The Council’s Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy is launching a series of flash polls to share expert insights on policy debates driving today's news.
At a Middle East conference this month in Warsaw, Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and Mideast adviser, said that the administration will unveil its much-vaunted Middle East peace plan after the April 9 Israeli elections.
The Trump administration has taken a hard line on China, but has failed to convince the American public or many allies to follow suit. Instead, publics around the world now see the United States as a major threat.
Recent surveys about the political crisis in Nicaragua
President Trump's demand that South Korea dramtically increase its burden sharing is uniting South Korean across the politica and age spectrum.
Publics in South Korea and Japan agree on the problems that need to be resolved, but there's little optimism they can find solutions.
In recent years, partisanship has become a major factor in foreign policy attitudes in the Chicago Council Surveys; not so long ago opinions on foreign policy seemed immune to partisan impulses. Here are seven striking examples from the 2018 Chicago Council Survey.
It's been a busy, eventful year around the world. Throughout 2018, the Council's polling team has captured public and opinion leader attitudes on some of the most pressing foreign policy issues, including US-Russia relations, American views of China, public support for internationalism and trade, and how the rising generation of Millennials think about American foreign policy.
As the House becomes majority Democrat, there is low confidence among the American public for Congress--and several other institutions--to shape policies that benefit the United States.
President Trump pulled the United States out of the original Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations last year. But a majority of Americans seem to wish he hadn’t done that.