Barack Obama smiles as he attends a town hall meeting with members of the Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative at the GEM Center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam May 25, 2016. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
America’s economic and strategic future rests in Asia. Home to half the world’s population and the three largest economies in the world, the Asia-Pacific region is ground zero for growth in the global economy. President Obama understands this well, and is visiting Asia this week to strengthen the bonds between America and its Asian allies.
And yet, America’s ambitious strategy to reassert itself as a Pacific power—its so-called “rebalance” to Asia—is hardly completed. As David Sanger reports in the New York Times, seven years into the rebalance, “Asian nations are deeply skeptical about how much they can rely on Washington’s commitment and staying power in the region.”
First, conclusion of the Trans-Pacific Partnership was delayed. Recall, the Trans-Pacific Partnership was to be a central pillar of the Obama administration’s pivot to Asia. The deal was originally supposed to be concluded in 2012; however, negotiations stretched all the way into late 2015. Consequently, the TPP’s prospects are thinning under the corrosive politics of the 2016 election. To be clear, a failure to pass the TPP would have serious strategic consequences for America’s role in Asia.
Another hurdle to the rebalance has been that America’s foreign policy energies have been focused elsewhere. In the period that the Obama administration hoped to shift its attention to Asia, the United States was forced to continually respond to economic and security crises in the Middle East and Europe.
The result is that America's rebalance to Asia is in trouble. For the United States, this could mean a significant economic and strategic opportunity lost. For Asia, an absent America could spell more political, economic, and military instability in the region.
This week's selected reads examine the challenges inherent in American leadership in the Pacific, and highlights some of the pitfalls that may further derail US efforts to rebalance to Asia.
The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. We convene leading global voices and conduct independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.
The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in blog posts are the sole responsibility of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council.
The Council on Foreign Relations’ Mira Rapp-Hooper joins Deep Dish to explain why the alliance system is still essential for America’s global leadership – but must be remade to meet the challenges of the 21st century.
Can an administration that up to this point has been belligerent towards traditional US democratic allies and has rejected many forms of multilateralism be able to turn the page and shift from "America First" to "American Led"?
The Council's Ian Klaus examines the importance of civil society in the urban response to COVID-19.
The Council on Foreign Relations’ Adam Segal joins Deep Dish to explain the battles between China and the US over products like Huawei and TikTok, their role in US foreign policy, and why US allies are choosing sides.
This week on Deep Dish, the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Judd Devermont and the Financial Times’ Neil Munshi explain why Mali’s instability is a threat to Africa’s Sahel region — soon to be the West’s largest conflict zone.
Former Netanyahu foreign policy advisor Jonathan Schachter and Brookings’ Tamara Cofman Wittes join Deep Dish to examine how Israel’s foreign policy has changed and the way the country’s relationships will shape the future.
The Council's Sam Kling explains why the rising number of COVID-19 cases nationwide provides an opportunity to re-examine assumptions about the virus’s relationship to city life.
Lawyer and author Alina Das joins Deep Dish to share the stories that give a face to decades of legislation criminalizing immigrants — and what we can do to begin to fix the system.
The Council's Sam Kling examines the mayoral response to George Floyd's killing — and the implications on the role cities play in national and global politics.
Investigative reporter Catherine Belton joins Deep Dish to examine the people that surround Russia’s enigmatic leader – and the financial ties to the West that makes the Kremlin’s dominance possible.
The Igarapé Institute’s Ilona Szabó and the Financial Times' Andres Schipani join Deep Dish to examine the implications of social, political, and economic turmoil in South America’s largest economy.
University of Wisconsin-Madison historian Brenda Gayle Plummer joins Deep Dish to examine what the United States must learn from systemic racism's influence on our past in order to fix our foreign policy.
Facing a lack of support and a disconnect between national migration policies and local integration strategies, a small but growing number of cities are increasingly engaging in diplomacy to reshape migration narratives at the global level.
In the coming months, local communication will merit special attention as a key tool to combat discrimination and turn the COVID-19 challenge into an opportunity for moving societies towards inclusion and social cohesion, rather than xenophobia.
Jamil Anderlini, the Financial Times’ Asia editor, and Kurt Tong, former US Consul General in Hong Kong, join Deep Dish to examine how Hong Kong might impact the US-China rivalry.