August 4, 2016

How Has the Iran Nuclear Deal Changed the US-Iran Relationship?

One year after the signing of the Iran nuclear deal, the future of the US-Iran relationship remains unclear. Weighing in on whether the deal has led to a lasting shift are career ambassadors Thomas Pickering and James F. Jeffrey who spoke at the Council's June 27 event, "The Iran Deal: A Reassessment."

 

James F. Jeffrey, former US Ambassador to Albania, Iraq, and Turkey

It's changed it in several ways. First of all, there is a better level of communication between the two. Even though I'm, by profession, a retired diplomat, I don't see that as a be all and end all of international relations or foreign policy. But it is in and of itself a good thing. Secondly, Iran as a country—I'm quoting Henry Kissinger here, Iran has to decide whether it's a cause or a country....As a country, an argument to participate, at least partially, in the international system, that doesn't end all of our—necessarily end—all of our problems with Iran. China and Russia are major participants in the international system and we have even greater status quo problems with them. But it can move it a little bit in that direction.
 

Thomas Pickering, former US Ambassador to Israel, Russia, and the United Nations

We've probably had more communication with Iran in the last two years than we have had in the last 100 years. But certainly in the period since the Iranian revolution in '78 and '79, when we had almost no communication. And while communication, in itself, is not the answer to all the problems, the absence of communication makes problem-solving a lot more difficult.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. We convene leading global voices and conduct independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in blog posts are the sole responsibility of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council.

Archive








Urban Reflections from the 2019 International Student Delegation

Each year approximately 30 students from leading research universities around the world participate in the global student delegation program at the Pritzker Forum on Global Cities. Promising students who have demonstrated a commitment to improving global cities and are enrolled in a master’s or PhD program are nominated by their host universities to attend. The 2019 delegation included 30 students from 20 countries, including China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Germany, Israel, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Their biographies are available here.

The following series of contributions are their reflections and insights inspired by and drawn from their experience attending the 2019 Pritzker Forum.


| By Lille van der Zanden

Social Equity: The Legacy of 100 Resilient Cities

On July 31, 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) officially ceased its operations, marking a turning point in the modern urban resiliency movement to create cities that can bounce back from disaster. In six years, the Rockefeller Foundation-funded initiative brought a standardized urban resilience framework to cities across the globe, facilitating the development of more than 80 resilience plans in the process. As a result of its work, urban resiliency planning has become a common practice for city governments, with many institutionalizing the position of a chief resiliency officer.




| By Ian Klaus

Will Ambassador Subnat Go to Washington?

On June 28, 2019, Congressmen Ted W. Lieu (D-CA33) and Joe Wilson (R-SC02) introduced H.R.3571, the “City and State Diplomacy Act.” The Act seeks to mandate a senior official at the State Department charged with “supervision (including policy oversight of resources) of Federal support for subnational engagements by State and municipal governments with foreign governments.” The position would be at the ambassadorial level, and “Ambassador Subnat” would require the consent of the Senate and oversee a new Office of Subnational Diplomacy.