October 18, 2019 | By Perri Sheinbaum

Saving Us from Ourselves

Data has shown that if every person lived like an average United States citizen, we would need five earths to sustain us. Americans consume far more resources than any other major country in the world. Earth Overshoot Day—the annual date where humanity’s demand on ecological resources surpasses Earths ability to regenerate in a year—occurred the earliest in history on July 29, 2019. And on top of that, 2018 was the warmest year on record for both the ocean and atmosphere.

The impact of human activities on our planet is astounding. Human consumption of natural resources and systems have exponentially increased in the last one hundred years, from water and energy usage to plastic production. While feeding our need for products and services, we have degraded our oceans and forests through the loss of biodiversity and collapse of fisheries. But this all comes at a cost to our health and wellbeing. In 2015, the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on Planetary Health asserted that human health is directly linked to the management of our natural resources—from air quality, to deforestation, to desertification and more.  

And over the past two years, new assessments and reports have driven this message home. In 2018, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5C, COP24 published a Special Report on Health and Climate Change, and the United States government released the Fourth National Climate Assessment. The reports continued into 2019, with the release of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on climate change and land use. These reports are simply a fraction of the hundreds of reports published detailing the inextricable links between human health and our environment. Recommendations vary from action at the individual level, such as eating a plant-based diet and flying less, to enactment of policies at the city, state, or federal level. Do individual actions ultimately lead to a healthy future? Studies have shown that people are more likely to change their behavior if they see their friend or neighbor doing this new behavior. But does this apply when dealing with a time sensitive crisis?

On October 23, food security researcher, Esther Ngumbi, environmental anthropologist Eduardo Brondizio, and environmental writer Tatiana Schlossberg, will discuss these questions and the issue of individual change verses systemic and policy change. If Americans are using the resources of five earths to maintain our lifestyle, something needs to change. We hope you will join us to explore these issues further.


The Global Food and Agriculture Program aims to inform the development of US policy on global agricultural development and food security by raising awareness and providing resources, information, and policy analysis to the US Administration, Congress, and interested experts and organizations.

The Global Food and Agriculture Program is housed within the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. The Council on Global Affairs convenes leading global voices and conducts independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

Support for the Global Food and Agriculture Program is generously provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


1,000 Days Blog, 1,000 Days

Africa Can End Poverty, World Bank

Agrilinks Blog

Bread Blog, Bread for the World

Can We Feed the World Blog, Agriculture for Impact

Concern Blogs, Concern Worldwide

Institute Insights, Bread for the World Institute

End Poverty in South Asia, World Bank

Global Development Blog, Center for Global Development

The Global Food Banking Network

Harvest 2050, Global Harvest Initiative

The Hunger and Undernutrition Blog, Humanitas Global Development

International Food Policy Research Institute News, IFPRI

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Blog, CIMMYT

ONE Blog, ONE Campaign

One Acre Fund Blog, One Acre Fund

Overseas Development Institute Blog, Overseas Development Institute

Oxfam America Blog, Oxfam America

Preventing Postharvest Loss, ADM Institute

Sense & Sustainability Blog, Sense & Sustainability

WFP USA Blog, World Food Program USA


| By Lisa Moon

Guest Commentary - Reduce Food Loss & Waste, Feed Millions

Studies show that one-third of all food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted, enough to feed 1.9 billion people-almost the same amount as are experiencing food insecurity. Food banks are uniquely positioned to address the paradox of global hunger and food loss and waste. 

| By Colin Christensen , Eva Koehler

Guest Commentary - The Plague You’ve Never Heard About Could be as Destructive as COVID-19: How the Threat from Desert Locusts Shows the Need for Innovations in how Organizations Scale

The international community needs to mobilize to combat the plague of locusts devouring East Africa. At the same time however, we should also consider the long-term investments we must make to build lasting resilience to climate change among smallholder populations.

| By Sarah Bingaman Schwartz, Maria Jones

Guest Commentary - Reducing Food Loss and Waste by Improving Smallholder Storage

Reducing postharvest losses by half would result in enough food to feed a billion people, increase smallholder income levels and minimize pressure on natural resources. The ADM Institute for the Prevention of Postharvest Loss works with smallholders in Bihar to improve storage and reduce loss. 

| By Mark Titterington

Guest Commentary - A European perspective on the journey to a regenerative agriculture system…

Regenerative farming practices can lead to improved soil health and farm productivity and profitability, boosting crop quality and yields, improving the resilience of farms to extreme weather events and reducing the propensity for soil degradation and run-off, but most excitingly, creates the opportunity to actually draw down and store carbon from the atmosphere in agriculture soils.

| By Peter Carberry

Field Notes - Brokering Research Crucial for Climate-Proofing Drylands

9 out of 12 interventions identified for agriculture by the Global Commission on Adaptation involve research and development. For smallholder farmers in drylands, some of the most vulnerable to climate change, the role of innovation brokers may prove just as important as doing the science itself.