February 20, 2020 | By Erin Sweeney

Guest Commentary - Investing in Innovation: Food, Agriculture and Forestry in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia is a leading agricultural exporter, placing it at the fulcrum of the global food system. It is responsible for 85 percent of global palm oil production, 75 percent of global natural rubber production and 31 percent of global rice production. It is no surprise then that – as the region becomes increasingly vulnerable to climate change in the face of a world that will double its demand for food by 2050 - the hum of interest from investors looking for “responsible” investments in Southeast Asia’s agriculture landscape has grown to an audible buzz.

Questions do, however, remain. While there is interest, investors want to know where to find best projects to invest in, what constitutes “most responsible” in the first place, and, quite rightly so, how they can try to guarantee the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) criteria of the investment are met in a region where traceability and transparency across agriculture supply chains are often lacking.

While there are hundreds of credible platforms, partnerships, and third-party accreditors that provide (varied) answers to these questions, we hope this piece helps you cut through the noise and provides some insight on how investors are, and perhaps should be, approaching such investments.

In Search of the Next Big Thing

Given the multiplicity of challenges facing the rural farming economies in Southeast Asia (which also produce the vast majority of agricultural product coming out of the region), start-up ag-tech solutions are positioned to have a positive impact across multiple social, economic and environmental indicators. Around the world, investors are hoping to find the unicorn among companies that meet their goals to do good and simultaneously yield impressive returns.

From Grow Asia’s work in this space, we note several innovative ag-tech solutions emerging from Southeast Asia that are attracting considerable attention. In Myanmar, Tun Yat is improving smallholder farmers’ access to mechanization by allocating tractors more effectively during land preparation, acting as an “Uber” for tractors. In Indonesia, a digital lending platform, CROWDE, has already helped 17,000 farmers access credit to buy critical inputs at the start of the cropping season.

Looking Within

Other types of investors (i.e. agribusinesses along the supply chain) are looking for innovative ways to leverage their ESG targets for greater returns and, hopefully, de-risked investments. In 2018, Olam International Limited (Olam) finalized Southeast Asia’s first sustainability-KPI linked revolving credit facility, to pay debts along their agri supply chains. If Olam’s linked projects hit their KPI targets, the interest rate decreases, and they demonstrate a strong business case for responsible investing. Similar efforts by national stock exchanges (like the Stock Exchange of Thailand) encourage listed companies to invest responsibly along their supply chains, through ranking and awards systems.

Financial Institutions (FIs) are beginning to look for de-risked opportunities to back innovative projects like Olam’s sustainability-linked loan.  Sustainable finance reporting giants like the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and regional partnership efforts - Asia Sustainable Finance Initiative, provide FIs with plenty of information about ESG targets and what to measure. Scoring systems are beginning to rate FIs on their levels of commitment and outcomes on sustainability targets in ASEAN (such as World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) SUSBA report). Yet, with domestic banks and non-listed companies still largely dominating the market in the region, these structures may not target nor reach where majority of the impact occurs.

The Question of Risk

There are of course risks beyond simply failing to meet the return on investment in the ESG model for investors in any sector. Once investors promise compliance, they must grapple with the possibility of human rights violations, land grabs, climate catastrophes, and contract breaches, just to name a few. In the case of working with start-ups, how do investors know these companies can scale their solutions and prove their ESG impact while guaranteeing the target Return on Investment (ROI)?

Given the myriad challenges to getting responsible ROI, international experts are questioning the validity of sustainability efforts among agribusinesses (facing unmet deforestation targets in 2020) and capacity of impact investors to make significant change (recent reviews show “responsible investments” still lack real impact on ESG targets).

Without innovative (and perhaps more importantly, proven) strategies for benchmarking the responsible or ethical practices among investees in the field, the real impact of ESG-linked investments may remain stagnant – and in this era of rapidly changing climate conditions, strategic and successful tactics are required.

Guidelines on Responsible Investment in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (FAF)

We believe that multisectoral, regionally appropriate approaches may provide a solution to the challenge. In Southeast Asia, an innovative approach has been developed that has the potential to create a measurable increase in the quantity and quality of responsible and sustainable private sector investment in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (FAF) across ASEAN.

In response to rapid urbanization, increased Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), and growing inequality in the region, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Secretariat identified a need for such an approach in the FAF. At their request, Grow Asia and its partners – in consultation with over 300 players in the space - developed the ASEAN Guidelines for Promoting Responsible Investment in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (ASEAN RAI Guidelines), the world’s first regionally-contextualized guidance based on the principles established by the Committee on Food Security.

The key purpose of the Guidelines is to promote responsible and inclusive investments in FAF in the ASEAN region that contribute to regional economic development, food and nutrition security, food safety and equitable benefits, as well as the sustainable use of natural resources. The Guidelines target:

  • Establishing favourable conditions to attract responsible investment in FAF through a clear policy and regulatory framework nationally, and a coherent approach across ASEAN;
  • Strengthening the capacities of stakeholders, encouraging and enabling investors to meet their obligations, and creating instruments and tools to further cooperation;
  • Creating a framework to guide ASEAN member states, large and small investors, and other actors in the development of responsible and sustainable FAF investment and value chains in the region; and
  • Agreeing on a set of mutual concerns and interests, which serves as a reference for stakeholders’ decisions, behaviours and actions.

Grow Asia, together with the ASEAN Secretariat and international organizations and experts, is about to embark on a 10-year implementation plan to test our theory: that multistakeholder, locally-contextualized, scalable approaches will most efficiently and effectively drive investment in FAF supply chain solutions and large-scale projects.

Our implementation plan approach is three pronged:

  1. Multistakeholder: Bolster government, private and civil society actors’ learning, knowledge and capacity to proactively devise and help apply measures and solutions (by developing and delivering a regional blended learning and accreditation program and hosting regional and national capacity building and knowledge sharing events on how to operationalize the Guidelines in real world scenarios.)
  2. Locally-contextualized: Improve the ability of ASEAN member states to develop national-level legal and policy frameworks, processes and practices (by providing on-demand legal and policy advisory services to national government officials and delivering bespoke capacity building services for national officials)
  3. Scalable: Ensure the Guidelines remain an action-oriented, living document that adapts to new learnings and regional trends (by embedding the knowledge and capacity building tactics into a respected business institution that leads future development and training on the Guidelines)

The stakeholders involved in making investments more responsible (from agribusinesses to impact investors to traditional banks) have said they need on-the-ground support to take action. Governments have (for many reasons) not yet widely integrated the responsible requirements into their investment policies, and domestic and SME agri-investors still hesitate to (publicly) adopt or operationalize responsible investing principles.  Grow Asia and our partners will leverage the knowledge captured as we implement the ASEAN RAI Guidelines to facilitate the institutionalization of expertise from lived experiences among diverse stakeholders in specific community contexts. We will not provide that support directly, nor create another set of standards for investors to follow.

The ASEAN RAI Guidelines have yet to be proven in the field. But as we launch our 10-year multi-scalar, multi-stakeholder implementation plan at the field level, we will glean learnings about best practices in this innovative strategy for investing. We hope that learnings from ASEAN can be informed and inform responsible investing around the world. Therefore, we ask you to send examples of in-progress or successful investments made in FAF solutions (digital or supply chain projects) that ensured a responsible -- multistakeholder, locally-contextualized, or scalable -- approach. We look forward to learning from international case studies – please reach out and share examples you have supported.  

 

Read our previous posts in the Breaking Ground series:

Guest Commentary - The Critical Role of Women in Transforming the Food System

Guest Commentary - Adopting Conserving Agricultural Practices: A Farmer's Perspective

Field Notes - To Meat or Not to Meat: Balancing Global Viewpoints in Battles over Food

Field Notes - Boosting Nutrition and Sustainability through Superfoods in Local Food Systems

Guest Commentary - Envisioning the Future of Food in Times of Change

Field Notes: Biocontrol of the Fall Armyworm - Long-term Resilience for Small-scalle Farmers

About

The Global Food and Agriculture Program aims to inform the development of US policy on global agricultural development and food security by raising awareness and providing resources, information, and policy analysis to the US Administration, Congress, and interested experts and organizations.

The Global Food and Agriculture Program is housed within the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. The Council on Global Affairs convenes leading global voices and conducts independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

Support for the Global Food and Agriculture Program is generously provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Blogroll

1,000 Days Blog, 1,000 Days

Africa Can End Poverty, World Bank

Agrilinks Blog

Bread Blog, Bread for the World

Can We Feed the World Blog, Agriculture for Impact

Concern Blogs, Concern Worldwide

Institute Insights, Bread for the World Institute

End Poverty in South Asia, World Bank

Global Development Blog, Center for Global Development

The Global Food Banking Network

Harvest 2050, Global Harvest Initiative

The Hunger and Undernutrition Blog, Humanitas Global Development

International Food Policy Research Institute News, IFPRI

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Blog, CIMMYT

ONE Blog, ONE Campaign

One Acre Fund Blog, One Acre Fund

Overseas Development Institute Blog, Overseas Development Institute

Oxfam America Blog, Oxfam America

Preventing Postharvest Loss, ADM Institute

Sense & Sustainability Blog, Sense & Sustainability

WFP USA Blog, World Food Program USA

Archive



| By Sarah Bingaman Schwartz, Maria Jones

Guest Commentary - Reducing Food Loss and Waste by Improving Smallholder Storage

Reducing postharvest losses by half would result in enough food to feed a billion people, increase smallholder income levels and minimize pressure on natural resources. The ADM Institute for the Prevention of Postharvest Loss works with smallholders in Bihar to improve storage and reduce loss. 








| By Mark Titterington

Guest Commentary - A European perspective on the journey to a regenerative agriculture system…

Regenerative farming practices can lead to improved soil health and farm productivity and profitability, boosting crop quality and yields, improving the resilience of farms to extreme weather events and reducing the propensity for soil degradation and run-off, but most excitingly, creates the opportunity to actually draw down and store carbon from the atmosphere in agriculture soils.


| By Peter Carberry

Field Notes - Brokering Research Crucial for Climate-Proofing Drylands

9 out of 12 interventions identified for agriculture by the Global Commission on Adaptation involve research and development. For smallholder farmers in drylands, some of the most vulnerable to climate change, the role of innovation brokers may prove just as important as doing the science itself. 




| By Julius A. Nukpezah, Joseph T. Steensma, Nhuong Tran, Kelvin M. Shikuku

Field Notes - Reducing Post-Harvest Losses in Nigeria's Aquaculture Sector Contributes to Sustainable Development

While increasing fish production and productivity in the long term are practical strategies for addressing malnutrition in Nigeria, reducing post-harvest losses of fish is an economic and a rational strategy of increasing value of aquaculture businesses that lead to sustainable economic development.