September 5, 2014

New Technologies in Agriculture: Promises and Pitfalls

Next Generation Delegation 2014 Commentary Series

By Adam Riesselman, PhD Candidate in Bioinformatics and Integrative Genomics at Harvard University and 2014 Next Generation Delegate

As a bioinformaticist, I like to think that biology acts in entirely predictable ways: our only limitations rest on access to information, efficient retrieval, and clever biological insight. Big Agriculture is also betting on technology and data management in the productive fields of the United States. If agricultural inputs can be boiled down to numbers—such as plant yield across fields, soil quality, chemical input, planting rate, and seed variety—more cost-efficient agronomic solutions can be found.

Adding data management practices to agriculture is well-founded: with cereal yield growths plateauing, growers need a new tool to apply to their fields. Platforms such as John Deere's GreenStar, Ag Leader, and Monsanto's FieldScripts promise $5-9 savings per acre by variable rate planting, minding replanting at endrows, crop variety selection per location, and selectively applying chemicals and fertilizer.

Applying this technology to agricultural production, however, can be complicated. With the average age of the US farmer currently at 55 years old, many precision agriculture end users are often left in the dust about the finer details of data management. Moreover, as farmers age, planting is increasingly being performed by drones, such as computers that drive and control planters, combines, and tractors. Moreover, the line between farmers' control and corporate control of agricultural data is being blurred, both in regards to data obtained throughout the growing season as well as the actual mechanical control of the machine.

The abstraction of farming decisions from the grower to a data-driven corporation will become even more widespread in the future. For example, using Monsanto’s FieldScripts program, growers give the company data such as field boundaries, past yield data, and fertility tests. Monsanto then selects the planting rate and crop variety across the field. This information is uploaded onto the computer in the planter, and the machine takes off to automatically plant the field.

Effective data management practices are paramount in these situations to mitigate any disruptions to our food supply. For instance, yield data is uploaded to a digital cloud whenever the tractor is run through the field. Many farmers are unaware of who owns the data produced on their fields and who it can be shared with. Could this data be used to manipulate agricultural markets if yield information is known instantaneously? Monsanto has already experienced a data breach in their precision agriculture system which could lead to further unintentional release of confidential farm information.

Moreover, malware and other deleterious software could be used to seriously disrupt our food supply. Weaknesses in network security can be found in nearly every computer system connected to the internet. With planters, combines, and tractors constantly interconnected with satellite or cell phone transmissions, network security should not be overlooked. Foreign entities could use digital attacks such as Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS), Permanent Denial of Service (PDoS), or viruses to render our planters useless in the spring. Our combines and sprayers could sit idle in the field if mechanical components were fried by malicious code sent through the web.

Though agriculture can be abstracted down to data points on a field map, we must use this technology wisely. Vulnerabilities come with a lack of diversity in a network system. If the network is down, our food production system is at risk as well. Data security has now become food security.


The Global Food and Agriculture Program aims to inform the development of US policy on global agricultural development and food security by raising awareness and providing resources, information, and policy analysis to the US Administration, Congress, and interested experts and organizations.

The Global Food and Agriculture Program is housed within the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. The Council on Global Affairs convenes leading global voices and conducts independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

Support for the Global Food and Agriculture Program is generously provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


1,000 Days Blog, 1,000 Days

Africa Can End Poverty, World Bank

Agrilinks Blog

Bread Blog, Bread for the World

Can We Feed the World Blog, Agriculture for Impact

Concern Blogs, Concern Worldwide

Institute Insights, Bread for the World Institute

End Poverty in South Asia, World Bank

Global Development Blog, Center for Global Development

The Global Food Banking Network

Harvest 2050, Global Harvest Initiative

The Hunger and Undernutrition Blog, Humanitas Global Development

International Food Policy Research Institute News, IFPRI

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Blog, CIMMYT

ONE Blog, ONE Campaign

One Acre Fund Blog, One Acre Fund

Overseas Development Institute Blog, Overseas Development Institute

Oxfam America Blog, Oxfam America

Preventing Postharvest Loss, ADM Institute

Sense & Sustainability Blog, Sense & Sustainability

WFP USA Blog, World Food Program USA