January 17, 2020 | By Margaret Cornelius, Nicolas Gatti, Peter Goldsmith, Edward Martey

Guest Commentary - Addressing the barriers to soybean production in Africa

Worldwide production of soybean has grown at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.68 percent since 1961, while African production levels are rising 48 percent faster at a rate of 6.84 percent per year. Yet, African producers still supply less than 1 percent of the world’s soybeans. South Africa, Nigeria, and Zambia are the top three soybean producers on the African continent and together make up 39 percent of Africa’s production. Sub-Saharan African (SSA) producers yield about one third of those found in the leading soybean countries of the world, such as the U.S. and Brazil. The low yields result from the proliferation of a low input management system by SSA farmers. Due to the high cost of inputs and a lack of access to credit, SSA farmers predominantly use saved seed, few inputs, and low seed populations. This low input model preferred by farmers and development practitioners is admittedly low cost, but results in low outputs as measured by yield, returns to labor, and profitability. This low input - low output model, which predominates in the tropics of Africa, stands opposed to the successful high-input-high output model used in the tropics of South America. 

Soybean Production, World v. Africa, 3-year average (2015-2017)

Africa remains a minor player within the global soybean production scene. Levels of production are low, as are growth rates in yield. Total production in the region is rising faster than the world as a whole, but that increase originates from a very low base of production. Shifting from a low input – low output system to a high input – high output system could increase African soybean yields by as much as five times. Mechanization, better agronomic management practices, and high input levels could maximize the potential of soybean production in the tropics. While low input systems are low cost and easy for a donor or development practitioner to extend to farmers, they are not productive and thus are not effective at expanding the domestic supply of soybean. High input systems are necessary in the tropics, and proven to be economically sustainable, but challenge small holders due to the high cost and management burden.

While the demand for soybean continues to increase across Africa for meal, oil, and human consumption, the supply continues to lag. In Ghana, the domestic supply lags behind demand by as much as two-thirds, requiring the country to import soybean grain, meal, and oil. While soybean production in Ghana for example has shown significant growth in the last decade, this is in comparison to a very low base of production as mentioned previously. Smallholder production inefficiencies due to low yields excessively raises costs per bushel, making them unable to compete in the international market. These farmers are producing small quantities, possibly combined with poor quality, limited storage, cash sales at harvest, and must travel long distances from buying centers which all contribute to significant increases in price. Small holder farmers in Africa face the challenge of poor scale economies, weak infrastructure, and consistently low yields.

Increasing inputs can have a significant impact on soybean yields. This is exemplified in the SMART (Soybean Management with Appropriate Research and Technology) Farms operated by SIL agronomists in Ghana, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Zambia. The research from the SMART farm guides researchers and development practitioners on an optimal path for soybean adoption by smallholder farmers across Sub-Saharan Africa. The research for development design presents a step-wise approach of designed input bundles that incrementally advance producers up the management ladder to higher yields and profitability.

Effects of various input bundling treatments on soybean yields in Ghana. Farmer = typical farmer practice;    Control = certified seed only; I = inoculum (NoduMax); L = lime (Calciprill); P = phosphorous (TSP 46 percent)

 

SMART Farm research shows soybean yields can increase by 2.5 times by using appropriate agronomic practices and input bundles such as the Green bundle.

This blog piece is a summarization of three separate articles (Soybean Costs of Production by Dr. Peter Goldsmith, Soybean Prices by Dr. Edward Martey, Dr. Peter Goldsmith, and Dr. Nicholas Gatti, and Soybean Yield in Africa by Margaret Cornelius and Dr. Peter Goldsmith) that were previously published as part of a 12-part series entitled The State of Soybean in Africa.

About

The Global Food and Agriculture Program aims to inform the development of US policy on global agricultural development and food security by raising awareness and providing resources, information, and policy analysis to the US Administration, Congress, and interested experts and organizations.

The Global Food and Agriculture Program is housed within the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. The Council on Global Affairs convenes leading global voices and conducts independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

Support for the Global Food and Agriculture Program is generously provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Blogroll

1,000 Days Blog, 1,000 Days

Africa Can End Poverty, World Bank

Agrilinks Blog

Bread Blog, Bread for the World

Can We Feed the World Blog, Agriculture for Impact

Concern Blogs, Concern Worldwide

Institute Insights, Bread for the World Institute

End Poverty in South Asia, World Bank

Global Development Blog, Center for Global Development

The Global Food Banking Network

Harvest 2050, Global Harvest Initiative

The Hunger and Undernutrition Blog, Humanitas Global Development

International Food Policy Research Institute News, IFPRI

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Blog, CIMMYT

ONE Blog, ONE Campaign

One Acre Fund Blog, One Acre Fund

Overseas Development Institute Blog, Overseas Development Institute

Oxfam America Blog, Oxfam America

Preventing Postharvest Loss, ADM Institute

Sense & Sustainability Blog, Sense & Sustainability

WFP USA Blog, World Food Program USA

Archive




| By Lisa Moon

Guest Commentary - Reduce Food Loss & Waste, Feed Millions

Studies show that one-third of all food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted, enough to feed 1.9 billion people-almost the same amount as are experiencing food insecurity. Food banks are uniquely positioned to address the paradox of global hunger and food loss and waste. 


| By Colin Christensen, Eva Koehler

Guest Commentary - The Plague You’ve Never Heard About Could be as Destructive as COVID-19: How the Threat from Desert Locusts Shows the Need for Innovations in how Organizations Scale

The international community needs to mobilize to combat the plague of locusts devouring East Africa. At the same time however, we should also consider the long-term investments we must make to build lasting resilience to climate change among smallholder populations.




| By Sarah Bingaman Schwartz, Maria Jones

Guest Commentary - Reducing Food Loss and Waste by Improving Smallholder Storage

Reducing postharvest losses by half would result in enough food to feed a billion people, increase smallholder income levels and minimize pressure on natural resources. The ADM Institute for the Prevention of Postharvest Loss works with smallholders in Bihar to improve storage and reduce loss. 








| By Mark Titterington

Guest Commentary - A European perspective on the journey to a regenerative agriculture system…

Regenerative farming practices can lead to improved soil health and farm productivity and profitability, boosting crop quality and yields, improving the resilience of farms to extreme weather events and reducing the propensity for soil degradation and run-off, but most excitingly, creates the opportunity to actually draw down and store carbon from the atmosphere in agriculture soils.