March 27, 2014

Commentary Series: The Case for Land Rights

By Tim Hanstad

This post is part of a series developed by The Chicago Council on Global Affairs and Landesa to highlight the importance of securing land rights for smallholder farmers. This series is running concurrently with the World Bank’s 2014 Land and Poverty Conference taking place in Washington, DC. Follow the conversation on Twitter with hashtag #landrights.

More than one billion of the world’s poorest people share three traits: they live in rural areas, rely on the land to survive, and they lack secure legal rights to the land on which they depend.

Most either toil in other people’s fields for pennies a day or struggle on land which they temporarily control, but insecurely — with the constant threat of displacement.

The coins they earn can never stretch far enough to allow them to buy their own plot, and they have little long-term incentive to improve the plot they currently farm. Often, they can’t send their children to school or obtain other government services, like agricultural credit or inputs, because they are not landowners. As a result, they lack opportunity and are vulnerable to displacement, exploitation, and calls to extremism.  Without a fundamental change, their children and grandchildren face a similar future.

Creating a better and safer future for us all depends upon giving these modern-day serfs the opportunity for better life.

Land is at the center of both the problem and the solution.

Where land ownership is limited to the privileged few, poverty and instability are much more likely to exist. But broadly providing secure land rights pays dividends. It allows desperately poor agricultural laborers to grow the food to feed themselves and their families and it facilitates economic growth, improves the status of women, improves environmental conservation, and prevents unrest and conflict.

Consider Shakti’s tiny field of dreams in a small village in the Chitoor district of India’s Andra Pradesh. As a landless farm laborer, Shakti earned less than $1 a day. She and her children lived a life of hunger and vulnerability. Then, with the help of a government subsidy, she was able to buy a tiny plot of land to live on and farm. Now, her plot provides her and her family with fruit, vegetables and a small income that has allowed her to take her children out of the fields and put them into the classroom.

Recognizing the potential, a handful of Indian states have launched micro-plot-with the understanding that plots as small as one-tenth an acre can help families bootstrap themselves out of extreme poverty. The democratic, market-friendly programs that rely on distributing government owned land when it is available and private land bought at market rate when it is not, have helped hundreds of thousands of Indian families escape extreme poverty.

Still, too few countries are tackling the issue of land rights. Yes, it’s difficult to implement land rights programs that provide broader access to the poorest, stronger rights for all, and harnesses the power of markets.

But it can be done.

The fact is, secure land rights enables sustainable structural reform. Education, health, micro-credit, and a variety of other smart aid interventions are all made more effective when families have secure rights to land. Anyone working in international development – from NGOs to governments – should partner with experts who are working to advance secure land rights, especially for women, into their own poverty reduction and growth strategies in order to achieve systemic change, not just short-term relief.

The tools necessary to do this are increasingly available. The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization established an on-line database which offers up to date information on the status of property rights in almost 80 countries. The UN’s Global Land Tool Networkpromotes the issue of land rights and tenure security. USAID’s Land Tenure and Property Rights Portal provides country-specific land tenure and property rights issues. The Millenium Challenge Corporation, and the World Bank continue to expand their land rights work. And WRI and Landesa have partnered to create the online tool Focus on Land in Africa, which helps development practitioners working in Africa recognize and understand the influence of land tenure in their work. Landesa also supports Landwise, a free on-line library of women’s customary and formal land rights around the world. Landesa has also launched fellowships to expose more professionals around the world to the issue of  land rights and women’s land rights in particular.

But more needs to be done. Countries such as Liberia, which is stymied in its recovery by extreme conflicts over land, need to be supported in their efforts to build effective dispute resolution institutions to deal with the millions of cases of conflicting land ownership claims that normally arise following a conflict. Other countries, such as Pakistan, need to be supported in their efforts to diminish the siren call of extremists through broad-based economic development based on pro-poor land rights programs.

At the same time, corporations working in developing countries can speak with government leaders in the countries in which they work about the need for broad-based land ownership to encourage stability, broad educational gains, and the type long-term growth that will benefit everyone’s bottom line.

Tim Hanstad is President and CEO of Landesa.


The Global Food and Agriculture Program aims to inform the development of US policy on global agricultural development and food security by raising awareness and providing resources, information, and policy analysis to the US Administration, Congress, and interested experts and organizations.

The Global Food and Agriculture Program is housed within the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. The Council on Global Affairs convenes leading global voices and conducts independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

Support for the Global Food and Agriculture Program is generously provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


1,000 Days Blog, 1,000 Days

Africa Can End Poverty, World Bank

Agrilinks Blog

Bread Blog, Bread for the World

Can We Feed the World Blog, Agriculture for Impact

Concern Blogs, Concern Worldwide

Institute Insights, Bread for the World Institute

End Poverty in South Asia, World Bank

Global Development Blog, Center for Global Development

The Global Food Banking Network

Harvest 2050, Global Harvest Initiative

The Hunger and Undernutrition Blog, Humanitas Global Development

International Food Policy Research Institute News, IFPRI

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Blog, CIMMYT

ONE Blog, ONE Campaign

One Acre Fund Blog, One Acre Fund

Overseas Development Institute Blog, Overseas Development Institute

Oxfam America Blog, Oxfam America

Preventing Postharvest Loss, ADM Institute

Sense & Sustainability Blog, Sense & Sustainability

WFP USA Blog, World Food Program USA


| By Kat Sisler

You Should Know: Global Fragility Act of 2019

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs is pleased to announce a new blog series, Policies for a Nourished Future, which reviews domestic and international policies meant to address issues of global food security. Over the next two months, we will discuss areas of importance to the future of food such as technology, waste, and resilience, and the policies meant to address them. Without robust and proactive policy frameworks, nourishing our growing world will become increasingly difficult and expensive. The first piece in this series explains the Global Fragility Act and how it relates to food security.

| By Khristopher Nicholas

Next Generation 2019 - We All Gotta Eat

Our first post in the Next Generation blog series is by Khristopher Nicholas, PhD candidate in nutrition science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.