“As our governments take action, we need the international community to do its part as well. A green revolution in Africa depends on locally driven solutions plus reliable donor support. Neither ingredient is sufficient on its own – both are indispensable.”
These are the words of two African agriculture ministers – Agnes Kalibata of Rwanda and Joseph Sam Sesay of Sierra Leone – written in The Guardian this week. Their countries are at the forefront of African-led efforts to engineer an agriculture transformation on the continent. Since 2007, Rwanda has increased its investment in agriculture by 30% and Sierra Leone has boosted spending on agriculture to nearly 10% of its budget from just 1.6%. Accordingly, food production has dramatically increased and malnutrition is in retreat.
And yet they know that they can’t finance all their agriculture needs themselves. They need the support of the international community.
Their plea for “reliable donor support” is a repudiation to all those who believe that Africa would be better off without foreign aid. Aid to agriculture isn’t dead aid, it is living aid. As international aid for the development of African agriculture has severely diminished over the past three decades, the continent’s agriculture hasn’t thrived, as the less-aid-is-better argument would conclude. Instead, African agriculture productivity has severely slumped along with the aid.
The development of agriculture in every country in the world has required government assistance. Rich countries like the U.S. and those of Europe could provide their own aid to their farmers – and continue to do so in massive amounts. But most African countries, so poor and so far behind in agriculture, don’t have the resources to do it on their own. So they are reaching out – not for food aid to feed their people but for agriculture development aid so their people can feed themselves.The ministers go on to say:
“We know the solutions to our systemic challenges: our farmers need improved inputs, including seeds as well as improved soils; they need roads that will connect them to markets; they need agribusiness credit and private sector investments to spur growth; they need facilities to reduce their estimated 40-60% post-harvest losses and they need training and technology to cope with climate change. Most of all, they are yearning for results. If we can boost agricultural productivity, we can accelerate economic growth and raise incomes for communities, countries and our continent as a whole.”
These words are a repudiation to those who say that Africa’s agriculture development efforts are being steered by outside forces intent on imposing American products on unwitting Africans. Ministers Kalibata and Sesay know as well as anyone what is needed to boost food production in their countries. These aren’t solutions being imposed from the outside. They are common sense solutions that every agriculture system in the world needs to be successful. Africa shouldn’t be expected to settle for less. And it is aid to support projects desired and designed by the African governments themselves, rather than aid that funds donor-driven projects.
The aid they seek isn’t aid that will just be scattered around their countries wily-nily, like farmers indiscriminately scattering seed on the soil. It is aid that will be targeted to specific agriculture projects, like farmers taking care to plant their seeds in a disciplined manner that will give them the greatest chance of yielding strong crops. This isn’t foolish aid, it is wise aid.
The ministers’ concern is that the rhetorical pledges of rich world countries to aid Africa’s agriculture development aren’t translating into monetary commitments. The Global Agriculture and Food Security Program, a new multi-donor fund to help the world’s poorest farmers, was launched in April with an initial commitment totaling $880 million. In June, the Fund made its first allocations, dispersing a total of more than $200 million to five of the eight countries that had submitted proposals for agriculture development projects.
Rwanda and Sierra Leone were among the five countries receiving grants. Rwanda is using the money to support its efforts to terrace hillside farms and create a better watershed system that will hold soil and seeds in place during the heavy rains. In Sierra Leone, the money is adding to the government’s investments in post-harvest storage and marketing infrastructure that will help smallholder farmers move from subsistence to commercial farming.
But since those initial grants, the flow of money into the Fund has slowed. Some two dozen countries, most of them in Africa, are expected to apply for funding during the next allocation in coming weeks. But Fund managers say there may only be enough to finance projects in three countries. The agriculture ambitions in the countries turned away will be slowed.
Listen to the voices of Africa. “Let our collective action be sustained,” they are saying, “until we end food insecurity.”
The latest edition of our Food Security podcast features Roger Thurow and Jenni Duggan.
The latest edition of out Food Security podcast features Roger Thurow and journalist Karim Chrobog.
Introducing our new podcast on nutrition, hunger, and food security around the world
The 1,000 days are front and center at the Borlaug Dialogues.
Check out a webinar with Roger Thurow on bringing life to the statistics on early child development, via the International Journalists' Network.
Check out an excerpt from Roger Thurow’s book The First 1,000 Days that was syndicated for The Fatherly Forum, a community of parents and influencers with insights about work, family, and life.
According to Roger Thurow, we've neglected nutrition in utero and infancy, with devastating consequences: via Nicholas Kristof's On the Ground blog.
Guest Commentary – “A Stunted Child Anywhere Is a Stunted Child Everywhere:” An Interview with ‘1,000 Days’ Author Roger Thurow
Roger Thurow sat down with Samantha Urban of the ONE Campaign to discuss his new book, The First 1,000 Days.
Get an exclusive excerpt of Roger Thurow's The First 1,000 Days, available from the ONE Campaign.
Roger Thurow sat down with Nathanael Johnson of Grist to discuss the linkage between good nutrition, societal growth, and environmental preservation, as well as his new book, The First 1,000 Days.
Get a first-look at photos and stories from the book in this web interactive.
Digital Preview of The First 1,000 Days
In his new book, The First 1,000 Days, Council senior fellow Roger Thurow illuminates the 1,000 Days initiative to end early childhood malnutrition through the compelling stories of new mothers in Uganda, India, Guatemala, and Chicago. Get a first-look at photos and stories from the book in this new web interactive.
Roger Thurow’s book will tell the story of the vital importance of proper nutrition and health care in the 1,000 days window from the beginning of a woman’s pregnancy to her child’s second birthday.
The 1,000 days period is the crucial period of development, when malnutrition can have severe life-long impacts on the individual, the family and society as a whole. Nutritional deficiencies that occur during this time are often overlooked, resulting in a hidden hunger. It is a problem of great human and economic dimensions, impacting rich and poor countries alike.
In The Last Hunger Season, the intimate dramas of the farmers' lives unfold amidst growing awareness that to feed the world's growing population, food production must double by 2050. How will the farmers, Africa, and a hungrier world deal with issues of water usage, land ownership, foreign investment, corruption, GMO's, the changing role of women, and the politics of foreign aid?
Roger Thurow and Scott Kilman, award-winning writers on Africa, development, and agriculture, see famine as the result of bad policies spanning the political spectrum. In this compelling investigative narrative, they explain through vivid human stories how the agricultural revolutions that transformed Asia and Latin America stopped short in Africa, and how our sometimes well-intentioned strategies—alternating with ignorance and neglect—have conspired to keep the world’s poorest people hungry and unable to feed themselves.