May 4, 2012 | By Roger Thurow

No Food, No Peace

You can’t build peace on empty stomachs.

Norman Borlaug, the father of the Green Revolution, was fond of saying that.  He may not have been the first to formulate that philosophy, but he certainly was one of its most ardent purveyors.  He said it to politicians and economists and journalists and students.  And he said it to generals and their lieutenants as well.

It would be a good slogan for this month of May, packed as it is with crucial international summits.

The clamor is rising for the G8 leaders to accelerate their action to attack hunger and malnutrition and secure the global food chain for future generations when they meet in two weeks at Camp David.  And it should also be directed at the NATO leaders who will be gathering in Chicago later that same weekend.

For the heads of state of the leading industrial nations, increasing agricultural development in poorer countries is of paramount economic importance.  It is vital if the world is to meet one of its greatest challenges: doubling food production by 2050 to meet the demands of a global population that is growing in size and prosperity.  It will contribute to more stable commodity prices.  And it would confront one of our great moral failings: every night, one person in seven goes to bed hungry, and tens of millions of children are in danger of life-long physical and mental stunting because of lack of proper nutrition.

For the NATO brass, ending hunger through agricultural development should be embraced as an important element of their military strategies.  Ensuring food security was a cornerstone of the Marshall Plan to secure the peace in Europe after World War II.  Today, bringing prosperity to farmers is certainly essential for the long-term stability of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Food shortages and rising prices have ignited the two most recent convulsions of regional turmoil: the rioting that hit dozens of countries during the food crisis of 2007-08 and the street uprisings that were a prelude to the Arab Spring last year.

As for promoting global peace, agriculture development is one issue that should bring all countries together – be they friends or enemies.  For every country is impacted by strains on the global food chain; the challenge of doubling food production is not an issue for one country but for all.  It is an equally pressing matter for the U.S. and its NATO allies as it is for China and the countries of the Middle East.  When it comes to food security, the tensions of other issues should ease, inequalities should be erased.  On this front, the developed world needs the developing world; long neglected, the smallholder farmers of Africa are now indispensable to securing the food chain.

President Obama’s Feed the Future Initiative and other programs of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) are central to the administration’s National Security Strategy.  Feed the Future, which seeks to increase investment in agriculture development and create the conditions for poor smallholder farmers to be as productive and prosperous as possible, is a key weapon in the deployment of American “soft power.”

I have said here before that a legion of well-equipped farmers can be mightier than a battalion of tanks.  Even those who command those tanks tend to agree.  Here are several statements from members of the U.S. defense establishment over the past two years, compiled by the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition.
  • “In many respects, USAID’s efforts can do as much – over the long term – to prevent conflict as the deterrent effect of a carrier strike group or a marine expeditionary force. … While the hard power of the military can create trade, space, time, and a viable security environment, the soft power of USAID and the development community can deliver strategic effects and outcomes for decades, affecting generations.” – Lieutenant General John Allen, commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, May 2011.
  • “Economic development is a lot cheaper than sending soldiers.” “Development produces stability and contributes to better governance.” – former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, September 2010.
  • “National security is not just dependent on military power.  It’s dependent on diplomatic power.  It’s dependent on the State Department being able to provide foreign aid, being able to work with countries, being able to provide development money, being able to provide education money.” – Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, December 2011.
  • “Development and diplomacy keep us safer by addressing threats in the most dangerous corners of the world and by preventing conflicts before they occur.” – 70 top military leaders in USGLC National Security Advisory Council’s letter to Congress, March 2011.
 
Hopefully, we will hear more – and see more action — on the food security front from the NATO meeting in two-weeks.  NATO could supply firepower to a renewed G8 food security initiative.  It’s not called food “security” for nothing.

Archive

| By Roger Thurow

A Wondrous Journey

Cruising down I-80 in the summer is one of the most wondrous, and paradoxical, drives in the country.


| By Roger Thurow

1,000 Days and Migrant Stress

The first 1,000 days of a child's life is a critical time for development, where nutrition--and stability--lay the foundation for a lifetime. 



| By Roger Thurow

Outrage and Inspire with Roger Thurow - Am I About to Lose My Second Child, Too?

The latest podcast in our ongoing series with Roger Thurow. Hear how even the best nutrition projects can be undermined by bad water, poor sanitation and hygiene, and lousy infrastructure.  From northern Uganda, we hear a mother’s agony when her healthy, robust child suddenly falls ill after a few sips of water…unclean water, it turned out.











Roger Thurow on SDG 2.2

Roger Thurow sat down with Farming First to talk about the individual and societal consequences of malnutrition. 



Multimedia

Videos


 


Digital Preview of The First 1,000 Days

In his new book, The First 1,000 Days, Council senior fellow Roger Thurow illuminates the 1,000 Days initiative to end early childhood malnutrition through the compelling stories of new mothers in Uganda, India, Guatemala, and Chicago. Get a first-look at photos and stories from the book in this new web interactive.

» Learn more.
» Order your copy of the book.

Books

The First 1,000 Days

Roger Thurow’s book will tell the story of the vital importance of proper nutrition and health care in the 1,000 days window from the beginning of a woman’s pregnancy to her child’s second birthday.

The 1,000 days period is the crucial period of development, when malnutrition can have severe life-long impacts on the individual, the family and society as a whole. Nutritional deficiencies that occur during this time are often overlooked, resulting in a hidden hunger. It is a problem of great human and economic dimensions, impacting rich and poor countries alike.

Learn more »

The Last Hunger Season

In The Last Hunger Season, the intimate dramas of the farmers' lives unfold amidst growing awareness that to feed the world's growing population, food production must double by 2050. How will the farmers, Africa, and a hungrier world deal with issues of water usage, land ownership, foreign investment, corruption, GMO's, the changing role of women, and the politics of foreign aid?

Learn more »

EnoughEnough

Roger Thurow and Scott Kilman, award-winning writers on Africa, development, and agriculture, see famine as the result of bad policies spanning the political spectrum. In this compelling investigative narrative, they explain through vivid human stories how the agricultural revolutions that transformed Asia and Latin America stopped short in Africa, and how our sometimes well-intentioned strategies—alternating with ignorance and neglect—have conspired to keep the world’s poorest people hungry and unable to feed themselves.

Learn more »