April 7, 2020 | By Jacob van Etten

Field Notes - How do we Understand the Needs of the Rural Poor on a Global Scale? One Family Farm at a Time 

The Chicago Council is pleased to launch a new blog series, “Breaking Ground,” to explore how food systems innovation and agricultural research and development can empower farmers and feed the world. A special subsection of our series, “Field Notes,” features voices from Feed the Future Innovation Labs and CGIAR centers.

The days of top-down, one-size-fits-all “solutions” for poor rural farmers are gone. Scientists interested in development questions have known this for some time. They fan out across the globe, questionnaires in hand, to learn about the needs of coffee producers in Honduras, bean growers in Kenya, and rice farmers in Vietnam. This works well to tailor research-for-development projects to local circumstances. But researchers overlook one critical element: standardizing surveys so others could use the information they gathered. 

A team of scientists at the CGIAR, a consortium of international research institutes, set out to change this. They pioneered and standardized a survey system and brought on dozens of colleagues to help deploy it across the rural tropics. We published our first analysis of our surveys in February in Scientific Data, an open-access journal from Nature for the description of scientifically valuable datasets. 

In the paper, we describe the Rural Household Multiple Indicator Survey, or RHoMIS, and explain how to access and analyze data collected from 13,000-plus households from 21 countries. Adoption of the tool has been phenomenal. Between writing the paper and publishing it – about six months – RHoMIS  grew to include 31,000 households from 33 countries. Data from surveys are added almost daily. 

Today, researchers, development agencies, governments and NGOs are using RHoMIS to effectively invest development money according to local needs. Simultaneously, data collectors are contributing to what we hope will become the largest, standardized open-access database of its kind. 

Big Data, Meet Smallholder 

As an agricultural and environmental researcher who relies upon reams of data, standardization is revolutionizing the way my colleagues and I work with surveys. Instead of taking months to crunch numbers – to estimate the carbon footprint of a farm, compare the economic benefits of one crop versus another, analyze the role of gender in a given household, or quantify agricultural biodiversity of a given community, to name just a few – we get these numbers almost instantaneously. These analyses used to take months. 

RHoMIS also allows us to stand back and map the multiple variables – more than 700 that we have divided into 40 groups – that affect the farmers’ bottom lines and wellbeing. While we can still make global analyses concerning access to credit, adaptation and mitigation to climate change, the role of women in households, and nutritional and food security needs, we can zoom in and analyze the effectiveness of specific actions.  

Numerous studies have already been published using RHoMIS, including research on  climate-smart agriculture in East Africa and Central America, changes over time in l ivelihoods and food security in Tanzania, identifying farmer innovators who have improved farm sustainability, using  mobile phone services for tailored agricultural advice in East Africa, and  food security research in Central America’s dry corridor.  

One of the things I’m most excited about is the use of this tool for citizen science, the direct involvement of volunteers in scientific research. Citizen science has been done primarily in ecological research, for example, by bird watchers who record their sightings in an app and contribute these data to science. For agriculture, we have recently shown that it is possible to engage farmers massively in testing different technology options, such as crop varieties or crop management practices. Usually, technologies are created in a laboratory or experimental setting and then tested only on a handful of farms, leading to very imprecise recommendations. By linking test results on thousands of farms to data about those farms, we can provide very precise recommendations. 

These new data-driven tools are quickly finding practical applications. RHoMIS is already being used for development work. One example is the Tree Aid, an NGO that plants valuable trees to help rural communities and uses the tool to evaluate  its income-enhancing work in West Africa. One Acre Fund, another non-profit, is using RHoMIS to make credit decisions, and is piloting citizen science to test varieties of maize, cassava and potato with farmers in Rwanda.  

A tool for the SDGs 

For the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be successful, progress in one area should not be achieved at the expense of another area. Therefore, progress towards the SDG targets is tracked simultaneously by 232 unique indicators. Also, rural livelihoods are far too complex to distill into a single indicator of well-being. Improved food security and income are essential, but we cannot work to achieve these goals while ignoring the environment, gender or income distribution in households.  

As the study’s lead author from the International Livestock Research Institute  Mark van Wijk says, RHoMIS allows us to gain a consistent level of detail over a wide range of topics, allowing us to understand the multiple social and economic interactions that are observable in a wide diversity of locations, projects, cultures or climate zones. For example, we found in East Africa that female control over income goes up when households have more types of crops or livestock, but tends to go down when households sell a larger proportion of their agricultural products on the market. 

In summary, RHoMIS can make development-related actions more efficient, more effective, and quicker to deploy. Our goal is that in five years the RHoMIS-based dataset is the go-to place for information on smallholder farming. By then, it could be the biggest single database for research and development for rural farming households in the world. 



Feed the Future Lab support 

The research paper was made possible, in part, by the Feed the Future Innovations Lab, which is funded by the United States Agency for International Development. Among other initiatives, Feed the Future supports applied research to improve nutrition and agriculture in the countries where my colleagues and I work. We believe this tool will help us better tackle the global challenges of nutrition and rural livelihoods at local scales. 

About the Alliance 

The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) delivers research-based solutions that harness agricultural biodiversity and sustainably transform food systems to improve people's lives. Alliance solutions address the global crises of malnutrition, climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation. The Alliance is part of CGIAR, a global research partnership for a food-secure future. http://www.bioversityinternational.orghttp://www.ciat.cgiar.orghttp://www.cgiar.org 


The Global Food and Agriculture Program aims to inform the development of US policy on global agricultural development and food security by raising awareness and providing resources, information, and policy analysis to the US Administration, Congress, and interested experts and organizations.

The Global Food and Agriculture Program is housed within the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. The Council on Global Affairs convenes leading global voices and conducts independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

Support for the Global Food and Agriculture Program is generously provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


1,000 Days Blog, 1,000 Days

Africa Can End Poverty, World Bank

Agrilinks Blog

Bread Blog, Bread for the World

Can We Feed the World Blog, Agriculture for Impact

Concern Blogs, Concern Worldwide

Institute Insights, Bread for the World Institute

End Poverty in South Asia, World Bank

Global Development Blog, Center for Global Development

The Global Food Banking Network

Harvest 2050, Global Harvest Initiative

The Hunger and Undernutrition Blog, Humanitas Global Development

International Food Policy Research Institute News, IFPRI

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Blog, CIMMYT

ONE Blog, ONE Campaign

One Acre Fund Blog, One Acre Fund

Overseas Development Institute Blog, Overseas Development Institute

Oxfam America Blog, Oxfam America

Preventing Postharvest Loss, ADM Institute

Sense & Sustainability Blog, Sense & Sustainability

WFP USA Blog, World Food Program USA


| By Roger Thurow

Our New Gordian Knot

Fifty years ago Dr. Norman Borlaug recieved the Nobel Peace Prize for cutting the "Goridan knot" of population and food production. Now the planet faces another seemingly intractable problem: how to nourish the planet while preserving the planet.