April 27, 2020 | By Iain Whitaker

How the Council is Responding to the Shutdown


The final years of the Council’s first century may prove to be its most momentous. On March 12, our offices and conference center closed, and all in-person events were cancelled, for an indefinite period. For an organization devoted to advancing the connections between Chicago and the world, the arrival of pandemic coronavirus has been as jarring as it is surreal. It is difficult to escape the impression that we are living through the sort of world-shaping events, and the direst of expert warnings, delivered from our stage.

Council distinguished fellow Richard Longworth, who is working on a history of the Council, confirmed that the Council’s offices have never shut down like this before (even snowpocalypse ’11 and polar vortex ’19 only stopped us for a couple of days—and technically the office was open for more adventurous staff). Think about that for a moment: throughout the Great Depression, Pearl Harbor, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and 9/11, the office lights stayed on.

Programming continued too. During the chaotic 1968 Democratic National Convention, for example, devoted members dodged protestors and police to reach an event at the Congress Hotel, Longworth said. There were often robust debates within the organization’s leadership and staff about where the organization should stand on the big issues, but events were never halted. In fact, crises have tended to see a ramping-up of content, driven by our mission to provide concerned members with timely discussions on the world at critical moments.

In that sense at least, this moment is a comforting continuation. While our conference center is currently devoid of life, within two weeks of the office closing we were producing as much programming as we had been before the coronavirus struck. Thankfully we have at our disposal a tool that our predecessors could have only dreamed of: Zoom. As of April 28, 22 programs have been live streamed, including 15 devoted to varying dimensions of the coronavirus crisis, with many more in the works. The Council’s Deep Dish podcast is another marvelous modern innovation that has enabled us to produce content entirely uninterrupted by the office closure. And all of this has been delivered from makeshift offices in Streeterville, Lakeview, Mundeleine, and Western Springs, while toddlers and terriers compete for attention.

This “virtual” world presents boundless opportunities (billions of potential viewers, if we’re feeling ambitious) and access to speakers who no longer have to travel any further than their home office, kitchen table, or—in at least one case—their porch. But there’s also a lot more competition for fickle eyeballs in the rootless ether of the world wide web, and it’s trickier to generate revenue. Then there are the well-publicized peculiarities of Zoom: for our early events, the fact we were never “Zoom bombed” was probably more by luck than design.

As the world is quickly learning, coronavirus is an epic stress test of an organization’s every function. For the Council it has meant creating the infrastructure and policies to support an entirely remote workforce, all in a matter of days. It has meant building a new programming infrastructure, cancelling months of in-person programs, and converting some to digital events. It has meant modifying our communications strategy to penetrate a news cycle dominated by the virus. Across the Council’s three research centers—the Pritzker Forum on Global Cities, the Global Food and Agriculture Program, and the Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy—it has meant contemplating what a world turned upside-down by COVID-19 means for long-term research projects. And it is pushing us to find creative new ways to maintain an all-important sense of community between staff, members, donors, young professionals, and emerging leaders, in an age of prolonged social distancing.

None of these are things we thought we would be doing two months ago. Adjusting to this new reality has taken a big heap of ingenuity and hard work, alongside a growing tolerance for uncertainty. Just as necessity is the mother of invention, so crises prompt the sorts of bold decisions and silo-busting through which organizations evolve. Although the Council has been producing digital content for some time now, it feels like our capabilities have advanced years in the past six weeks. When the lights finally flicker back on in the McCormick Foundation Hall, it will be exciting to explore how we might merge the physical and digital worlds we now inhabit, to create new opportunities for audience engagement. There’ll no doubt be a lot to talk about then, too.

Until then, stay safe, thank you for your support—and see you on Zoom!

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. We convene leading global voices and conduct independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in blog posts are the sole responsibility of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council.

Archive




| By Laurence Ralph, Thomas Abt, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Police Reform Lessons from Around the World

Princeton University’s Laurence Ralph and the Council on Criminal Justice’s Thomas Abt join Deep Dish to explain why police brutality is not a uniquely American phenomenon and argue the strongest examples of successful police reform come from outside the United States.



| By Pavin Chachavalpongpun, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Thailand’s Youth Demand Democratic Reforms

Political scientist Pavin Chachavalpongpun joins Deep Dish to explain how social media makes these Thailand's pro-democracy protests different than past movements and why the United States should see Thailand as a foreign policy priority when negotiating a rising China.



| By Maha Yahya, Emile Hokayem, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Can Lebanon Overcome Corruption and Crisis?

Carnegie Middle East Center Director Maha Yahya and the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Emile Hokayem join Deep Dish to examine the ongoing protest movement in Lebanon, Hezbollah’s role in the crisis, and how a system built on sectarian politics could be rebuilt.


| By Laura Rosenberger, Jacob Helberg, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Making Cyberspace Safe for Democracy

The Alliance for Security Democracy’s Laura Rosenberger and Stanford University’s Jacob Helberg join Deep Dish to discuss digital interference, misinformation, and data privacy within the lens of geopolitics. 


| By Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Scott Sagan, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Nuclear Threats 75 Years After Hiroshima

Seventy-five years after Hiroshima, former deputy secretary of energy Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall and Stanford University’s Scott Sagan join Deep Dish to examine the threat of nuclear weapons today.


| By Mira Rapp-Hooper, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Why Allies are Key for US Security Today

The Council on Foreign Relations’ Mira Rapp-Hooper joins Deep Dish to explain why the alliance system is still essential for America’s global leadership – but must be remade to meet the challenges of the 21st century. 




| By Adam Segal, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Who’s Winning the US-China Tech War?

The Council on Foreign Relations’ Adam Segal joins Deep Dish to explain the battles between China and the US over products like Huawei and TikTok, their role in US foreign policy, and why US allies are choosing sides. 


| By Judd Devermont, Neil Munshi, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Mali’s Instability Threatens the Sahel

This week on Deep Dish, the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Judd Devermont and the Financial Times’ Neil Munshi explain why Mali’s instability is a threat to Africa’s Sahel region — soon to be the West’s largest conflict zone.