August 22, 2013

Commentary - Food Security, Postharvest Loss, and Henry Kissinger

By Steve Sonka
Director, ADM Institute for the Prevention of Post Harvest Loss

The issue of global food security has recently reemerged as an important societal concern.  Factors such as the prospect of needing to feed an additional two billion people in the next two or three decades, the presence today of nearly 870 million people who are chronically hungry, and the recent social unrest associated with food price increases all have contributed to a reawakening of interest in this issue.

Prevention of postharvest loss is increasingly cited as a means to effectively contribute to available food supplies.  The 2013 Advancing Global Food Security report [1] of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs specifies an action recommendation to “halve postharvest losses by 2023”.  It notes that “without adequate infrastructure to store and transport crops, enormous amounts of food are lost on the way from farms to consumers’ tables”.  Indeed, recent studies provide indications that postharvest losses are substantial, with a commonly cited assessment that 1/3 of the world’s agricultural product is wasted.[2]

However, the notion that reduction of postharvest loss has the potential to materially advance food security isn’t necessarily new.  In September 1975, the U.N. General Assembly held a special session focused on world food challenges.  There, then US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger strongly recommended that “the Food and Agriculture Organization, in conjunction with the U.N. Development Program and the World Bank, set a goal of cutting in half these post harvest losses by 1985.”[3]  Shortly thereafter, the U.N. General Assembly formally resolved to achieve the goals specified by Kissinger.

The Kissinger recommendation and the General Assembly resolution raise an interesting question; Did we achieve those goals? Were postharvest losses cut in half by 1985? By 2013? Of course, world crop production has expanded greatly – in fact, tripled over the last 50 years.[4]  Therefore, it is possible (but not likely), that the cited massive levels of current loss actually represent large proportional reductions from the levels of the 1970s.  But we don’t know.

As a manager, not knowing is a significant problem.  Whether the decision affects national policy or involves a smallholder farmer allocating scarce resources, not knowing seldom fosters effective decision making.  While it is known that reliable data is lacking, we’ve tended not to recognize that measurement itself is an economic activity. A fundamental reason for lack of measured data is that historically, given available technologies and techniques, the perceived cost of measuring postharvest loss exceeded the perceived benefits of doing so.  Therefore, even though there is an increasing realization:

  • that reducing postharvest loss could contribute to advancing society’s food security goals and
  • that lack of reliable data on loss inhibits our ability to effectively prevent loss,

realization by itself isn’t likely to alter the economic relationships which have inhibited past measurement efforts.

Fortunately both technology and economics are not static.  The rapid adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) in developing nations offers the potential for significant alteration in the measurement cost/benefit ratio associated with postharvest loss.  Techniques and perspectives of measurement, however, will need to be developed to fully exploit the potentials associated with ICT innovation.  Speculation regarding the nature of these changes will be the subject of our next blog post on September 4. Theexciting possibility is that in 2023 we’ll be able to answer the question;

Did we halve postharvest loss over the last 10 years?

This commentary is cross-posted with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's ADM Institute for the Prevention of Post Harvest Loss blog

[1] The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. 2013. Advancing Global Food Security: The Power of Science, Trade, and Business, p. 81.

[2] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2011. Global Food Losses and Food Waste. p. v. Retrieved from:, August 19, 2013.

[3] Bourne, Malcolm. C. 1977. Post Harvest Food Losses – The Neglected Dimension in Increasing the World Food Supply.

[4] FAO Statistical Yearbook. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2013, p. 128. Retrieved from:, August 19, 2013.


The Global Food and Agriculture Program aims to inform the development of US policy on global agricultural development and food security by raising awareness and providing resources, information, and policy analysis to the US Administration, Congress, and interested experts and organizations.

The Global Food and Agriculture Program is housed within the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, an independent, nonpartisan organization that provides insight – and influences the public discourse – on critical global issues. The Council on Global Affairs convenes leading global voices and conducts independent research to bring clarity and offer solutions to challenges and opportunities across the globe. The Council is committed to engaging the public and raising global awareness of issues that transcend borders and transform how people, business, and governments engage the world.

Support for the Global Food and Agriculture Program is generously provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


1,000 Days Blog, 1,000 Days

Africa Can End Poverty, World Bank

Agrilinks Blog

Bread Blog, Bread for the World

Can We Feed the World Blog, Agriculture for Impact

Concern Blogs, Concern Worldwide

Institute Insights, Bread for the World Institute

End Poverty in South Asia, World Bank

Global Development Blog, Center for Global Development

The Global Food Banking Network

Harvest 2050, Global Harvest Initiative

The Hunger and Undernutrition Blog, Humanitas Global Development

International Food Policy Research Institute News, IFPRI

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Blog, CIMMYT

ONE Blog, ONE Campaign

One Acre Fund Blog, One Acre Fund

Overseas Development Institute Blog, Overseas Development Institute

Oxfam America Blog, Oxfam America

Preventing Postharvest Loss, ADM Institute

Sense & Sustainability Blog, Sense & Sustainability

WFP USA Blog, World Food Program USA


| By Roger Thurow

Our New Gordian Knot

Fifty years ago Dr. Norman Borlaug recieved the Nobel Peace Prize for cutting the "Goridan knot" of population and food production. Now the planet faces another seemingly intractable problem: how to nourish the planet while preserving the planet. 

| By Janet Fierro

Guest Commentary - Rural Niger Women find Opportunity and Hope through Innovative Business Model

When researchers set out to find natural ways to manage a crop-destroying pest in sub-Saharan Africa cowpea fields they knew the results could have significant positive impact on smallholder farmers. What they may not have expected was the significance of the cottage industry it inspired and the entrepreneurial spirit of the rural women of Niger who led it.