June 29, 2016 | By Kris Hartley

Global Cities: Antidote to Political Isolationism


A woman passes the skyline of the central business district in a public housing estate in Singapore. REUTERS/Edgar Su

The world is entering a new age of anxiety. Globalization and disruptive technologies are changing job markets in both established and emerging economies. Territorial disputes are forcing countries into costly arms races, while terrorism and oppression are generating waves of migration. The specter of global pandemic grows with each new disease outbreak. Given such threats, turning inward is becoming a politically expedient policy platform. Yet overcoming global challenges requires exactly the opposite approach: trust, international cooperation, and information sharing.

Panicky nations are refusing to acknowledge this, but global cities can. With their networks, diversity, and culture of pragmatism, global cities can take on the tedious work of improving opportunities for their citizens. This difficult task will involve defiance, dialogue, and diplomacy. But with any luck, global cities can provide the antidote to growing national isolationism.

Where there is anxiety, political opportunism looms. Demagogues rally their base by attributing threats to external enemies and underrepresented populations. Ethnic minorities are branded job-takers and religious minorities stereotyped as covert infiltrators; they bear unjustifiable blame for a multitude of grievances. Political movements around the world exhibit this trend, with growing right-wing nationalism in Europe, “strongman” politics in Russia and the Philippines, and tightening authoritarianism in Turkey, Malaysia, and China. In the United States, a brash political novice secured the presidential nomination with promises of closed borders and racial profiling, while the recent British vote to exit the European Union reflects nationalist scepticism about the value of cooperative regional governance.

These trends point toward a daunting prospect: the 21st century may see major superpowers ruled by populist autocrats. But cities can chart their own way.

First, cities must show defiance by banding together, using collaboration to push back against re-centralization and attempts by national leaders to consolidate power under the guise of security. To accomplish this, global cities and their domestic peers should collaborate. Political divides between urban and national governments have been long evident in voting patterns, yet many cities now share development objectives, such as growth strategies stressing amenities that attract knowledge workers. As such, increased city networking within nations would generate a political and economic bloc to counterbalance national power, particularly autocratic and isolationist interests.

Second, cities must win the marketplace of development ideas through dialogue, demonstrating how openness and diversity attracts talent to produce solutions for actual threats like disease, poverty, security, environmental degradation, and climate change. Cities, with their world class universities, research laboratories, and cutting-edge companies, are incubators for social and economic progress in a world that now seems content to regress. Selling ideas in favor of openness requires a comprehensive effort involving media, high-visibility events, and scholarly institutions.  

Finally, cities must prepare to survive the economic consequences of isolationism through diplomacy—international urban diplomacy that strengthens economic ties with city and national governments worldwide. Urban leaders can take the lead to foster international connections and directly support their own economic development strategies. While there are some national-level policies that city governments cannot overcome, cities can exert collective influence to counter national regulations regarding openness, connectivity, and diversity that might otherwise impede their ability to act globally.

“Global” is as much an attitude as a status; even small cities have international ambitions and philosophies. However, national governments can weaken a city’s influence regardless of its size or importance to the global economy. To escape this fate and realize their potential, cities must proudly embrace the attributes that made them prosper, turning them into economic and cultural capitals. As agents of openness, moderation, and pragmatism, global cities provide the antidote to growing national isolationism in an otherwise politically volatile era.

Kris Hartley is a PhD Candidate at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, and a Nonresident Fellow for Global Cities at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

About

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. We convene leading global voices and conduct independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in blog posts are the sole responsibility of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council.

Archive



| By Ian Klaus

Did the UNSG Say “Revolution”?

While there is nothing convenient about 2020, the upcoming Pritzker Forum on Global Cities has been helpfully anticipated by a series of publications that speak to the high stakes currently in play in cities around the world and the urgent need - from the perspective of both efficacy and equity - to adapt governance practices.








| By Laurence Ralph, Thomas Abt, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Police Reform Lessons from Around the World

Princeton University’s Laurence Ralph and the Council on Criminal Justice’s Thomas Abt join Deep Dish to explain why police brutality is not a uniquely American phenomenon and argue the strongest examples of successful police reform come from outside the United States.



| By Pavin Chachavalpongpun, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Thailand’s Youth Demand Democratic Reforms

Political scientist Pavin Chachavalpongpun joins Deep Dish to explain how social media makes these Thailand's pro-democracy protests different than past movements and why the United States should see Thailand as a foreign policy priority when negotiating a rising China.


| By Maha Yahya, Emile Hokayem, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Can Lebanon Overcome Corruption and Crisis?

Carnegie Middle East Center Director Maha Yahya and the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Emile Hokayem join Deep Dish to examine the ongoing protest movement in Lebanon, Hezbollah’s role in the crisis, and how a system built on sectarian politics could be rebuilt.



| By Laura Rosenberger, Jacob Helberg, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Making Cyberspace Safe for Democracy

The Alliance for Security Democracy’s Laura Rosenberger and Stanford University’s Jacob Helberg join Deep Dish to discuss digital interference, misinformation, and data privacy within the lens of geopolitics.