August 16, 2017 | By

Phil Levy Explains the NAFTA Renegotiations

Former Council Senior Fellow on the Global Economy Phil Levy explains what NAFTA is, what the goals of the renegotiation might be, and how the renegotiation process is likely to play out.

"NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement. It was a deal that was signed between the US, Canada, and Mexico in the early 90s. The original NAFTA was negotiated by George Herbert Walker Bush and his administration. They didn't get it signed. It was inherited by Bill Clinton, who made some modifications to this--labor and environmental side letters--and then he shepherded it through Congress. So what are the goals of the NAFTA renegotiation? That remains to be seen. So you have some people who say the goals are that we eliminate trade deficits. Others who say we modernize the agreement. And those two groups are not necessarily pointing in the same direction. I think there's really two versions of what we might have: One is the extended play version and one is the really short play version. The extended play version is something like what we saw with TPP, where it was always an exciting project for tomorrow and the negotiations stretched across pretty much the entire Obama presidency. The short play version would probably mean that they did something fairly similar to the TPP and tried to get it settled really by the end of this year if they could because you've got Mexican elections coming up next year and they don't want to get to this entangled with Mexican elections. The problem with that short play version is even if you have an agreement you still have to work it through the US Congress, and that puts you on a timetable where you're having congressional discussions of NAFTA 2.0 right in the middle of midterm elections. I think the best-case scenario is that they come up with a modernization package that doesn't look wildly different from what was contained in the TPP and they get enough congressional approval that it can be whisked through relatively quickly. I think that's a long shot."


The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. We convene leading global voices and conduct independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in blog posts are the sole responsibility of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council.


| By Dasl Yoon

Deep Dish Special Edition: COVID-19 Lessons from South Korea

The Wall Street Journal’s Dasl Yoon, reporting from Seoul, joins us to explain what other countries can learn from South Korea’s innovative approaches to successfully flatten the curve of new infections – without shutting down the economy.

| By Karin Larson

A Future for the European Union After the Pandemic?

With borders now closed and countries like Italy in an increasingly restrictive nation-wide lockdown under the threat of the novel coronavirus, Europe is facing a crisis likely unparalleled since the end of World War II. This compounds an already disruptive year, following the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union, and increasingly calls into question the continued relevance of the political and economic bloc.

| By Richard C. Longworth

Midwestern Voters Aren't Ready for Revolution

The Midwest is caught in the painful shift from one economy to another, and its divided fortunes show this. It is a split between winners and losers, between well-educated city dwellers and the left behind, angry denizens of the old economy. All this has big impacts that are economic and social – and political. 

| By Xuefei Ren

‘The People’s War’ on Coronavirus in China

It is too early to conclude that the epidemic will shake the Communist Party’s grip. Once the “people’s war” has defeated the epidemic, the authoritarian regime may turn out to have become even more powerful. But this crisis has made a few things clear. It illustrates how cities are increasingly important actors in addressing pressing global challenges. It also exemplifies how central-local government relations can shape a country’s response to major epidemic outbreaks.