November 5, 2018 | By John Austin

Germany Accelerates Change in Its “Rust Belt”

Both the United States and Germany are seeing evolving economies in their respective “rust belts,” formerly robust engines of the industrial era. Both countries are developing strategies to address the challenges the regions are facing. But while President Trump’s approach tries to bring back the past, Germany is focused on accelerating change so the region will thrive in the future.

“Here we are proud of our industrial history; we are the hard workers that drove our nation’s economy forward after World War II.”

I could have been in Flint or Detroit, Michigan. Instead I was hearing from the local manager of a new startup and innovation hub deep in the “Ruhrgebiet” – Germany’s coal and steel region, once home to heavy industry and twin to our nation’s “rust belt.”

As part of a Public Diplomacy Visitors program sponsored by the German government, I joined an international delegation to examine Germany’s approach to structural change. I was struck by two realities: How similar are the economies and cultures of our industrial regions; and how divergent are the countries’ approaches to dealing with similar dynamics of economic dislocation and change.

In parts of former East Germany, and the Ruhr industrial belt in the West—just like here at home in America’s industrial Midwest—there is great cultural pride in being the economic engines of our countries; places where a middle-class life was afforded through manual labor and hard work. These regions are home to communities where workers were treated as heroes, and labor unions were strong.

Today many parallels remain. There certainly is nostalgia in both our Midwest and many German communities for the days of humming mills, mines, factories and bustling communities. They are both ground zero for the current political debate about the role of migrants and immigrants: On the one hand welcoming immigrants for much needed new talent, population, enterprise and community revitalization; on the other hand, places where many residents are responsive to fear-mongering about a more diverse and changing polity and culture.

But the approaches to deal with today’s transformations are dramatically different. While in the United States there is increasing talk and concern about ameliorating our growing regional economic disparities, the Germans are running plans to do something about it, aided by a more politically durable and aggressive commitment to “balance” growth—emanating from their Constitution.

The German Constitution explicitly sets a goal of affording equal living conditions and quality of life for residents—wherever they are. This has set up a durable, above-politics, non-partisan consensus that government should purposefully do what it can to aid adjustment in disadvantaged regions—those undergoing economic disruption and change. Hence German politicians and their constituents in the rural and formerly industrial regions remain supportive of federal and even EU-wide economic adjustment policies and programs.

While not in the US Constitution, our Declaration of Independence promises life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens—but the United States has no such shared consensus to aid residents of region’s struggling with economic change. If anything, the “anti-government” bias of the Tea Party and conservatives has fanned anger over government programs ranging from healthcare extension and social welfare supports, to clean energy and economic development programs—in regions that arguably, have the greatest need for extra government stimulus.

The German government strategy is more about embracing change, and putting it to work to accelerate economic adaptation, a stark contrast to President Trump’s strategy of peddling nostalgia for the “good old days,” trying to bring back jobs that will not be a part of the future economy.

Recognizing the need for climate action, former mining and steel communities, like Bottrap, are organizing around a goal of reducing carbon emissions 50 percent in 10 years. As a prototype for other Innovation Cities, they are testing a model of how to support new sustainable business growth, technology deployment, and build a community with rich quality of life and place. We also witnessed the last coal mine of the Ruhrgebiet cease active operations; ending a 25-year planned phase out of coal and steel mines that once defined this region. Germany supported the effort with generous financial transition aid and with retraining and relocation assistance for displaced workers to find niches in new, growing industries and communities.

is also repurposing old infrastructure. The Zollverein Coal Mine Industrial Complex in Essen, one of the iconic coal and steel facilities that more than a century ago revolutionized these industries, is today a UNESCO World Heritage site, museum, conference area, and start-up incubator. It serves technology firms playing to the region’s strengths and numerous small- and medium-sized enterprises to provide new data and business-to-business solutions.

There is remarkable support for research and development and innovation. The Fraunhofer Institute in Duisdorf, for example, is one of a network of seventy-two public and privately funded applied research institutions sprinkled across Germany that aid Germany’s dense network of SMEs to develop new cutting-edge processes and products. Several new institutes were newly created in former industrial regions beginning twenty-five years ago as part of a deliberate effort to create new centers of talent, research and development, and innovation support as nuclei for economic transformation of their “rust belt’ communities.

The German federal government is extending digital backbones and high-speed internet access to small towns and rural regions so firms, entrepreneurs, families, schools, and research institutions can be full participants in today’s economy. They are also looking past 4G toward revolutionary 5G which will reinvent communications products and processes.

They are accelerating the digital revolution, “Industry 4.0,” moving past automating occupations to building machine learning systems to manage data exchange, networks, inventories, and communications in the Internet of things, and up and down the supply and production chains.

And finally, Germany is working to update the social insurance system and their celebrated occupational training programs to better support adaptation for a fast-changing workplace, including lifelong retraining and recredentialing.

The Germans are certainly planners, and some of these efforts do have a top-down, heavy-handed quality—despite good rhetoric about community participation and inclusion. And I would not trade nor want to kill off the chaotic, entrepreneurial, and hypercompetitive character of our US and Midwest innovation landscape, where no one plans the next disruptive technology, but rather it is sparked and grows spontaneously from our network of public-private research, market-driven technology development end (often immigrant) entrepreneurs. However, a country that commits to do what it can to balance growth and ameliorate yawning geographic and personal opportunity divides can nurture a more equitable economy, as well as a less polarized polity.

In America’s proud industrial heartland, we need leadership willing to name and make real progress on some of the fundamental infrastructures that do underpin economic adaptation and growth: enhancing connectivity, building out from our own leading research and learning institutions, helping workers adapt to change, leveraging our storied history and culture, and embracing the sustainability revolution for economic benefit. More success in these efforts will smooth both our economic differences and the estrangement people in many communities feel from the broader society.

An edited version of this blog has also been published by the Brookings Institution where John Austin is a nonresident senior fellow, Metropolitan Policy Program.


The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. We convene leading global voices and conduct independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is an independent, nonpartisan organization. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in blog posts are the sole responsibility of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council.


| By Laurence Ralph, Thomas Abt, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Police Reform Lessons from Around the World

Princeton University’s Laurence Ralph and the Council on Criminal Justice’s Thomas Abt join Deep Dish to explain why police brutality is not a uniquely American phenomenon and argue the strongest examples of successful police reform come from outside the United States.

| By Pavin Chachavalpongpun, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Thailand’s Youth Demand Democratic Reforms

Political scientist Pavin Chachavalpongpun joins Deep Dish to explain how social media makes these Thailand's pro-democracy protests different than past movements and why the United States should see Thailand as a foreign policy priority when negotiating a rising China.

| By Maha Yahya, Emile Hokayem, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Can Lebanon Overcome Corruption and Crisis?

Carnegie Middle East Center Director Maha Yahya and the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Emile Hokayem join Deep Dish to examine the ongoing protest movement in Lebanon, Hezbollah’s role in the crisis, and how a system built on sectarian politics could be rebuilt.

| By Laura Rosenberger, Jacob Helberg, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Making Cyberspace Safe for Democracy

The Alliance for Security Democracy’s Laura Rosenberger and Stanford University’s Jacob Helberg join Deep Dish to discuss digital interference, misinformation, and data privacy within the lens of geopolitics. 

| By Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Scott Sagan, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Nuclear Threats 75 Years After Hiroshima

Seventy-five years after Hiroshima, former deputy secretary of energy Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall and Stanford University’s Scott Sagan join Deep Dish to examine the threat of nuclear weapons today.

| By Mira Rapp-Hooper, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Why Allies are Key for US Security Today

The Council on Foreign Relations’ Mira Rapp-Hooper joins Deep Dish to explain why the alliance system is still essential for America’s global leadership – but must be remade to meet the challenges of the 21st century. 

| By Adam Segal, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Who’s Winning the US-China Tech War?

The Council on Foreign Relations’ Adam Segal joins Deep Dish to explain the battles between China and the US over products like Huawei and TikTok, their role in US foreign policy, and why US allies are choosing sides. 

| By Judd Devermont, Neil Munshi, Brian Hanson

Deep Dish: Mali’s Instability Threatens the Sahel

This week on Deep Dish, the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Judd Devermont and the Financial Times’ Neil Munshi explain why Mali’s instability is a threat to Africa’s Sahel region — soon to be the West’s largest conflict zone.