Expert commentary and analysis on global agriculture and food.
March 8, 2018 | By
Guest Commentary - Strengthening Women's Land Rights: The Neglected Lever Towards Increasing Ag Production
By Frank Pichel, co-founder, chief program officer, and interim CEO of Cadasta Foundation
Efforts to improve the agricultural production of hundreds of millions of subsistence farmers around the world like Liberia’s Kou Berpa have - for the most part - focused on the usual trifecta: improving her access to technology, quality inputs, and markets.
But there is a growing body of research that suggests these efforts are missing a critical lever: improving her inheritance rights.
Most recently, a study in Zambia found “consistent evidence of reduced land investment by married couples in villages where widows are less likely to inherit land.”
It has long been understood that women inherit poverty not property in much of the world. Widows do not have equal inheritance rights by law in 35 countries and in about half the countries around the world women face legal and customary challenges to their ownership, inheritance, and management of land. Many have decried the impact this has on the world’s 258.5 million widows and the 584.6 million children who depend on them, vulnerable families who are often pushed off their land, evicted from their home, and left without an way to support themselves.
But this latest study shows that the devastating impact of denying women their economic rights begins long before a woman is widowed. In fact, denying women their land rights dampens agricultural investment by both men and women - potentially for decades.
We must acknowledge that hundreds of millions of women around the world are undermined by a web of laws and customs that cast a long-shadow over their lives, undermining their efforts to climb out poverty. And we must rectify that without security, opportunity, and stability not only makes women like Kou Berpa (whose story you can read here) poorer and less resilient, it disadvantages us all.
The study, conducted by Brian Dillon of the University of Washington and Alessandra Voena of the University of Chicago, which will be published later this year, found that the threat of being displaced upon becoming a widow disincentivized critical investments in land. Couples in villages where women do not inherit land apply 37 to 50 percent less fertilizer, fallow 12 to 16 percent less land area, and use labor intensive techniques to reduce soil erosion on 7 to 11 percent fewer acres. What’s more, all of these investments impact agricultural production not just in the current season, but for many seasons to come -- reducing land productivity over the long term.
Dillon and Voena write, “...households that observe their leaders expropriating widows’ land make small but important adjustments to invest less capital in their land.”
Consider the impact of these small decisions to invest less capital in their land, replicated again and again in village after village. Consider the world’s 564 million women farmers and how they might, if assured long-term rights to their land, be better stewards of the land, grow more food, and better feed and care for their families.
This study, only the most recent addition to a deep pool of research demonstrating the key role women’s land rights play in agricultural productivity, should prompt a reassessment of agricultural production and food security interventions and give efforts to strengthen women’s land rights added urgency.
At a time when we are scrambling to feed a growing planet and working to eradicate extreme poverty, national and global leaders must ensure that women, who make up 20 percent of the agricultural labor force in Latin American and nearly 50 percent of the ag labor force in East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, are positioned to maximize the land they farm.
A fundamental way of achieving this is strengthening women’s rights to their most important asset - the land they rely on.
Over the last two decades a number of countries have made important strides in this regard. Rwanda, Kenya, and India have all passed laws to strengthen women’s rights to own, inherit, and manage land. They have also supported policies and programs to make those rights a reality for women, by educating local leaders about the need to support and protect women’s rights. These programs should be supported and replicated.
As we celebrate International Women’s Day, I invite you to join the growing movement in support of women’s land rights. You can learn more about the issue and read the land rights stories from women around the world on a new website launched by my organization, Cadasta Foundation, and our partners, including BRAC, Oxfam, and Landesa: http://www.herlandherstory.com/ and join the coversation about the campaign by following #HerLandHerStory
The Global Food and Agriculture Program aims to inform the development of US policy on global agricultural development and food security by raising awareness and providing resources, information, and policy analysis to the US Administration, Congress, and interested experts and organizations.
The Global Food and Agriculture Program is housed within the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. The Council on Global Affairs convenes leading global voices and conducts independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.
Support for the Global Food and Agriculture Program is generously provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The Chicago Council's Global Agricultural Development Initiative is pleased to release a new Issue Brief, “National and Global Market Implications of the 2012 US Drought," authored by Wallace E. Tyner.
There are rumors that U.S. food aid programs could see major changes in the next budget, including converting some of the Food for Peace program into straight cash grants instead of in-kind food assistance.
The year I was born, the population on the planet was around 3 billion, Israel was in a fight for survival with its neighbors, and John McCain was shot down over Vietnam. Some things don’t seem to have changed much, but farmers now feed an additional 4 billion consumers annually.
The young man from the farm was looking smart in an olive green suit, salmon tie and cufflinks. His black shoes were a bit scuffed, but his English was polished. “We are moving forward,” he said. “Forward ever, backward never.”