Participating in the 2014 World Food Prize Week got me thinking about water and how we can best use this scarce resource to produce more food.
The world’s population is expected to reach nine to 10 billion by 2050, causing a doubling in food demand. And not only is the population growing, it’s also becoming more prosperous. As incomes rise, people have the means to eat more meat and dairy products, which require much more grain. At the same time, corn, soybeans and other crops are being diverted to biofuel production, which places additional pressure on food supply, while urban expansion often comes at the expense of prime agricultural land, with only drier, less fertile land to replace it. The result of these trends is an escalating need for agriculture to produce more food, feed, fiber and fuel on a limited supply of good farmland, and intense competition for water resources.
Agriculture now utilizes more than 70 percent of the world’s freshwater resources, the vast majority used for irrigating crops. Indeed, irrigated production uses only 18 percent of total farm land and yet contributes 40 percent of global food supply. Yet lack of water for irrigating crops is a constraint to producing food for hundreds of millions of people in the world. In some areas, water is scarce due to large population and/or too little rainfall, such as in the US Southwest. In other regions, such as parts of sub-Saharan Africa, water may be available, but access to pumps, power, and appropriate technologies limits agricultural development. Or water may be unusable due to pollutants and toxic contaminants. In addition, free-flowing water in streams and rivers is needed to maintain wildlife and biodiversity in riparian ecosystems.
Given this situation, the best way to meet global food demand is to double crop yields on existing farmland and achieving highest possible water use efficiency. While water conservation efforts and wasting less food can help, they can’t replace the need for massive yield increases. This increase in yield must come with a reduction in the environmental footprint of agriculture, which is something that has proven difficult to accomplish, even during the green revolution of the past 50 years.
But where can we increase yields the most? How do we know which land has reached its full production potential, and which has more to give? And among areas with large potential for higher yields, where is it possible to do so with the smallest requirements for energy and fertilizers or to consistently produce high yields in the face of variable and changing climate?
To help answer these questions at local-to-global scales, there is a new tool called the Global Yield Gap and Water Productivity Atlas. Using the best available science and data, the Atlas measures the difference in what existing farmlands are producing, and what these lands could be producing—a difference known as the yield gap. The Atlas also measures the efficiency with which water is converted to food, or water productivity.
Unlike previous efforts to estimate yield potential and yield gaps, the Atlas uses a “bottom-up” approach. For four years, Faculty Fellows of the Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Institute at the University of Nebraska and their colleagues at Wageningen University in the Netherlands have partnered with agronomists worldwide to collect data about local conditions and farming methods that are required to provide realistic estimates of potential yields and yield gaps. These results are then scaled to national, regional and global levels based on “weighting” each local estimate for its contribution to total production.
The Atlas enables farmers and other stakeholders to identify regions with the greatest potential to produce more food in a sustainable manner by getting the most bang for the buck from prudent use of inputs such as better seed, fertilizer—and water.
The data show that Sub-Saharan Africa—primarily smallholder farmers practicing subsistence agriculture in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda—can potentially increase yields of existing farms by twofold or more. And when coupled with data on location of water resources that could sustainably be used for irrigation, it is possible to identify areas where investment in appropriate-scale irrigation infrastructure will have greatest benefits for African farmers.
For example, studies have shown that Ethiopia’s surface water and groundwater supplies could irrigate 10 times as much land than at present, and the Atlas can identify which of these areas have the largest exploitable yield gaps. Within each of these areas, a key issue is estimating the amount of water that can be used for irrigation based aquifer re-charge rates or the water flow in streams and rivers required to maintain ecological integrity of riparian habitat and limiting the scale of irrigated area accordingly.
Together, closing exploitable yield gaps in rainfed agriculture and strategic expansion of irrigation are the keys to reducing rural poverty and improving nutrition in rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa, South and Southeast Asia. The Global Yield Gap Atlas will help show the way.
The Global Food and Agriculture Program aims to inform the development of US policy on global agricultural development and food security by raising awareness and providing resources, information, and policy analysis to the US Administration, Congress, and interested experts and organizations.
The Global Food and Agriculture Program is housed within the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. The Council on Global Affairs convenes leading global voices and conducts independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.
Support for the Global Food and Agriculture Program is generously provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
1,000 Days Blog, 1,000 Days
Africa Can End Poverty, World Bank
Bread Blog, Bread for the World
Can We Feed the World Blog, Agriculture for Impact
Concern Blogs, Concern Worldwide
Institute Insights, Bread for the World Institute
End Poverty in South Asia, World Bank
Global Development Blog, Center for Global Development
The Global Food Banking Network
Harvest 2050, Global Harvest Initiative
The Hunger and Undernutrition Blog, Humanitas Global Development
International Food Policy Research Institute News, IFPRI
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Blog, CIMMYT
ONE Blog, ONE Campaign
One Acre Fund Blog, One Acre Fund
Overseas Development Institute Blog, Overseas Development Institute
Oxfam America Blog, Oxfam America
Preventing Postharvest Loss, ADM Institute
Sense & Sustainability Blog, Sense & Sustainability
WFP USA Blog, World Food Program USA
Guest Commentary - Closing the Gap with Impact Investing: Reassuring Trust in the Sustainable Development Goals
Council intern and New York University student Lauren Stadler writes about the complexities and opportunities in achieving SDG2.
John Willard III, CEO of CAW Industries, Inc., saw a great business opportunity for their product in Africa. But their capability as a small-sized company to successfully enter into agricultural markets on the African continent does not have to be unique.
Diets are rapidly changing, but these new options can have severe consequences on health.
Traditional methods of evaluating childern for malnurition can be uncomfortable for the child and subject to human error. But 3D imagery technology offers a new way to gather data.
A lot can change in a decade-It was just over 10 years ago that the world was reeling from high fuel and fertilizer prices, food price spikes and related civil unrest.
In the latest piece from the Agri-Pulse and Council collaboration, Rep. Rodney Davis and Dr. Peter Goldsmith champion efforts to improve the way we produce, enhance, and deliver technologies needed to improve our food systems.
Our 15th and final post in the 2018 Next Generation blog series is by Neeti Nayak, masters in design engineering candidate in innovation and systems design at Harvard University.
Our 14th post in the 2018 Next Generation blog series is by Longwen Chiang, MA candidate in Economics and Management at the Yenching Academy at Peking University.
Our 13th post in the Next Generation blog series is by Sulav Paudel, PhD candidate in entomology and international agriculture and development at Pennsylvania State University.