October 24, 2016

Public Opinion and Foreign Policy in an Unusual Election Year

Core supporters of Donald Trump are most opposed to immigrants and least likely to support free trade, but Americans overall favor continued immigration and support globalization, according to the 2016 Chicago Council Survey. Council senior fellow Dina Smeltz breaks down the report findings in the video below.
 

 

"This is a really unusual election year. For the first time in decades, a major presidential contender is challenging traditional US foreign policy that's been in place for more than 70 years. The 2016 Chicago Council Survey on American public opinion questioned more than 2,000 Americans.

Results show that anxieties about immigration and trade are key to Donald Trump's political success. Sixteen percent of respondents selected Donald Trump as their top choice for president among a list of primary candidates. Among these core Trump supporters, 80 percent see immigration as a critical threat compared to 27 percent of Democrats, 40 percent of Independents, and 67 percent of Republicans. And just 49 percent see globalization as mostly good for the United States, compared to 74 percent of Democrats, 61 percent of Independents, and 59 percent of Republicans.

But these concerns are not new. Since 1998 a majority of Republicans have said that immigration is a threat to the United States. And since 2008 Republicans have expressed more negative views on globalization and trade. Overall these views represent only a minority among the American public. Forty-three percent of Americans see immigration as a threat. And 65 percent of Americans say that globalization is mostly good.

But concerns about immigration and trade have grown more prominent in this election. And whoever becomes the next president will have to address these concerns."

See key findings from the 2016 Chicago Council Survey in this digital interactive.

 

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. We convene leading global voices and conduct independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in blog posts are the sole responsibility of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council.

Archive


| By Karin Larson

A Future for the European Union After the Pandemic?

With borders now closed and countries like Italy in an increasingly restrictive nation-wide lockdown under the threat of the novel coronavirus, Europe is facing a crisis likely unparalleled since the end of World War II. This compounds an already disruptive year, following the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union, and increasingly calls into question the continued relevance of the political and economic bloc.



| By Richard C. Longworth

Midwestern Voters Aren't Ready for Revolution

The Midwest is caught in the painful shift from one economy to another, and its divided fortunes show this. It is a split between winners and losers, between well-educated city dwellers and the left behind, angry denizens of the old economy. All this has big impacts that are economic and social – and political. 





| By Xuefei Ren

‘The People’s War’ on Coronavirus in China

It is too early to conclude that the epidemic will shake the Communist Party’s grip. Once the “people’s war” has defeated the epidemic, the authoritarian regime may turn out to have become even more powerful. But this crisis has made a few things clear. It illustrates how cities are increasingly important actors in addressing pressing global challenges. It also exemplifies how central-local government relations can shape a country’s response to major epidemic outbreaks.