April 17, 2017 | By Cécile Shea

Unilateral Action in North Korea

Cecile Shea explains the consequences of unilateral American military action in North Korea.

 

"There are a number of risks involved in the U.S. taking unilateral action in North Korea There is the possibility that the North Koreans would rain artillery shells down on Seoul. They could destroy Seoul in a couple of hours without using any nuclear weapons, just conventional weapons. There's a risk to Japan in terms of sabotage, in terms of submarine attacks, in terms of sleeper agents, in the country committing horrific attacks. But really the most sensitive area is China. If China believes there are U.S. forces moving into North Korea, that the U.S. is planning to somehow invade North Korea, they will get very, very nervous. Because they absolutely, positively, cannot abide the U.S. military being in North Korea when North Korea has a very long border with China. So that is by far the most sensitive issue for the United States. It is that ensuring that if we do, if President Trump does decide to take some action against the North, that the Chinese are not going to react very very badly and perhaps increase tensions in the region."

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. We convene leading global voices and conduct independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in blog posts are the sole responsibility of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council.

Archive









Urban Reflections from the 2019 International Student Delegation

Each year approximately 30 students from leading research universities around the world participate in the global student delegation program at the Pritzker Forum on Global Cities. Promising students who have demonstrated a commitment to improving global cities and are enrolled in a master’s or PhD program are nominated by their host universities to attend. The 2019 delegation included 30 students from 20 countries, including China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Germany, Israel, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Their biographies are available here.

The following series of contributions are their reflections and insights inspired by and drawn from their experience attending the 2019 Pritzker Forum.


| By Lille van der Zanden

Social Equity: The Legacy of 100 Resilient Cities

On July 31, 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) officially ceased its operations, marking a turning point in the modern urban resiliency movement to create cities that can bounce back from disaster. In six years, the Rockefeller Foundation-funded initiative brought a standardized urban resilience framework to cities across the globe, facilitating the development of more than 80 resilience plans in the process. As a result of its work, urban resiliency planning has become a common practice for city governments, with many institutionalizing the position of a chief resiliency officer.




| By Ian Klaus

Will Ambassador Subnat Go to Washington?

On June 28, 2019, Congressmen Ted W. Lieu (D-CA33) and Joe Wilson (R-SC02) introduced H.R.3571, the “City and State Diplomacy Act.” The Act seeks to mandate a senior official at the State Department charged with “supervision (including policy oversight of resources) of Federal support for subnational engagements by State and municipal governments with foreign governments.” The position would be at the ambassadorial level, and “Ambassador Subnat” would require the consent of the Senate and oversee a new Office of Subnational Diplomacy.