October 1, 2010 | By Roger Thurow

African Voices

Listen to these African voices:

“As our governments take action, we need the international community to do its part as well. A green revolution in Africa depends on locally driven solutions plus reliable donor support.  Neither ingredient is sufficient on its own – both are indispensable.”

These are the words of two African agriculture ministers – Agnes Kalibata of Rwanda and Joseph Sam Sesay of Sierra Leone – written in The Guardian this week.  Their countries are at the forefront of African-led efforts to engineer an agriculture transformation on the continent.  Since 2007, Rwanda has increased its investment in agriculture by 30% and Sierra Leone has boosted spending on agriculture to nearly 10% of its budget from just 1.6%.  Accordingly, food production has dramatically increased and malnutrition is in retreat.

And yet they know that they can’t finance all their agriculture needs themselves.  They need the support of the international community.

Their plea for “reliable donor support” is a repudiation to all those who believe that Africa would be better off without foreign aid.  Aid to agriculture isn’t dead aid, it is living aid.  As international aid for the development of African agriculture has severely diminished over the past three decades, the continent’s agriculture hasn’t thrived, as the less-aid-is-better argument would conclude.  Instead, African agriculture productivity has severely slumped along with the aid.

The development of agriculture in every country in the world has required government assistance.  Rich countries like the U.S. and those of Europe could provide their own aid to their farmers – and continue to do so in massive amounts.  But most African countries, so poor and so far behind in agriculture, don’t have the resources to do it on their own.  So they are reaching out – not for food aid to feed their people but for agriculture development aid so their people can feed themselves.The ministers go on to say:

“We know the solutions to our systemic challenges: our farmers need improved inputs, including seeds as well as improved soils; they need roads that will connect them to markets; they need agribusiness credit and private sector investments to spur growth; they need facilities to reduce their estimated 40-60% post-harvest losses and they need training and technology to cope with climate change.  Most of all, they are yearning for results.  If we can boost agricultural productivity, we can accelerate economic growth and raise incomes for communities, countries and our continent as a whole.”

These words are a repudiation to those who say that Africa’s agriculture development efforts are being steered by outside forces intent on imposing American products on unwitting Africans.  Ministers Kalibata and Sesay know as well as anyone what is needed to boost food production in their countries.  These aren’t solutions being imposed from the outside.  They are common sense solutions that every agriculture system in the world needs to be successful.  Africa shouldn’t be expected to settle for less.  And it is aid to support projects desired and designed by the African governments themselves, rather than aid that funds donor-driven projects.

The aid they seek isn’t aid that will just be scattered around their countries wily-nily, like farmers indiscriminately scattering seed on the soil.  It is aid that will be targeted to specific agriculture projects, like farmers taking care to plant their seeds in a disciplined manner that will give them the greatest chance of yielding strong crops.  This isn’t foolish aid, it is wise aid.

The ministers’ concern is that the rhetorical pledges of rich world countries to aid Africa’s agriculture development aren’t translating into monetary commitments.  The Global Agriculture and Food Security Program, a new multi-donor fund to help the world’s poorest farmers, was launched in April with an initial commitment totaling $880 million.  In June, the Fund made its first allocations, dispersing a total of more than $200 million to five of the eight countries that had submitted proposals for agriculture development projects.

Rwanda and Sierra Leone were among the five countries receiving grants.  Rwanda is using the money to support its efforts to terrace hillside farms and create a better watershed system that will hold soil and seeds in place during the heavy rains.  In Sierra Leone, the money is adding to the government’s investments in post-harvest storage and marketing infrastructure that will help smallholder farmers move from subsistence to commercial farming.

But since those initial grants, the flow of money into the Fund has slowed.  Some two dozen countries, most of them in Africa, are expected to apply for funding during the next allocation in coming weeks.  But Fund managers say there may only be enough to finance projects in three countries.  The agriculture ambitions in the countries turned away will be slowed.

Listen to the voices of Africa. “Let our collective action be sustained,” they are saying, “until we end food insecurity.”

Archive

| By Roger Thurow

Impatience

Bill Gates calls himself an “impatient optimist.”

Would that we all shared his optimism and, especially, his impatience.

| By Roger Thurow

Marching Forth

They are marching again in Alabama with no less passion than the civil rights campaigners of the 1960s.

| By Roger Thurow

Going Together

In the new initiative to end hunger through agriculture development, an old African proverb is lighting the way: If you want to go fast, go it alone.  If you want to go far, go together.

| By Roger Thurow

Beyond the Emergency

Before the calamitous earthquake, Haiti was in the news for another tremor: the global food crisis of 2008.

| By Roger Thurow

Unity of Purpose

Norman Borlaug, the father of the Green Revolution, stands as a monument to how one determined individual can make a huge difference in the fight against hunger.  But he often stressed that it took an army of individuals, with a unity of purpose, to win the war.

| By Roger Thurow

Can't Lead Abroad While Losing at Home

In 2003, while reporting in the famine fields of Africa, I met an American aid worker who suggested I expand my research on global hunger: “You should look into hunger in America, too,” she suggested.

| By Roger Thurow

A Hunger Czar Talks… and Talks

His travels may take him to Ethiopia, Malawi, Lesotho or to the far corners of Ireland.  His meetings may be with heads of state, parliamentarians, budgetary bean counters or with farmers and school children.  His missions may range from promoting new conservation tilling techniques to considering the role of breast pumps in improving infant nutrition in Africa.

| By Roger Thurow

From Words to Action: A Rwandan Beginning

They were listening in the hills of Rwanda a year ago when a new American president, this one with African lineage, took the oath of office.  Minutes into his inaugural address, Barack Obama stirred their hopes:

“To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow, to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds.”

| By Roger Thurow

Why Not Hunger?

Given the carnage of the first decade of the 21st Century, the humanitarian front would seem an unlikely source for a beacon of light.  But here it is, shining through the gloom:

Where grassroots clamor is raised, wonders follow.

1,000 Days Project

The 1,000 days period is the crucial period of development, when malnutrition can have severe life-long impacts on the individual, the family and society as a whole. Nutritional deficiencies that occur during this time are often overlooked, resulting in a hidden hunger. It is a problem of great human and economic dimensions, impacting rich and poor countries alike.


The Last Hunger Season

In The Last Hunger Season, the intimate dramas of the farmers’ lives unfold amidst growing awareness that to feed the world’s growing population, food production must double by 2050. How will the farmers, Africa, and a hungrier world deal with issues of water usage, land ownership, foreign investment, corruption, GMO’s, the changing role of women, and the politics of foreign aid?


Enough

Roger Thurow and Scott Kilman, award-winning writers on Africa, development, and agriculture, see famine as the result of bad policies spanning the political spectrum. In this compelling investigative narrative, they explain through vivid human stories how the agricultural revolutions that transformed Asia and Latin America stopped short in Africa, and how our sometimes well-intentioned strategies—alternating with ignorance and neglect—have conspired to keep the world’s poorest people hungry and unable to feed themselves.


Multimedia

Videos


 


Digital Preview of The First 1,000 Days

In his new book, The First 1,000 Days, Council senior fellow Roger Thurow illuminates the 1,000 Days initiative to end early childhood malnutrition through the compelling stories of new mothers in Uganda, India, Guatemala, and Chicago. Get a first-look at photos and stories from the book in this new web interactive.

» Learn more.
» Order your copy of the book.

Books

The First 1,000 Days

Roger Thurow’s book will tell the story of the vital importance of proper nutrition and health care in the 1,000 days window from the beginning of a woman’s pregnancy to her child’s second birthday.

The 1,000 days period is the crucial period of development, when malnutrition can have severe life-long impacts on the individual, the family and society as a whole. Nutritional deficiencies that occur during this time are often overlooked, resulting in a hidden hunger. It is a problem of great human and economic dimensions, impacting rich and poor countries alike.

Learn more »

The Last Hunger Season

In The Last Hunger Season, the intimate dramas of the farmers' lives unfold amidst growing awareness that to feed the world's growing population, food production must double by 2050. How will the farmers, Africa, and a hungrier world deal with issues of water usage, land ownership, foreign investment, corruption, GMO's, the changing role of women, and the politics of foreign aid?

Learn more »

EnoughEnough

Roger Thurow and Scott Kilman, award-winning writers on Africa, development, and agriculture, see famine as the result of bad policies spanning the political spectrum. In this compelling investigative narrative, they explain through vivid human stories how the agricultural revolutions that transformed Asia and Latin America stopped short in Africa, and how our sometimes well-intentioned strategies—alternating with ignorance and neglect—have conspired to keep the world’s poorest people hungry and unable to feed themselves.

Learn more »