February 27, 2019 | By John Austin

Global Engagement Key Driver of Midwest Prosperity


The Midwest was America’s first frontier, then the foundation of the country’s agricultural and industrial might. It was the birthplace of great industries and a mecca for migrants seeking a better life and new economic opportunity. As the region forged America’s middle class, much of its success resulted from robust global engagement through trade, immigration, and partnerships.

Today, too many voices in the region are turning their back to the world, advancing nativist and isolationist sentiments and policies. For the Midwest to thrive in the global economy, it needs to open its doors to the world, not shut it out. Midwest communities thrive when they support climate action agendas, such as the Paris Agreement, increase global trade, and welcome immigrants.

The Midwest faced a similar wave of isolationism and nativism driven by the First World War and the seismic economic dislocations of the Great Depression in the early twentieth century. But rather than succumb to these trends, the region’s business and labor leaders looked outward and crafted an affirmative and engaged economic and social response to a changing world. It led to a period of unrivaled US economic prosperity that shaped the international order, with an outsized role on the part of the Midwest and its dominant industrial, manufacturing, and agricultural sectors.

However, the Midwest’s industrial might has diminished over the past 40 years. Revolutions in communications, transportation, and technology have shrunk the planet and reshaped the region’s mighty manufacturing base and, in turn, dissipated employment and populations in many Midwestern communities. Many cities and towns across the region are making an uneven transition from this industrial era to the new innovation-based, technology-driven, global knowledge economy.

This uneven adaptation of the Midwest’s communities and economy played out in the 2016 presidential election when uncertainties around a changing world and economic prospects for the future propelled Donald Trump to the presidency. As many Midwesterners’ economic and social anxieties spilled into the political sphere, it gave fuel to a new national round of protectionism and nativism, encouraged by the current administration.

But many Midwest communities have turned an economic corner and are thriving. Those that leveraged their great assets—innovative global companies, leading colleges and universities, historical anchor institutions, quality of place attributes – and opened doors to newcomers have found success in a changed economy.

Economic and social engagement with the world is a key part of these “winning” community strategies. To rebut arguments by those who would disengage from the world and international economy, we need to examine the economic performance and prosperity of Midwest communities relative to three strong proxies for global engagement: Climate action, international trade, and immigration. These include those communities that:

  • Make a purposeful commitment to fight climate change through participation in the Paris Climate Agreement that the Trump administration seeks to abrogate
  • Have attracted a greater share of foreign-born residents through intentional and strategic immigrant welcoming policies
  • Are disproportionately engaged and reliant on global commerce and trade through a higher relative share of exports

By examining the economic strength of Midwest communities in relation to these proxies for global engagement, we can see how global engagement economically benefits the Midwest.

Climate Action

Of the three proxies, there is a direct correlation between relative economic prosperity and the communities committed to tackling climate change. In the nine-state Midwest, from the eastern Great Lakes to Missouri and Iowa, roughly 15 percent of all counties are home to relatively prosperous citizens (“high-income”), where the median county income of residents is above their state’s median income. As seen in Table 1, 63 percent of these high-income counties are home to communities that have pledged to uphold the standards laid out in the Paris Agreement, through the We Are Still In campaign. Moreover, of all the Midwestern counties that are committed to the Paris Agreement, approximately 47 percent are high-income, a much higher rate than all Midwest counties, illustrating that those communities dedicated to global cooperation and standards for climate change reduction strategies also have the most robust local economies.

Table 1: Midwest High-Income Counties and the Paris Agreement


Welcoming Communities

There is also a connection between welcoming immigrants and a community’s economic growth. Thirty-seven percent of Midwest metro population growth has come from immigrants over the past 15 years. When the United States restricted immigration in the 1920s, the decline in total numbers of immigrants correlated with population stagnation and decline throughout the Midwest.

Research has also found that “the presence of immigrants led to increased economic growth.” Low-skilled immigrants play key roles as farm and meat-packing workers in rural counties and help keep the hospitality sector thriving, while in other communities immigrants tend to be engineers, doctors and nurses, and IT specialists. Immigrants start businesses at a higher rate than US-born individuals. And in Michigan, several studies have shown that immigrants to Michigan are better educated than the domestic population.

As Table 2 demonstrates, of the six Michigan counties with a higher share of immigrants (“high-immigrant”) than the state average, four are also among Michigan’s high-income counties. Overall, immigrant populations are made up of greater shares of individuals with a less than a high school diploma than the native-born population, but also a greater share of those with a bachelors or professional degree. Both of these immigrant groups meet critical Midwest labor market needs. Many communities, such as the Welcoming Economies Global Network, a project of Welcoming America and Global Detroit, are exploring how to maximize economic dynamism with immigrant populations.

Table 2: Michigan High-Income/High-Immigrant Counties



There are many communities in the Midwest that are export-dependent, including numerous rural, agricultural counties that rely on foreign markets, as well as more urbanized metros with advanced products and services. While other Midwest communities do not have an industry or product mix that is engaged in global trade, the Midwest overall punches above its weight, accounting for 26 percent of the United States’ export-derived GDP.

On balance, being engaged in global trade appears to help, not hurt Midwestern communities. More than half (51 percent) of the high-income counties in the Midwest export more than their state average; Moreover, although high-income counties account for only 15 percent of the region’s 700-plus counties, they account for almost half (45 percent) of Midwest counties that are above average exporters. Furthermore, the number of Fortune 500 companies headquartered in the Midwest make it vital that the region remain globally engaged on trade.


Given current threats of pullback from the international order, and disentangling from mutually beneficial trade, environmental, and migration regimes, the Midwest must once again develop and make an affirmative, outward-oriented vision for its future. Regional leaders must reject trends towards disengagement with the world, nativism, and protectionism, but also map out a better, brighter path. They need to help guide the region in forging the supportive policies and economically and socially positive global engagements that will ensure success in the world and economy of today and tomorrow.

Jack Farrell of the University of Michigan contributed to this piece.

Data for both tables was sourced from the US Census Bureau.

International trade data by county can be found through the International Trade Administration, US Department of Commerce; Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) export totals are divided equally across each MSA county.


The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. We convene leading global voices and conduct independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in blog posts are the sole responsibility of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council.


| By Laurence Ralph, Thomas Abt, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Police Reform Lessons from Around the World

Princeton University’s Laurence Ralph and the Council on Criminal Justice’s Thomas Abt join Deep Dish to explain why police brutality is not a uniquely American phenomenon and argue the strongest examples of successful police reform come from outside the United States.

| By Pavin Chachavalpongpun, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Thailand’s Youth Demand Democratic Reforms

Political scientist Pavin Chachavalpongpun joins Deep Dish to explain how social media makes these Thailand's pro-democracy protests different than past movements and why the United States should see Thailand as a foreign policy priority when negotiating a rising China.

| By Maha Yahya, Emile Hokayem, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Can Lebanon Overcome Corruption and Crisis?

Carnegie Middle East Center Director Maha Yahya and the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Emile Hokayem join Deep Dish to examine the ongoing protest movement in Lebanon, Hezbollah’s role in the crisis, and how a system built on sectarian politics could be rebuilt.

| By Laura Rosenberger, Jacob Helberg, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Making Cyberspace Safe for Democracy

The Alliance for Security Democracy’s Laura Rosenberger and Stanford University’s Jacob Helberg join Deep Dish to discuss digital interference, misinformation, and data privacy within the lens of geopolitics. 

| By Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Scott Sagan, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Nuclear Threats 75 Years After Hiroshima

Seventy-five years after Hiroshima, former deputy secretary of energy Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall and Stanford University’s Scott Sagan join Deep Dish to examine the threat of nuclear weapons today.

| By Mira Rapp-Hooper, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Why Allies are Key for US Security Today

The Council on Foreign Relations’ Mira Rapp-Hooper joins Deep Dish to explain why the alliance system is still essential for America’s global leadership – but must be remade to meet the challenges of the 21st century. 

| By Adam Segal, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Who’s Winning the US-China Tech War?

The Council on Foreign Relations’ Adam Segal joins Deep Dish to explain the battles between China and the US over products like Huawei and TikTok, their role in US foreign policy, and why US allies are choosing sides. 

| By Judd Devermont, Neil Munshi, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Mali’s Instability Threatens the Sahel

This week on Deep Dish, the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Judd Devermont and the Financial Times’ Neil Munshi explain why Mali’s instability is a threat to Africa’s Sahel region — soon to be the West’s largest conflict zone.